Montreal, Quebec, Canada
June 22, 2025
June 22, 2025
August 15, 2025
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 6: LEES Works in Progress
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
12
10.18260/1-2--57351
https://peer.asee.org/57351
3
Brian Kirkmeyer is the Karen Buchwald Wright Senior Assistant Dean for Student Success and Instructor in the College of Engineering and Computing at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. His background includes BS, MS and PhD degrees in Materials Science and Engineering, and has focused his teaching on global inquiry and engineering design within heavy metal music and culture. He is active in broadening access in engineering and computing, and in particular for women and the LGBTQ+ community.
Feedback from employers of the author’s home institution indicate that graduates need to begin their careers familiarized with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools so that they can apply them to their work. To do that, educators must raise the floor on how they use GenAI in their pedagogy, in both the major courses as well as general education. It is a difficult demand of instructors because of the very fast developmental pace of GenAI and large-learning models (LLMs), and the race by these developers to win the market with their specific tool. This author thus felt it imperative to introduce GenAI as soon as possible into their primary course offering, and potentially accelerate their learning curve as steeply as GenAI is developing. This study focuses on the qualitative student experiences with and responses to implementing a GenAI requirement in an engineering-focused liberal education course with a large enrollment of over 300 students. Two of the five essay assignments in the course were altered to introduce a basic approach to utilizing GenAI specifically as a learning tool, as well as to introduce students to critical analysis of another writer’s work. The altered essay assignments address a specific prompt designed to connect directly to the course’s Learning Outcomes, so the expectation is that it contributes to students meeting those Outcomes. The requirement for students is to (1) write their own essay response to the assignment’s prompt, (2) develop their own prompt to ask one or more GenAI chatbots to write an essay about, (3) examine the GenAI-written essay in comparison to their essay, and (4) critique the GenAI essay to discuss quality and accuracy of information. This paper will present anonymized student critiques in a qualitative way, and draw conclusions as to the effectiveness of this basic approach to introducing GenAI into student assessments.
Kirkmeyer, B. P. (2025, June), WIP - An Exploratory Approach to Introducing Generative AI into a Large-scale Engineering-focused General Education Course Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . 10.18260/1-2--57351
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015