Introducing The Engineering Technology Programs To All Incoming Freshmen Engineering And Technology Students – The Result Is Better For All
- Conference
- Location
-
Chicago, Illinois
- Publication Date
-
June 18, 2006
- Start Date
-
June 18, 2006
- End Date
-
June 21, 2006
- ISSN
-
2153-5965
- Conference Session
- Tagged Division
-
Engineering Technology
- Page Count
-
6
- Page Numbers
-
11.835.1 - 11.835.6
- DOI
-
10.18260/1-2--1369
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/1369
- Download Count
-
377
Paper Authors
Gary Crossman Old Dominion University
Gary R. Crossman is Professor and Chair of Engineering Technology at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. Professor Crossman received his B.S. degree from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy in 1964 and his M.E. degree in 1970 from Old Dominion University, where he has served on the faculty for over 34 years. Professor Crossman is a Fellow of ASEE and the recipient of the James H. McGraw Award for leadership in engineering technology education. He is also a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia
Anthony Dean Old Dominion University
Anthony W. Dean is Assistant Professor of. He received a Ph.D. in Engineering Management and a B.S. in Engineering Technology from ODU and an MBA from the College of William and Mary. Previously, Dr. Dean was Director of Operations and Business Development for Clark-Smith Associates, P.C., and served in the U.S. Navy aboard the USS South Carolina and the USS Enterprise
Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract
Introducing Engineering Technology Programs to all Incoming Freshman Engineering and Technology Students – The result is better for all
Abstract
The Department of Engineering Technology at Old Dominion University participates in a freshman engineering course sequence, along with four engineering departments in the Batten College of Engineering and Technology. The two course sequence, Exploring Engineering and Technology I and II, involve the five departments in teaching at least one five week module in each of the two courses. Each department generally involves the students in a basic design project related to its discipline. Since the Department of Engineering Technology has three main programs – Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical – it has elected to divide its five week segment into three parts to introduce the students to each of the three programs in the department.
The short time available to each program has presented some unique challenges in giving the students a meaningful experience in each program. This paper presents these challenges and how the programs within the department addressed them. The freshman course sequence has provided an excellent opportunity for the Department of Engineering Technology to provide the undecided (and, at times, the previously decided) engineering students with a viable alternative to the engineering programs. It exposes all freshmen engineers to the attributes of engineering technology education and employment opportunities.
Introduction
Retention of engineering students has become a major undertaking for most institutions with engineering programs. Much of this retention effort is taking place at the freshmen level, where dropout rates have been the highest. Institutions are developing innovative ways to maintain interest of freshmen students in their disciplines and the desire to continue.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Old Dominion University is a comprehensive Ph.D. granting institution located in Norfolk, Virginia. The Batten College of Engineering and Technology houses four engineering departments, an engineering management department and the engineering technology department. The departments are somewhat autonomous with very few shared courses. However, common to all undergraduate curricula are two credit freshman engineering courses, Exploring Engineering and Technology I and II. These courses were instituted by the dean in the late 1990’s to help stem the fairly high attrition rate of the engineering programs. At the time, each of the engineering technology programs (civil, electrical, and mechanical) had their own freshman course of two credits and didn’t really want to change. This change would add an additional two credits to the curriculum which, under university guidelines, would mean that two credits would have to be dropped elsewhere in the curriculum. Additionally, while the undergraduate engineering programs were four-year programs, with ninety percent of their students starting as new freshman, the four year engineering technology programs received a
Crossman, G., & Dean, A. (2006, June), Introducing The Engineering Technology Programs To All Incoming Freshmen Engineering And Technology Students – The Result Is Better For All Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--1369
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015