Asee peer logo

Student Understanding Of Program Outcomes Through Formative And Summative Course Level Assessment

Download Paper |

Conference

2004 Annual Conference

Location

Salt Lake City, Utah

Publication Date

June 20, 2004

Start Date

June 20, 2004

End Date

June 23, 2004

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

TIME 7: ABET Issues and Capstone Courses

Page Count

16

Page Numbers

9.1131.1 - 9.1131.16

DOI

10.18260/1-2--12786

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/12786

Download Count

375

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Karim Nasr

author page

Raghu Echempati

author page

Arnaldo Mazzei

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 3266

Student Understanding of Program Outcomes through Formative and Summative Course-Level Assessment

Raghu Echempati, Arnaldo Mazzei and Karim Nasr Mechanical Engineering Department Kettering University Flint, MI 48504

Abstract

In this paper, an approach is suggested to begin a process in which each student, while solving a homework problem, or a test or a project is asked to provide additional information concerning what concept(s) is (are) targeted in each homework problem and to what extent, if any, the Program Outcomes (PO’s) were encountered. The courses used here as examples for this approach are: Mechanics III (particle and rigid body kinematics and dynamics) and Design of Mechanical Components I. Students seem in tune with the targeted concepts via course experiences but rather non-consistent with regards to the interpretation of Program Outcomes. For many students, this is the first time that they are asked to examine the outcomes critically, but they all seem to understand and realize the merit of the process (particularly due to the quick feedback of the results that they receive). Some students were further challenged to “redesign” some of the homework problems in such a way that the previously addressed “weaker” Program Outcomes could be better addressed in those redesigned problems. The results of the “redesign” exercise are interesting in that students found it both difficult and challenging to create a new set of homework problems. This leads to the need for the instructor to provide effective ways of posing homework problems, which may be different from conventional exercise problems presented in the currently available textbooks. Presented here is a course-level formative and summative assessment of students’ understanding of the Program Outcomes, including comparison with the instructor’s target expectation for the achievement of such outcomes. The paper concludes with ways to gather better data illustrating students’ interpretation of Program Outcomes and perhaps redesign course content and instructional method to better meet desired outcomes.

Introduction

Recently, the accreditation process of engineering programs has taken a new form, becoming an outcome-based process wherein individual courses and experiences must contribute to the big picture of engineering education and students’ achievement of specific abilities and skills. This Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education

Nasr, K., & Echempati, R., & Mazzei, A. (2004, June), Student Understanding Of Program Outcomes Through Formative And Summative Course Level Assessment Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--12786

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015