Arlington, Virginia
March 12, 2023
March 12, 2023
March 14, 2023
Diversity and Professional Engineering Education Papers
10
10.18260/1-2--45059
https://peer.asee.org/45059
121
Charles D. “Chuck” Newhouse received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech after working nine years as a consulting structural engineer for MMM Design Group in Norfolk, Virginia. He spent three years teaching at Texas Tech University before joining the faculty at the Virginia Military Institute in 2008 where he is now the Charles S. Luck, Jr. ’20 Institute Professor in Engineering. He is also currently serving as the department head of the Civil and Environmental Engineering department.
Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech and worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on bridge research. He is currently The Jackson-Hope Professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics and structural engineering courses and enjoys working with the students on bridge related research projects and the ASCE student chapter.
Abstract
Last year, the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department investigated the depth and breath of engineering laboratory classes both at VMI and nine peer institutions in the Virginia Region as defined by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). The study concluded that engineering laboratory experiences were still valued by all institutions for several reasons including satisfying ABET and Civil Engineering Book of Knowledge (CEBOK) requirements. Strong support from most institutions could be used to justify the inclusion of laboratory experiments within the curriculum.
Although there was good agreement concerning the value hands-on laboratory experiences in the engineering programs within the Virginia Region, the presentation of the work was challenged by some. Accusations were made that institutions that provided hands-on laboratory experiments were not being equitable because students at smaller programs could not afford hands-on laboratory equipment. Some contested that virtual labs were better than hands-on labs and more equitable because no physical equipment was needed. Others argued that virtual labs required more sophisticated computer skills. A third group stated that any lab experience gives a graduate an advantage over a graduate from a program that offers no labs. This study will reevaluate the benefits of laboratory experiences considering the question of equity.
Newhouse, C. D., & Swenty, M. K. (2023, March), Which is more Equitable: Hands-on Labs, Virtual Labs, or No Lab at All? Paper presented at ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Arlington, Virginia. 10.18260/1-2--45059
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015