Promote Students' Understanding of Engineering Dynamics: A True/False Reasoning Practice

Shaobo Huang; John M. Mativo

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Publication Date: June 26, 2016
Start Date: June 26, 2016
End Date: June 29, 2016
ISBN: 978-0-692-68565-5
ISSN: 2153-5965
Conference Session: Statics and Dynamics in Mechanical Engineering
Tagged Division: Mechanical Engineering
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 7
DOI: 10.18260/p.25984
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/25984
Download Count: 1168

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Shaobo Huang South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

visit author page

Dr. Shaobo Huang is an Assistant Professor and the Stensaas Endowed STEM Chair in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Her research interests include student retention and academic performance in engineering, student achievement evaluation and assessment, and K-12 STEM curriculum design.

visit author page

biography

John M. Mativo University of Georgia

visit author page

Dr. John Mativo is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Dynamics is a challenging course for many engineering students. Last year, 15- 20% of the students who enrolled in dynamics did not pass the course (received a grade of D or lower) at a 4-year engineering college in the Midwestern U.S. Students indicated that this course was challenging because of two primary reasons: the requirement of mathematical skills and the “understanding” of the concepts and principles. Students mentioned that they could not develop the connections between specific problems and the dynamics principles due to their superficial understanding.

Concept inventories are a tool that can help promote students’ understandings of engineering courses. However, there are limited resources of valid concept inventories and the questions may not cover all topics in engineering dynamics. Furthermore, concept inventories requires students to abstract the concepts from a set of questions, which is not explicit enough to trigger deeper thinking in some students especially in those who may fail the course.

To promote students’ thinking over the concepts/principles in dynamics and to understand students’ misunderstandings, this study adapted/developed a set of conceptual true or false questions for dynamics. The topics include various motions in kinematics, Newton’s second law of motion, work and energy, and linear/angular impulse and momentum for particles and rigid bodies. Each true or false question is followed by a reasoning practice. Besides judging the correctness of a statement, the students need to explain the reason(s) and/or list one example to support/against the statement. Six to ten questions were designed at the end of each session in the dynamics course. Students were asked to work individually for 10-15 minutes and then join team discussions for 15 minutes. A different color of pen is required if a student would like to change his/her answers during a discussion.

To analyze the data, students’ responses were grouped in cohorts according to their scores in a pretest at the beginning of the semester as well as the scores gained from the homework assignments. By comparing and analyzing cohort-student responses in the individual and team practices, a preliminary model of misunderstandings in dynamics was created. Students’ achievement in the current semester (experimental group) was compared with that in the previous semester (control group). The results suggest that this practice effectively promotes students’ learning of dynamics course.

Citation
Format

Huang, S., & Mativo, J. M. (2016, June), Promote Students' Understanding of Engineering Dynamics: A True/False Reasoning Practice Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25984

TY - CPAPER
AB - Dynamics is a challenging course for many engineering students. Last year, 15- 20% of the students who enrolled in dynamics did not pass the course (received a grade of D or lower) at a 4-year engineering college in the Midwestern U.S. Students indicated that this course was challenging because of two primary reasons: the requirement of mathematical skills and the “understanding” of the concepts and principles. Students mentioned that they could not develop the connections between specific problems and the dynamics principles due to their superficial understanding.

Concept inventories are a tool that can help promote students’ understandings of engineering courses. However, there are limited resources of valid concept inventories and the questions may not cover all topics in engineering dynamics. Furthermore, concept inventories requires students to abstract the concepts from a set of questions, which is not explicit enough to trigger deeper thinking in some students especially in those who may fail the course.

To promote students’ thinking over the concepts/principles in dynamics and to understand students’ misunderstandings, this study adapted/developed a set of conceptual true or false questions for dynamics. The topics include various motions in kinematics, Newton’s second law of motion, work and energy, and linear/angular impulse and momentum for particles and rigid bodies. Each true or false question is followed by a reasoning practice. Besides judging the correctness of a statement, the students need to explain the reason(s) and/or list one example to support/against the statement. Six to ten questions were designed at the end of each session in the dynamics course. Students were asked to work individually for 10-15 minutes and then join team discussions for 15 minutes. A different color of pen is required if a student would like to change his/her answers during a discussion.

To analyze the data, students’ responses were grouped in cohorts according to their scores in a pretest at the beginning of the semester as well as the scores gained from the homework assignments. By comparing and analyzing cohort-student responses in the individual and team practices, a preliminary model of misunderstandings in dynamics was created. Students’ achievement in the current semester (experimental group) was compared with that in the previous semester (control group). The results suggest that this practice effectively promotes students’ learning of dynamics course.
AU - Shaobo Huang
AU - John M. Mativo
CY - New Orleans, Louisiana
DA - 2016/06/26
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Promote Students' Understanding of Engineering Dynamics: A True/False Reasoning Practice
UR - https://peer.asee.org/25984
DO - 10.18260/p.25984
ER -