Salt Lake City, Utah
June 20, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 23, 2004
9.1431.1 - 9.1431.16
Writing Self-Assessment for First-Year Engineering Students: Initial Findings
Chris Leslie, Elisa Linsky, Gunter Georgi
Seeking to understand what and how students are learning about writing in its first-year engineering course, we have implemented an assessment project for Polytechnic University’s core engineering course. Building on an innovative Writing Consultant program that already was implemented for EG 1004, Introduction to Engineering and Design, the assessment project draws several projects from English composition instruction to improve the communications skills of engineering students. Through the generous support of the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), we were able to develop the program and implement it in three sections in the Fall 2003 semester, providing valuable insights into the assessment process and this project in particular. The project has continued in Spring 2004, expanding its scope and building on the lessons learned from the fall. This interim report describes the original conception of the program, the results obtained in the fall semester, and presents the improvements made to the project based on those results. The project was successful in creating a dialogue between students and instructors, and among instructors, about the assessment of writing. This dialogue allowed instructors to quickly correct student misconceptions, gave students a critical standpoint for evaluating their own writing, and offered them a forum to discuss their writing issues in a nonthreatening setting before getting a formal grade on a report.
Starting with the assumption that students need to know more about writing than what information belongs in what section of a lab report, this program asks students to become involved in assessing their own work. We chose this approach because it leads students to approach writing as an apprenticeship in a larger community of scientific writers, instead of writing reports as a classroom exercise. The traditional grading of lab reports tends to focus on mechanical aspects of writing, such as grammar and format, leaving equally important issues such as logic and reliability to be neglected. This approach results in empty reports, where student simply follow a formulaic pattern to fill up the pages of the report without considering how the parts fit together. For students who are learning English as a second language, traditional instruction leads them to believe that matching nouns and verbs is more important than proving a scientific argument. The approach we describe in this paper encourages students to examine the process of technical communication, express the design principles behind their work, and consider how to communicate effectively.
Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering
Linsky, E., & Georgi, G. (2004, June), Writing Self Assessment For First Year Engineering Students: Initial Findings, Chris Leslie, Elisa Linsky Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13208
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015