Asee peer logo

Engineering Education A Conceptual Framework For Supporting Faculty In Adopting Collaborative Learning

Download Paper |

Conference

2003 Annual Conference

Location

Nashville, Tennessee

Publication Date

June 22, 2003

Start Date

June 22, 2003

End Date

June 25, 2003

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Engineering / Education Collaborations

Page Count

8

Page Numbers

8.497.1 - 8.497.8

DOI

10.18260/1-2--12014

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/12014

Download Count

354

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Steve Shooter

author page

Micheal Hanyak

author page

Matt Higgins

author page

Marie Wagner

author page

Ed Mastascusa

author page

Dan Hyde

author page

Brian Hoyt

author page

Bill Snyder

author page

Michael Prince

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 3531 Engineering Engineering Education A Conceptual Framework for Supporting Faculty in Adopting Collaborative Learning

Brian Hoyt, Michael Prince, Steve Shooter, Michael Hanyak, , E.J. Mastascusa, William Snyder, T. Michael Toole, Mathew Higgins, Daniel C. Hyde, Marie Wagner, Margot Vigeant

Bucknell University

Abstract

Over the last three years, nearly a quarter of Bucknell’s engineering faculty have participated in Project Catalyst, a NSF funded project to promote systemic change in engineering education by integrating instructional design techniques, transforming the classroom into a cooperative learning environment, and incorporating the use of information technology in the teaching/learning process. One of the major outcomes of that work is a conceptual framework for assisting faculty in transitioning from more traditional instructional modes to more collaborative modes of instruction. Drawing heavily on a typical engineering process, this framework maps concepts readily understood in the engineering design world to the development of instructional experiences. This paper outlines that framework and discusses our efforts to export this framework to faculty beyond Bucknell through a pair of national workshops conducted last summer. Included is our assessment of the effectiveness of this effort, both in terms of impact on Bucknell faculty and on the workshop participants.

Introduction

Bucknell's College of Engineering is implementing Project Catalyst, a three-year effort to develop a general-purpose model for the nationally recognized need of systemic engineering education reform. This NSF-sponsored project focuses on the four-year undergraduate curricula in all five engineering disciplines (chemical, civil and environmental, electrical, and mechanical and computer science) at Bucknell University. Specifically, Project Catalyst provides an environment in which to promote change and encourage faculty members, students, and administrators to re-envision their roles in the engineering learning process.

To understand the motivation for this project, recall your undergraduate classroom experience. If you're a typical engineer, you probably had one or more of the following experiences:

• The professor lectured for 50 minutes, and you copied into your notebook what was written on the board.

“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”

Shooter, S., & Hanyak, M., & Higgins, M., & Wagner, M., & Mastascusa, E., & Hyde, D., & Hoyt, B., & Snyder, B., & Prince, M. (2003, June), Engineering Education A Conceptual Framework For Supporting Faculty In Adopting Collaborative Learning Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--12014

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015