Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
Diversity
7
10.18260/1-2--44245
https://peer.asee.org/44245
157
Dr. Lilley's research interests in engineering education focus on professional development of engineering students at the undergraduate and graduate level. In particular, she is interested in studying the effects of the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity on the professional formation of engineers.
This work in progress paper outlines the evaluation of a self-advocacy program for historically marginalized graduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) at a minority serving institution. Self-advocacy originates from the American Counseling Association (ACA) and the Learning Disabilities (LD) communities for effective counseling that promotes academic success and is based on a social justice framework. The underlying principle of self-advocacy is that supporting the agency and knowledge development of students supports moving beyond retention of students through critical transitions to their long term participation in their educational learning, such as post-secondary education in STEM. The pillars of the self-advocacy program are centered on (i) Empowerment, (ii) Promoting self-awareness and (iii) Social Justice and programming in [Name] is aligned and repeated along these three pillars. The current professional development program is in its third year of implementation and to date twenty-seven students have participated in the program. The research aim of this project is to study whether developing skills in self-advocacy of historically minoritized graduate students will support their academic success. Herein, we present the results of the evaluation of the program through a student survey and focus group. The student survey and focus group questions were designed to measure student knowledge, skills and attributes that are expected to be impacted through self-advocacy learning. For example, these may include developing a sense of belonging in their professional community, instilling a sense of agency in their decisions, and also learning about policies to advocate for themselves. The evaluation will serve to identify which programmatic elements the students find most beneficial, which can potentially be institutionalized and expanded more broadly to other institutions or groups that support graduate students in STEM.
Lilley, C. M. (2023, June), Work in Progress: Evaluating Teaching Self-Advocacy to Historically Minoritized Graduate Students in STEM Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44245
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015