New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
June 29, 2016
978-0-692-68565-5
2153-5965
Engineering Ethics
Diversity
11
10.18260/p.26644
https://peer.asee.org/26644
542
Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University
Previously member of the faculty at U.S. Military Academy and Louisiana State University.
Two time Fullbright Scholar -- Italy and Germany.
The present work seeks to develop a new paradigm for engineering education, one located at the interstitial layer between the service learning and contemplative pedagogies. From service learning, we shall borrow the important notion of engineering by its very nature as a service profession embedded in a community while from contemplative theory, we shall borrow the notions of the trust and the ability to listening to the often muted voices found in a community. Each pedagogy holds great promise for improvement over the traditional method found in an overwhelming majority of the engineering classrooms. At the intersection of the two, an even richer approach to teaching engineering can be identified and explored. Further exploring contemplative pedagogy, it involves teaching methods designed to cultivate deepened awareness, concentration, and insight. Contemplation fosters additional ways of knowing that complement the rational methods of traditional higher education. This cultivation is the aim of contemplative pedagogy, a paradigm of teaching that includes methods designed to quiet and shift the habitual chatter of the mind to cultivate a capacity for deepened awareness, concentration, and insight.
The new paradigm is implemented in the senior level capstone design course sequence. Projects undertaken by student design teams are primarily suggested by members of local and regional non-profit and not for profit agencies that focus on meeting the needs of residents with various physical, mental and emotional challenges. Results are assessed using a range of different tools. A team of faculty and professional engineers judges the technical quality of the designs. A qualitative method was used to judge the effectiveness of the learning experience for the students. Client feedback was obtained through a series of exit interviews
Catalano, G. D. (2016, June), Engineering Education: Moving toward a Contemplative Service Paradigm Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26644
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015