Asee peer logo

Ethical Responsibility Of Engineers For Alumnus Whistleblowing

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Cultivating Professional Responsibility

Page Count

13

Page Numbers

7.527.1 - 7.527.13

DOI

10.18260/1-2--10955

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/10955

Download Count

598

Paper Authors

author page

David Ford

author page

Nancy White

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu

Session Number: 2461

Ethical Responsibility of Engineers for Alumnus Whistleblowing

Nancy J. White, David N. Ford

Central Michigan University / Texas A&M University

Introduction

Since the Watergate cover-up of the mid-1970s the US culture has begun to support the idea of whistleblowing and the belief that persons with knowledge should be encouraged to expose government and private mismanagement, wrongdoing, illegal conduct or conduct dangerous to the health and safety of others. Congress established the Office of Inspector General1 (OIG) in 1978. The OIG maintains a 24-hour hotline 2 for people to report government mismanagement, wrongdoing, illegal conduct, or conduct dangerous to the health and safety of others. The General Accounting Office (GAO) 3 was established by Congress to improve the efficiency of the U.S. government financial audits and reviews. Another example, which shows the support for whistleblowing, is the appearance in employment law of the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Historically the employment-at-will doctrine held that an employer may terminate an employee for any reason or no reason. Over time the law has restricted this right of employers and some employers may not terminate persons based on race, creed, sex, national origin and to some extent disability. 4

Whistleblowing does need to strike a balance with competing values. The Government Accounting Office describes the need to strike a “balance between the objective of encouraging legitimate disclosure of waste, mismanagement and abuse of authority and that of retaining management authority and accountability.”

Parker5 defines whistleblowing as “the release of organizational information to the public which superiors or colleagues would prefer to be kept secret.” Two types of whistleblowers exist:

· Alumnus whistleblowers: who are persons who reveal information about his/her previous organization either on or after departing from it.

· Pure whistleblowers: which are persons who reveal information about their organization while remaining there.

A strong commitment to highly ethical behavior is important to filling engineering's role in society. Does this extend to whistleblowing? Engineering is a profession with specialized

“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”

Main Menu

Ford, D., & White, N. (2002, June), Ethical Responsibility Of Engineers For Alumnus Whistleblowing Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10955

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015