New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
June 29, 2016
978-0-692-68565-5
2153-5965
Educational Research and Methods
21
10.18260/p.27209
https://peer.asee.org/27209
547
Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, and engineering design.
Ṣenay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. Her research examines how engineering students approach innovation. She also studies informed design practices among college and pre-college students . She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education (JPEER).
Engineering educators strive to improve students’ abilities to contribute to innovative products, processes, and systems. However, innovation is a complex phenomenon that spans a variety of disciplines and can be affected by a variety context-dependent variables. This work in progress presents an ongoing study that employs a phenomenographic approach to explore variation in how engineering students experience innovation. Semi-structured phenomenographic interviews were conducted with 33 undergraduate engineering students from a research university in the midwestern United States. These participants were selected to maximize variation in engineering project experience, academic discipline, year in school, gender, and nationality. Iterative, empathetic, and inductive data analysis is currently informing the development of categories that describe unique ways individual students had of experiencing innovation as well as the structural relationships between these categories. This paper presents an intermediate version of the results as a critical step in the analysis process. Presenting these results to a diverse group of educators and researchers, especially those outside the educational context in which the study took place, can elicit critical feedback that may inform new ways of interpreting the data and results. Eventually, the results of this study may suggest pedagogical activities that are beneficial in learning innovation, describe learning progressions, and provide a knowledgebase to aid the development improved assessments on the topic of innovation in engineering.
Fila, N. D., & Purzer, S. (2016, June), Work in Progress: A Preliminary Investigation of the Ways Engineering Students Experience Innovation Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27209
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015