Asee peer logo

Work in Progress: A Multi-Modal Method for Assessing Student Emotions During Programming Tasks

Download Paper |

Conference

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Salt Lake City, Utah

Publication Date

June 23, 2018

Start Date

June 23, 2018

End Date

July 27, 2018

Conference Session

System 1 in Engineering Education and Research

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count

5

DOI

10.18260/1-2--31264

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/31264

Download Count

158

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

S. Zahra Atiq Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

visit author page

Zahra Atiq is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is interested in learning about the non-cognitive/affective and individual/demographic factors that impact students in STEM courses. Specifically, she is interested in understanding the emotions students’ experience while learning computer programming. She is also interested in understanding women's participation in computer science and engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Computer programming is considered a necessary skill for engineering students. As a consequence, programming courses are introduced to undergraduates early in their engineering education. However, learning programming is a difficult undertaking [1]. It is challenging because novice students may not have accurate mental models required to learn programming [1]. Hence, students in a programming course may experience a wide array of emotions that may positively or negatively impact their performance and learning [2]. Literature also suggests that students may be academically proficient, but may still encounter difficulties in a programming course [3]. These challenges associated with learning programming may lead students to drop out of engineering or switch to another engineering major [4]. The aim of this study is to investigate the emotions that first-year engineering students experience during programming tasks. In the spring of 2018, I plan on recruiting 15 to 20 research participants from engineering students who will be taking an introductory programming class. I will collect multi-modal data in a laboratory setting in two stages: 1) a programming task and 2) a retrospective think-aloud interview. In the programming task, student participants will attempt to solve four programming problems in 30 minutes. During this task, I will collect observational data (facial expressions), physiological data (Electrodermal Activity), self-report data (Achievement Emotions Questionnaire – AEQ), and a post-task interview. Three to five days after the programming task, I will conduct a retrospective think-aloud interview. In this interview, the participants will verbalize the thought processes they used and the emotions they experienced while working on the programming problems, the reasons for those emotions, and the self-regulation strategies they used. The retrospective interview will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a theoretical thematic analysis technique. This combination of methods is relatively new in engineering education research. A better understanding of student emotions may help educators design curriculum and pedagogy to mitigate the effects of negative emotions, and to promote positive emotions. This improved curriculum and pedagogy may eventually help students maximize their learning and performance in programming courses. Subsequently, student motivation and interest in programming may also be increased by using this improved and enhanced curriculum and pedagogy.

References

[1] A. Robins, J. Rountree, and N. Rountree, “Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 13, pp. 137–172, 2003. [2] M. Zeidner, “Anxiety in education,” in International handbook of emotions in education, Routledge, 2014, pp. 265 – 288. [3] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525–548, Oct. 2014. [4] S. Secules, A. Elby, and A. Gupta, “‘Turning away’ from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of the Cultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Programming Class,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.

Atiq, S. Z. (2018, June), Work in Progress: A Multi-Modal Method for Assessing Student Emotions During Programming Tasks Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--31264

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015