Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Industrial Engineering
Diversity
18
10.18260/1-2--31318
https://peer.asee.org/31318
582
Elizabeth Kovalchuk received her BS in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering from Montana State University in 2017 while serving as a writing tutor and peer coordinator at the campus writing center. She currently works for Naval Undersea Warfare Center in Keyport, WA as an Industrial Engineer. Her research interests include engineering education, engineering management, and narrative training.
William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University (MSU). He is Associate Professor in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering and Associate Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement. His research is supported by the NSF and industry and has received numerous national and international awards. He is an elected Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and serves as an Associate Editor for both the Engineering Management Journal and Quality Approaches in Higher Education. Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development.
Writing is a critical skill for professional communication, providing a way to develop and examine ideas, and a method to test learning. When perceived as meaningful by the writer, writing is fundamental for identity formation in disciplines, such as engineering. The formation of an engineering identity is an area of increasing interest in engineering education research due to its link to student retention, particularly for those underrepresented in the profession.
In addition, industry demands that engineering graduates possess improved abilities to communicate in a variety of mediums and cross-culturally. Improved integration of writing into the technical curriculum could serve as a concrete method to develop these critical skills and attributes while potentially improving student retention. Despite these numerous benefits and efforts to increase engineering writing through efforts like Writing Across the Curriculum, it seems most engineering programs do little to engage their students in meaningful writing. This study investigates faculty perceptions regarding the role and importance of writing in undergraduate engineering curricula as a factor in writing’s integration in engineering educational practices.
This study examined faculty perceptions of writing in the Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering at Montana State University , gauged where and in what capacity writing assignments occurred across the curricula in the college, and examined faculty opinions held on writing and its relation to the technical aspects of engineering education. This study provides a baseline for understanding areas of future improvement and integration of writing into the engineering curricula.
Kovalchuk, E., & Schell, W. J. (2018, June), Writing as a Method to Build Better Engineers: Examining Faculty Perceptions of Writing’s Importance Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--31318
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015