Improving Student Attitudes Toward the Capstone Laboratory Course Using Gamification

Daniel D. Burkey; Daniel D. Anastasio; Aravind Suresh

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Publication Date: June 23, 2013
Start Date: June 23, 2013
End Date: June 26, 2013
ISSN: 2153-5965
Conference Session: Real and Virtual - "New" Approaches to Teaching "Old" Courses
Tagged Division: Chemical Engineering
Page Count: 18
Page Numbers: 23.718.1 - 23.718.18
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--19732
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/19732
Download Count: 889

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Daniel D. Burkey University of Connecticut

visit author page

Daniel Burkey is the associate head of the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering department at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are chemical vapor deposition and engineering pedagogy.

visit author page

biography

Daniel D. Anastasio University of Connecticut

visit author page

Daniel Anastasio received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009. He is pursuing a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Connecticut while acting as an instructional specialist for the chemical engineering undergraduate laboratory. His research interests include osmotically driven membrane separations and engineering pedagogy.

visit author page

author page

Aravind Suresh University of Connecticut

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Introduction of Gamification Elements into a Chemical Engineering Laboratory CourseGamification, or the introduction of game-like mechanics into non-game contexts, has receivedincreasing attention recently, largely for its perceived ability to motivate participants into desiredcourses of action by making mandatory or mundane tasks rewarding in some way. Examples ofthis in the business world include frequent flyer reward programs, social programs such asFourSquare or Facebook Check In, and app-type gamification of to-do lists, weight-lossprograms, or exercise programs.Application of gamification to education is a logical extension, as it has the potential to motivatestudents to perform extra learning tasks that they might not otherwise do by couching those tasksin the larger context of a game, or by providing small but tangible non-grade rewards for theircompletion. To study this phenomenon, we chose to overlay a collaborative team-based gamecontext over the traditional senior capstone chemical engineering laboratory course. As alaboratory course, the structure is such that students are naturally clustered into teams workingon different experiments. This allowed us to easily divide the students into teams (‘guilds’ in ourexample) that were united by a common purpose – completing their major experiment. Bycompleting required tasks such as lab reports and presentations, students earned XP (experiencepoints), which translated directly into a traditional grade. In addition, other, optional tasks wereadded that could earn a student additional XP (effectively extra credit), but also another resource,called Reputation. While reputation did not affect a student’s grade directly, by workingcollectively with other students in their guild, students could pool Reputation to effectively ‘win’the game. In this context, the guild with the most reputation at the end of the semester wasallowed to choose from several rewards (dinner out with the faculty, the ability to choose anexperiment the following semester, a small boost to one of their best grades, etc.). Optional taskswere ones that the instructors thought would benefit the students, but in practice, withoutincentivization, few students attempted. Examples include peer evaluation of their work, seekingout and using external references in their writing, and performing data analysis during the courseof the experiment and using that information to modify their experimental plan.Both pre- and post-course surveys were carried out, which collected data on the students’experience with a multitude of game types, as well as their personal habits. Additionally, theirattitude and perceptions about gamification and our particular implementation were surveyedboth prior to the start of the class and after the semester ended to compare differences. This paperwill discuss the specific implementation of the gamification process as applied to the laboratorycourse, as well as make a determination as to its future course based on the outcome of thestudent surveys and level of participation. (For consideration as a paper).

Citation
Format

Burkey, D. D., & Anastasio, D. D., & Suresh, A. (2013, June), Improving Student Attitudes Toward the Capstone Laboratory Course Using Gamification Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19732

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -                         Introduction of Gamification Elements                   into a Chemical Engineering Laboratory CourseGamification, or the introduction of game-like mechanics into non-game contexts, has receivedincreasing attention recently, largely for its perceived ability to motivate participants into desiredcourses of action by making mandatory or mundane tasks rewarding in some way. Examples ofthis in the business world include frequent flyer reward programs, social programs such asFourSquare or Facebook Check In, and app-type gamification of to-do lists, weight-lossprograms, or exercise programs.Application of gamification to education is a logical extension, as it has the potential to motivatestudents to perform extra learning tasks that they might not otherwise do by couching those tasksin the larger context of a game, or by providing small but tangible non-grade rewards for theircompletion. To study this phenomenon, we chose to overlay a collaborative team-based gamecontext over the traditional senior capstone chemical engineering laboratory course. As alaboratory course, the structure is such that students are naturally clustered into teams workingon different experiments. This allowed us to easily divide the students into teams (‘guilds’ in ourexample) that were united by a common purpose – completing their major experiment. Bycompleting required tasks such as lab reports and presentations, students earned XP (experiencepoints), which translated directly into a traditional grade. In addition, other, optional tasks wereadded that could earn a student additional XP (effectively extra credit), but also another resource,called Reputation. While reputation did not affect a student’s grade directly, by workingcollectively with other students in their guild, students could pool Reputation to effectively ‘win’the game. In this context, the guild with the most reputation at the end of the semester wasallowed to choose from several rewards (dinner out with the faculty, the ability to choose anexperiment the following semester, a small boost to one of their best grades, etc.). Optional taskswere ones that the instructors thought would benefit the students, but in practice, withoutincentivization, few students attempted. Examples include peer evaluation of their work, seekingout and using external references in their writing, and performing data analysis during the courseof the experiment and using that information to modify their experimental plan.Both pre- and post-course surveys were carried out, which collected data on the students’experience with a multitude of game types, as well as their personal habits. Additionally, theirattitude and perceptions about gamification and our particular implementation were surveyedboth prior to the start of the class and after the semester ended to compare differences. This paperwill discuss the specific implementation of the gamification process as applied to the laboratorycourse, as well as make a determination as to its future course based on the outcome of thestudent surveys and level of participation. (For consideration as a paper).
AU  - Daniel D. Burkey
AU  - Daniel D. Anastasio
AU  - Aravind Suresh
CY  - Atlanta, Georgia
DA  - 2013/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Improving Student Attitudes Toward the Capstone Laboratory Course Using Gamification
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/19732
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--19732
ER  -