Montreal, Quebec, Canada
June 22, 2025
June 22, 2025
August 15, 2025
ELOS Technical Session 3: Advancing Engineering Competencies: From Labs to Writing
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)
11
https://peer.asee.org/57475
2
Hannah Kimmel is a recently graduated PhD candidate at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is actively seeking a teaching faculty position and is interested in student engagement, developing a sense of belonging in science for students, and bioengineering curriculum creation.
Joseph Tibbs is a Bioengineering PhD candidate at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He is interested in pursuing a passion for education by becoming a teaching faculty and exploring topics of ethics education, engineer identity formation, and bioengineering curriculum development.
Kaitlyn Tuvillea is a Bioengineering Undergraduate with a Statistics Minor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her interests in the therapeutics, cell and tissue engineering, and bioengineering curriculum development are complemented by her involvement in Society of Women Engineers (SWE), Women in Engineering (WIE), Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES), and Brain Matters.
Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Providing meaningful feedback to each student in large courses can be time-consuming. In large laboratory courses, feedback can take even longer due to the nature of the assignments. Some features integrated into learning management systems (LMS) or tools like GradeScope, can improve efficiency and reduce grading time. However, there is still room for improvement. During the fall 2024 semester, this team explored additional ways to speed up the time it takes for students to identify mistakes made during a biomedical instrumentation laboratory course. The new feedback mechanisms included autograded pre-lab questions, additional checkpoints during lab experiments, in-class self-evaluation of circuit designs, and improved post-lab reflection prompts. The goal of these improvements was to decrease the amount of time between when the mistake was made and when the students were made aware of the mistake. Our hope is that students will learn more from their mistakes and will be less likely to repeat them if their mistakes are identified sooner.
We used participatory action research to identify improvements and analyze outcomes. The research team included the professor, a former teaching assistant, former students, a current teaching assistant, and a current undergraduate laboratory student. Additional feedback was also solicited from students enrolled in the course. So far, the new additions have improved the speed of feedback given to the students. Additional data will be collected and analyzed throughout the rest of the fall 2024 semester.
This biomedical instrumentation laboratory course is required for third-year bioengineering students at a large public university in the Midwestern United States. Students in other engineering majors also enroll in the course as a technical elective. In addition to the laboratory course, the students are also enrolled in a complementary lecture course that covers the theoretical background of biomedical instrumentation.
Kimmel, H. R. C., & Agrawal, M., & Tibbs, J., & Tuvilleja, K., & Reck, R. M. (2025, June), Work In Progress: Adding Additional Methods to Identify Mistakes in an Undergraduate Biomedical Instrumentation Laboratory Course Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/57475
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015