Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Educational Research and Methods
14
10.18260/1-2--30863
https://peer.asee.org/30863
513
30 Years of service with the US Army. Retired as COL.
37 Years of services with the Federal Goverment. Retired as a Senior Excutive. Sevred as a sytems enginner. Focued on special operations and counterterrorism.
Currently teaching Electrical Enginerring at VMI.
James Squire is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute. Dr. Squire received a B.S. from the United States Military Academy and his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was awarded a Bronze Star in the Army during Desert Storm and was selected as Virginia’s Rising Star professor in 2004. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Massachusetts and Virginia and maintains an active consulting practice.
Dr. Gerald Sullivan, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute, received his B.S.M.E. from the University of Vermont and his Ph.D. from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He has held teaching positions at the University of Michigan-Dearborn, and the University of Vermont. Prior to joining the faculty at the Virginia Military Institute in the fall of 2004, he was employed by JMAR Inc. where he was involved in research and development of X-ray lithography systems for the semiconductor industry. His interests include mechanical design, acoustics applications and controls.
Classroom demonstrations have been shown to enhance student learning retention by providing greater intellectual stimulation when compared to lecture-only presentations. [Bradford 2000, Klosky 2002, Morgan 2007] Yet, comparatively little research has been conducted to determine the presentation type and style that is most effective in pedagogical demonstrations. This investigation builds upon previous work which counterintuitively found that crudely-built demonstrations devices tend to confer greater learning retention than similar professionally built devices. [Squire 2009] Specifically, we sought to determine how preference for crudely vs. professionally-built demonstrations changed with academic maturity. The current study employed a larger population of students pursuing an undergraduate degree in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) in a two by two grid of experimental groups. The rows refer to whether the students were in their freshman or sophomore years, and the columns refer to whether the students were taught using the crudely-built or professionally-built demonstrations. The results of the investigation revealed that both year groups experienced greater learning retention when the low-cost, homemade demonstrator was employed when compared to the professionally manufactured demonstrator. The results also show no significant difference in learning retention between year groups.
McCormick, T., & Squire, J. C., & Sullivan, G. (2018, June), Pedagogical Effectiveness of Classroom Demonstrations Devices Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30863
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015