Asee peer logo

Using Self Evaluation And Student Generated Portfolios For Assessment Of Student Learning And Course Effectiveness

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Accreditation and Related Issues in ECE

Page Count

7

Page Numbers

7.1273.1 - 7.1273.7

DOI

10.18260/1-2--10483

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/10483

Download Count

465

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Jeff Jalkio

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu

Session 2532

Using Self-Evaluation and Student Generated Portfolios for Assessment of Student Learning and Course Effectiveness

Jeffrey A. Jalkio Department of Engineering University of St. Thomas

Abstract

One advantage of having clearly articulated learning objectives for courses is that students can focus on these objectives to unify course material. Unfortunately, students often ignore the stated course objectives and focus their attention on the specific work required to earn good grades from the instructor. This paper presents a technique for shifting the student focus from the external validation of course grades to a self-evaluation of accomplishment of course learning objectives. Preliminary results from a classroom trial of this technique will be presented.

This approach aims to tie the course grade directly to the student’s self-assessment. At the beginning of the semester, students are given a detailed list of course learning objectives and a grading rubric that relates letter grades to demonstrated levels of accomplishment of these objectives. During the course of the semester assignments are collected and graded to provide formative feedback to the students. At midterm and at the end of the semester, students are required to give the instructor a portfolio of work demonstrating accomplishment of the learning objectives and a summary evaluation specifying the letter grade earned and how the attached portfolio supports their self-assessment. The portfolio primarily includes graded examinations and reports, but can also include other material selected by the student. Summative feedback for the course is based directly on the student self-assessment.

In addition to focusing the students’ attention on course learning objectives, this approach has benefits for program assessment. The portfolio submitted by the student is documentation of successful accomplishment of course objectives and the student self-assessment provides useful information to the instructor on the efficacy of instructional methods and the adequacy of graded work in providing feedback to the student.

Introduction

The grading experiment described in this paper arose in response to the convergence of three separate issues that confront all engineering faculty. First, how do we assign grades that provide accurate feedback to our students on their overall academic progress in achieving course objectives. Second, how do we assess the efficacy of our instruction so that we can improve our

Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Engineering Education

Main Menu

Jalkio, J. (2002, June), Using Self Evaluation And Student Generated Portfolios For Assessment Of Student Learning And Course Effectiveness Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10483

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015