Using Torch in Exploratory Signal Processing

Krista M Hill

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Publication Date: June 24, 2017
Start Date: June 24, 2017
End Date: June 28, 2017
Conference Session: COED: EE Topics
Tagged Division: Computers in Education
Page Count: 11
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29092
Permanent URL: https://strategy.asee.org/29092
Download Count: 717

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Krista M Hill University of Hartford

visit author page

Dr. Krista M. Hill is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Hartford in Connecticut. PhD and MSEE from Worcester Polytechnic Inst. in Worcester, Mass., and previously a project engineer at Digital Equipment Corp. She instructs graduate and undergraduate computer engineering computer courses, directs undergraduate and graduate research. Her current projects involve small system design, signal processing, and intelligent instrumentation.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

This research considers Torch along with two other packages that student researchers could use to assess the content in audio recordings. Our prior efforts have involved biomedical engineering undergraduate senior projects in our college. This research has application in our bowel-sounds project, which assesses abdominal sounds in newborn babies as signs of digestion. The research can potentially be used to estimate statistics, such as when a baby is crying or snoring.

Our focus has shifted, from making recordings, which are large in file size and may be several hours to two days in length, to considering the contents of the recordings. Our recorder automatically splits a session across multiple files, as a single file would likely exceed the FAT32 file system limit. Initially we used the well-known Audacity sound editor to manually select segments of a given recording for analysis.

The goal of this specific research is to consider and compare three packages, namely Torch, MATLAB, and Octave, then pick one for our next phase in research. This paper presents two examples, comparing execution times for various data set sizes. In many institutions MATLAB as well as Octave which is similar, are standard tools. I considered Torch as an alternative as it uses Lua, which is a powerful, fast, lightweight, and dynamically typed scripting language. Also, in reviewing the listing of Torch packages, there are resources for handling audio files, natural language processing, visualization, and machine learning.

The examples in this paper are straightforward and can be understood by students having an introduction to signal processing. Students in our electrical engineering program as well as biomedical engineering with electrical engineering concentration will have some experience with MATLAB scripting. They should also be able to use prewritten Torch scripts.

My role is as an instructor, planning for and directing our student work. In our next step, we will use one package to develop tools for student researchers, to first assist and eventually automate the analysis of such sound files. Given the investigative nature of our overall research, I avoided compiled languages such as C, C++, or Java, as developer convenience is more important than execution performance. Due to time limitations I was not able to consider Scilab, Scientific Python, SageMath, or a number of others.

In reviewing this research I am convinced that Torch has potential for use as a tool at the undergraduate and graduate levels. I also found that MATLAB is more robust than I suspected. We see that in some cases the performance of Torch is comparable to and in other cases exceeds that of MATLAB and Octave. Both Torch and MATLAB each have resources for handling audio and machine learning.

Citation
Format

Hill, K. M. (2017, June), Using Torch in Exploratory Signal Processing Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--29092

TY - CPAPER
AB - This research considers Torch along with two other packages that student researchers could use to assess the content in audio recordings. Our prior efforts have involved biomedical engineering undergraduate senior projects in our college. This research has application in our bowel-sounds project, which assesses abdominal sounds in newborn babies as signs of digestion. The research can potentially be used to estimate statistics, such as when a baby is crying or snoring.

Our focus has shifted, from making recordings, which are large in file size and may be several hours to two days in length, to considering the contents of the recordings. Our recorder automatically splits a session across multiple files, as a single file would likely exceed the FAT32 file system limit. Initially we used the well-known Audacity sound editor to manually select segments of a given recording for analysis.

The goal of this specific research is to consider and compare three packages, namely Torch, MATLAB, and Octave, then pick one for our next phase in research. This paper presents two examples, comparing execution times for various data set sizes. In many institutions MATLAB as well as Octave which is similar, are standard tools. I considered Torch as an alternative as it uses Lua, which is a powerful, fast, lightweight, and dynamically typed scripting language. Also, in reviewing the listing of Torch packages, there are resources for handling audio files, natural language processing, visualization, and machine learning.

The examples in this paper are straightforward and can be understood by students having an introduction to signal processing. Students in our electrical engineering program as well as biomedical engineering with electrical engineering concentration will have some experience with MATLAB scripting. They should also be able to use prewritten Torch scripts.

My role is as an instructor, planning for and directing our student work. In our next step, we will use one package to develop tools for student researchers, to first assist and eventually automate the analysis of such sound files. Given the investigative nature of our overall research, I avoided compiled languages such as C, C++, or Java, as developer convenience is more important than execution performance. Due to time limitations I was not able to consider Scilab, Scientific Python, SageMath, or a number of others.

In reviewing this research I am convinced that Torch has potential for use as a tool at the undergraduate and graduate levels. I also found that MATLAB is more robust than I suspected. We see that in some cases the performance of Torch is comparable to and in other cases exceeds that of MATLAB and Octave. Both Torch and MATLAB each have resources for handling audio and machine learning.

AU - Krista M Hill
CY - Columbus, Ohio
DA - 2017/06/24
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Using Torch in Exploratory Signal Processing
UR - https://strategy.asee.org/29092
DO - 10.18260/1-2--29092
ER -