Asee peer logo

Writing Critical Reviews In Technical Courses In A Bseet Program: Student Perceptions

Download Paper |


2008 Annual Conference & Exposition


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008



Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Technology Programs

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology

Page Count


Page Numbers

13.1413.1 - 13.1413.9



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Albert Lozano Pennsylvania State University - Wilkes-Barre

visit author page

Albert Lozano is Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State Wilkes-Barre. His research interests are centered in the study of errors in bioelectrical impedance measurements, the incorporation of RFID in education and the development of techniques to enhance student learning. He can be reached at

visit author page

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract


Albert Lozano-Nieto, PhD The Pennsylvania State University Commonwealth College Wilkes-Barre Campus P.O. Box PSU Lehman, PA 18627 Phone: (570) 675-9245 email:

To support TAC of ABET Criterion 2 points (g) and (h), we have incorporated the writing of critical reviews in an Electronics Design course –junior level- in the Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering Technology program offered at the campus. The students are asked to read and submit a critical review for each one of 5 articles previously selected by the instructor. These articles are all technical in nature extracted from professional and trade publications, written by engineers for engineers. At the beginning of the semester the instructor explains to the students the reason for this classroom activity as well as its weight on the final grade. The instructor also emphasizes that it is very unlikely that the students will be able to fully understand all the topics presented in each article and this has been chosen on purpose as these articles now become a tool for the students to learn in more detail the topics presented in each article. It also serves to emphasize to the students that learning does not stop on graduation as professional and practitioners use these publications to continue learning and refreshing their knowledge. The instructor provides feedback for each to each student on the technical contents of their review as well as grammar, spelling and clear transmission of ideas.

At the end of the course the students were asked to respond to an anonymous survey about this activity. The survey focused on questioning the students on the technical concepts that they learned from the article reviews as well as how they felt about writing the reviews. The main findings can be summarized as follows:

a) Students didn’t like having to write the critical reviews. b) Students acknowledged the value of the critical reviews as a tool that gave them a broader insight into the topic of the course, analog electronic design.

This paper describes in detail the results from this activity as well as provides information and insight for colleagues in any engineering or engineering technology program who want to incorporate similar activities into their courses.

Lozano, A. (2008, June), Writing Critical Reviews In Technical Courses In A Bseet Program: Student Perceptions Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3256

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015