WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case Study

Avis Carrero

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Publication Date: February 9, 2025
Start Date: February 9, 2025
End Date: February 11, 2025
Conference Session: Track 6: Technical Session 6: WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case Study
Tagged Topics: Diversity and 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions
Page Count: 13
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/54128
Download Count: 4

Paper Authors

biography

Avis Carrero Tufts University orcid.org/0000-0001-5356-3147

visit author page

Avis Carrero is a civil and environmental engineering PhD candidate at Tufts University. He previously earned an M.S. in Civil Engineering from Tufts, focusing on geosystems engineering. Avis' research focuses on advancing racial and educational equity in engineering education through exploring the experiences of students and faculty. His dissertation research examines factors that shape faculty pedagogical and curricular decision-making related to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in engineering education. Additionally, his research on Black engineering students in teamwork pedagogies explores how race and gender shape their experiences and learning opportunities. In 2023, Avis was awarded the Presidential Award for Civic Life from the Tufts College of Civic Life for his DEIJ-related service and leadership. Avis is a student member of the Tufts School of Engineering DEI committee and serves as an alumni committee member of the Anti-racism and Equity Action Team (ACT) at the University of Connecticut.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Keywords: Faculty, Engineering

This is a work-in-progress (WIP) paper. With the increasing focus on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in engineering education and the critical role of faculty in shaping students' experiences, outcomes, and educational environments, it is essential to examine the various factors influencing faculty pedagogical decisions regarding DEIJ content in curricula. Although integrating DEIJ is positioned as vital for transformative organizational, institutional, and cultural change across engineering, the inclusion of DEIJ-focused content into curricula poses a pedagogical challenge for faculty due to various contextual factors that influence their decision-making process. These factors can emerge from state-level policies (e.g., Texas restriction of DEI initiatives), institutional and departmental culture, disciplinary norms, student resistance, job responsibilities, and personal beliefs regarding DEIJ. Moreover, educational norms and traditions can perpetuate white interests and white supremacy, particularly when crucial sociohistorical contexts (e.g., slavery, civil rights, immigration) go overlooked in faculty pedagogical practices. Understanding how these influences translate into classroom practices is crucial for advancing DEIJ in engineering education.

This WIP research employs a Comparative Case Study (CCS) to examine the institutional, disciplinary, and personal influences shaping faculty pedagogical decisions regarding DEIJ in engineering. The study aims to identify the mechanisms by which these influences manifest in curricular and pedagogical decisions. To achieve this, qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews with engineering faculty and analysis of instructor- and institutional-level documents (e.g., teaching statements, university reports) are used. The faculty participants were recruited through purposeful, convenience, and snowball sampling methods, resulting in a final sample of 33 faculty from 14 states representing public and private institutions, including land grants and Hispanic-serving institutions. These faculty members span various disciplines, ranks, and tracks (e.g., teaching, tenure track). The semi-structured interviews explored their conceptions of DEIJ, opportunities for integrating DEIJ in teaching, pedagogical approaches, institutional and disciplinary influences, and the impact of recent sociohistorical events (e.g., COVID-19, Black Lives Matter).

This study draws on the Academic Plan Model (APM) and the White Racial Consciousness/Faculty Behavior Model (WRC/FB) to: (a) examine how academic strategies affect instructional choices, considering factors like content knowledge, social contexts, teaching experience, and institutional culture, and (b) explores how faculty's racial consciousness influences their equity-oriented pedagogical practices. These frameworks allow the CCS to consider structural elements influencing pedagogical choices and assess how sociocultural contexts shape individual perspectives. While data analysis for this CCS is ongoing, preliminary review, reflection, and immersion of the data indicate an array of social, cultural, political, and academic contexts and influences, including: (a) DEIJ conceptions and perspectives; (b) professional and personal experiences (e.g., DEIJ research, training and teaching); (c) emerging cases and groups (i.e., department heads/admin, instructional resources, faculty opportunity structures); (d) pedagogical beliefs and practices (e.g., Universal design learning); and (e) institutional factors (e.g., institutional diversity, mission, and existing DEI initiatives) and processes (e.g., faculty governance structures, accreditation). We will discuss implications for research on engineering faculty pedagogies and experiences, DEIJ curricular initiatives, and policies in engineering education.

Citation
Format

Carrero, A. (2025, February), WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case Study Paper presented at 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD), San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/54128

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Keywords: Faculty, Engineering

This is a work-in-progress (WIP) paper. With the increasing focus on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in engineering education and the critical role of faculty in shaping students&#39; experiences, outcomes, and educational environments, it is essential to examine the various factors influencing faculty pedagogical decisions regarding DEIJ content in curricula. Although integrating DEIJ is positioned as vital for transformative organizational, institutional, and cultural change across engineering, the inclusion of DEIJ-focused content into curricula poses a pedagogical challenge for faculty due to various contextual factors that influence their decision-making process. These factors can emerge from state-level policies (e.g., Texas restriction of DEI initiatives), institutional and departmental culture, disciplinary norms, student resistance, job responsibilities, and personal beliefs regarding DEIJ. Moreover, educational norms and traditions can perpetuate white interests and white supremacy, particularly when crucial sociohistorical contexts (e.g., slavery, civil rights, immigration) go overlooked in faculty pedagogical practices. Understanding how these influences translate into classroom practices is crucial for advancing DEIJ in engineering education. 

This WIP research employs a Comparative Case Study (CCS) to examine the institutional, disciplinary, and personal influences shaping faculty pedagogical decisions regarding DEIJ in engineering. The study aims to identify the mechanisms by which these influences manifest in curricular and pedagogical decisions. To achieve this, qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews with engineering faculty and analysis of instructor- and institutional-level documents (e.g., teaching statements, university reports) are used. The faculty participants were recruited through purposeful, convenience, and snowball sampling methods, resulting in a final sample of 33 faculty from 14 states representing public and private institutions, including land grants and Hispanic-serving institutions. These faculty members span various disciplines, ranks, and tracks (e.g., teaching, tenure track). The semi-structured interviews explored their conceptions of DEIJ, opportunities for integrating DEIJ in teaching, pedagogical approaches, institutional and disciplinary influences, and the impact of recent  sociohistorical events (e.g., COVID-19, Black Lives Matter).

This study draws on the Academic Plan Model (APM) and the White Racial Consciousness/Faculty Behavior Model (WRC/FB) to: (a) examine how academic strategies affect instructional choices, considering factors like content knowledge, social contexts, teaching experience, and institutional culture, and (b) explores how faculty&#39;s racial consciousness influences their equity-oriented pedagogical practices. These frameworks allow the CCS to consider structural elements influencing pedagogical choices and assess how sociocultural contexts shape individual perspectives. While data analysis for this CCS is ongoing, preliminary review, reflection, and immersion of the data indicate an array of social, cultural, political, and academic contexts and influences, including: (a) DEIJ conceptions and perspectives; (b) professional and personal experiences (e.g., DEIJ research, training and teaching); (c) emerging cases and groups (i.e., department heads/admin, instructional resources, faculty opportunity structures); (d) pedagogical beliefs and practices (e.g., Universal design learning); and (e) institutional factors (e.g., institutional diversity, mission, and existing DEI initiatives) and processes (e.g., faculty governance structures, accreditation). We will discuss implications for research on engineering faculty pedagogies and experiences, DEIJ curricular initiatives, and policies in engineering education.
AU  - Avis Carrero
CY  - San Antonio, Texas
DA  - 2025/02/09
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case Study
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/54128
ER  -