New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
June 29, 2016
978-0-692-68565-5
2153-5965
Environmental Engineering Division: Curricula, Criteria, Student Performance, and Growth
Environmental Engineering
13
10.18260/p.26488
https://peer.asee.org/26488
531
LTC Phil Dacunto is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point, NY. He earned a Ph.D. in the field of environmental engineering at Stanford University in 2013.
It often seems that instructors can predict who the best performers in a particular course will be by looking at their grades coming into the course. Those with the best grades coming into the course, the “good” students, usually seem to end up on top. However, does that relationship actually exist, or is it just a perception? Likewise, can we predict student performance in an engineering program based on their grades in certain classes (or the core curriculum as a whole) prior to entering the program? This paper seeks to answer those questions by analyzing grade data from several courses, and one engineering program. The course grade and program performance data came from 91 environmental engineering majors at an undergraduate teaching institution in classes graduating over a six-year period. Results of linear regression analysis of final course grades or program grade point averages (GPAs) against GPAs of the same students coming into the course or program are reported. In addition, the relationship between particular courses or sets of courses (for example, math and science courses only) taken previously and overall GPA in the major is explored. While all relationships were significant (p < 0.005), several were more useful in predicting future performance. A particularly strong relationship was found between an environmental chemistry course and overall performance in the environmental engineering major (R2 = 0.77); the relationships between overall performance in the major with 1st term GPA or 1st term math and chemistry grades were useful as well (R2 = 0.48 and 0.52, respectively). Finally, 40% of students with 1st term GPAs less than 2.0 did not complete the full ABET curriculum, whereas all with 1st-term GPAs greater than 2.0 did. Understanding these relationships is important because by identifying students who may be at risk of performing poorly prior to or at the beginning of a particular course or engineering program, instructors and advisers can be ready to offer early assistance or objective evidence of how students with similar entering grades performed.
Dacunto, P. (2016, June), Academic "Predestination": Does It Exist? Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26488
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015