June 23, 2013
June 23, 2013
June 26, 2013
Educational Research and Methods
23.18.1 - 23.18.22
"You choose between Team A, good grades, and a girlfriend - you get to choose two!" -Monastic commitment contributes to a culture of exclusion for an engineering studentcompetition teamBackground and motivation:A key component of undergraduate engineering education is the opportunity for hands-onexperiential learning. Student, experiential learning, engineering competition teams (SELECT)provide an opportunity for engineering students to practice engineering technical andprofessional skills while engaged in competitive experiential learning design/build projects. Thenumber of students competing in SELECT has increased over the last 30 years from dozens tomany thousands and these teams often garner significant resources from the colleges ofengineering and external sponsors. In spite of efforts to increase participation of under-represented populations (URP) in engineering programs, participation rates of URP students inmany competition teams are exceptionally low, even when normalized for engineeringenrollment.Methods:We seek to identify and explain what factors contribute to cultures of inclusion or exclusionwithin SELECT. This paper will examine one engineering competition team’s culture. Aconstructionist approach to data collection and analysis views power and inequality asinterwoven into all aspects of social life. A cultural construction lens brings into focus the waysthat inclusion is granted or exclusion is maintained to perpetuate privilege and inequality. Usinga qualitative-mixed methods design and a cultural constructionist lens, we conducted andanalyzed interviews with Team A members and the Team A faculty advisor. Additionally, dataconsisting of competition rules, as well as institutional and team artifacts were collected toinform our understanding of the structural conditions of SELECT.Results:Team A consists of 12-15 “core-committed” members, as well as 8-10 “new guys”. All but twocore members are male. The 2011-2012 manifestation was the first for Team A to have twofemales in design-leadership positions. There were no African-American, Native-American orHispanic core members. Only core-committed members accrue the status and highest benefitsavailable to SELECT members, such as meeting potential employers at major competitions. Dataanalysis suggests that the demands of being core-committed limit access to participation, andparticularly core status. Core-commitment involves 30-60 hours per week during the academicyear on team-related activities, team work during school holidays, and summer travel. Corestatus also requires numerous sacrifices including relationships outside the team, paidemployment, academic achievement, and participation in other collegiate activities. Studentswho are unable to make these exceptional sacrifices do not accrue the advantages of SELECTmembership.Conclusions and Significance:The high visibility and lack of diversity of SELECT very loudly counters messages of inclusionand opportunity prominent in national conversations regarding engineering. Membership onSELECT is perceived to provide entrée into high prestige jobs. However, Team A's code ofmonastic commitment drives a culture of exclusion and limits broad participation on the team.Unfortunately, no structural conditions have been identified that mitigate this culture ofexclusion. The lack of opportunity for SELECT participation uncovered in this analysis maycontribute to inequities that extend into students' professional lives after college.
Foor, C. E., & Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A., & Shehab, R. L. (2013, June), "You choose between TEAM A, good grades, and a girlfriend - you get to choose two!" - How a culture of exclusion is constructed and maintained in an engineering design competition team Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19027
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015