July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has created a far more challenging educational environment but has also created an opportunity for scrutiny of virtual instruction practices. Previously, we have presented on the implementation of a sequence of MATLAB-based programming activities for undergraduates in biomedical engineering to synthesize and integrate knowledge from previous coursework. Previously offered in a face-to-face modality, the most recent term presented these activities to students in either virtual synchronous and face-to-face environments. A few students additionally undertook the activities in a virtual asynchronous mode. We hypothesize that the face-to-face environment significantly improves student achievement on measured outcomes. The majority of courses at our institution were offered in virtual modes (87%), while 13% of courses identified as essential were implemented in-person with an approved safety plan. Students were not compelled to attend face-to-face courses and were given the option to pursue virtual alternatives. In this case, we were able to offer identical material and synchronous instruction during the laboratory activity to virtual students. This combination of factors presented us with a unique opportunity to simultaneously study the impact of face-to-face and virtual synchronous instruction modes. Programming, as a practice, lends itself quite well to adaptation to a virtual environment. By its very nature, it appears be a prime candidate for virtual implementation. It requires no unique infrastructure, no difficult to maintain or handle materials, and no required “hands-on” components. However, students in the early stages of learning programming struggle to separate technical issues from programming issues, unique interface elements or requirements, and other highly individualized, situational factors that contribute to success or failure in implementing a particular piece of code. For this reason, we prioritized face-to-face instruction where students could receive individualized assistance, thus avoiding some of the downsides of virtual instruction which include, but are not limited to, an increased time commitment required to engage with an instructor virtually or learning in an environment where synchronous communication may be difficult. An additional factor to be considered is the availability of computational and communication resources available to a diverse student cohort. Data collected to date support our hypothesis that student achievement is improved with face-to-face instruction.
Hawkins, B. (2021, July), WIP: Virtual Vs. Face-to-Face Synchronous Laboratory Instruction for Programming MATLAB for Biomedical Engineers Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--38103
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015