Montreal, Canada
June 16, 2002
June 16, 2002
June 19, 2002
2153-5965
5
7.267.1 - 7.267.5
10.18260/1-2--11124
https://peer.asee.org/11124
437
Main Menu
Session 3215
Bringing Constructibility Issues to Design Courses
Douglas B. Cleary Civil and Environmental Engineering Rowan University 201 Mullica Hill Road Glassboro, NJ 08028
Abstract
This paper describes a teaching tool being developed to fill gaps in the typical student’s knowledge of the construction process. A CD-ROM and/or web site is being created to document construction practices in transportation, bridge, utility and building projects. It will also provide case studies of ways designs can be modified leading to more efficient construction. The information obtained from construction site visits, surveys, and interviews with construction site personnel is being organized in a way that makes the product interactive. Users will be able to focus on areas of construction of most interest. The tool provides a forum for contractors to detail the points they wished engineers knew about construction. The product will also contain miscellaneous information such as a glossary of construction terms and an overview of careers for engineers in construction.
Background and Purpose of the Work
The design content in Civil Engineering curricula across the country is being increased to address accreditation concerns through the introduction of capstone courses and design projects within other courses. Most students are now graduating with some relevant instruction and experience in design1, 2. However contractors note that the designs they are asked to build include features that are difficult or even non-buildable. Often significant field revision occurs to correct oversights, inconsistencies, or omissions in the plans at significant cost to the owner or contractor. Sometimes field revision is required to improve the economy of the work. Lack of experience or knowledge of construction practices on the part of the designer is often cited for these problems. One survey notes that employers are least satisfied with the proficiency of entry-level civil engineers and building science graduates in the areas of management, communications, surveying, and construction 3.
There is limited room in the undergraduate curriculum to include construction practices along with the required engineering science and design. Construction practices can be acknowledged in a limited frame during design courses and further covered through student club field trips and guest speakers. Information related to construction can be found in trade publications and journals devoted to the industry however students probably do not have direct access or the motivation to find these publications unless they are studying construction engineering. A structural engineering student is less likely to see these publications.
“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”
Main Menu
Cleary, D. (2002, June), Bringing Constructibility Issues To Design Course What Contractors Want You To Know Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--11124
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015