Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Control to Chemical Engineers

Thomas Andrew Meadowcroft

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Location: Virtual On line
Publication Date: June 22, 2020
Start Date: June 22, 2020
End Date: June 26, 2021
Conference Session: Chemical Engineering in the Junior and Senior Year
Tagged Division: Chemical Engineering
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 13
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--35087
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/35087
Download Count: 1368

Paper Authors

biography

Thomas Andrew Meadowcroft Rowan University

visit author page

I am a Chemical Engineer, receiving my Bachelors degree from the University of Toronto and my Masters and PhD from M.I.T. I was a M.I.T. Chemical Engineering Practice School Station Director for 2 years following graduation, then went to work in industry. I worked for Union Camp, International Paper, General Electric, Omnova, and Dover Chemical as a Process Engineer, Process Design Engineer, and Process Control Engineer for 25 years. I began teaching as an adjunct at the University of Akron, and am now teaching full time at Rowan University. My specialty is teaching Design, Process Control, Safety, and Chemical Engineering Practice; many of my courses are with seniors. I am working on a course and textbook on Process Control Design and Practice.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Control to Chemical Engineers

Modern process plants in the chemical, oil, food, and pharmaceuticals industry are highly automated to meet modern standards of safety, productivity, quality, and environmental protection. Chemical plant operators today generally only “operate” by exception, stepping in when the automated system encounters a situation for which it is not prepared. As computers, sensors and automation have improved and decreased in price over the last 30-50 years, the process industries have invested heavily in automation. At the same time the one course that most chemical engineering undergraduates receive as part of the standard curriculum has hardly changed at all. Often titled “Process Dynamics and Control” it teaches Laplace domain analysis of simple time domain dynamic models, an introduction to linear control theory and its tools, with the culmination generally being a derivation of how to tune a single loop controller to achieve stable feedback control for a general dynamic model.

A newly minted chemical engineer working as a production engineer in a process unit will often be responsible for technical supervision of a process with hundreds of automated sensors, valves, motors and other I/O elements, including dozens of feedback loops. The stability of those loops will rarely be a concern (loop tuning can be taught empirically in an hour). A much greater challenge is to manage the complexity of this automated process. Why are all of these feedback loops present? How are sensors and control valves placed to absorb the available degrees of freedom? How do safety, quality, and environmental (SQ&E) goals translate to continuous and discrete constraints? How do you manage change and optimization in a plant operated by a control system? These are not primarily problems of analysis, but problems of design.

Process Control Design and Practice is a course that tackles the design problem of process automation. It teaches how feedback controllers are applied to manage the thermodynamic degrees of freedom to maintain a single state. The complexity of sequential logic design problems (batch plants, startup/shutdown in continuous units) is broken down into abstraction levels of unit control, equipment module control, and device control to allow modular design. Students learn to think algorithmically, breaking down complex sequences into actions and logical transitions. Batch recipes formulated by a chemist are translated to sequential unit recipes for implementation at production scale. SQ&E goals become logical statements that interpret sensor data and actuate valves, motors, or sequences. The student is taught to translate concepts recorded in process flow diagrams, piping and instrumentation diagrams, chemists’ recipes, operator procedures, and accountants’ ledgers into a control system design specification that can be executed by programmers and the people who build and maintain your process. By making students think and communicate about how chemical engineering unit operations function in time, this design course links engineering science theory to industrial practice while preparing students to practice engineering on automated processes. Whether as an elective or a replacement for the standard dynamics course, this course will better prepare chemical engineers for 21st century automated manufacturing.

Citation
Format

Meadowcroft, T. A. (2020, June), Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Control to Chemical Engineers Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35087

TY - CPAPER
AB - Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Control to Chemical Engineers

Modern process plants in the chemical, oil, food, and pharmaceuticals industry are highly automated to meet modern standards of safety, productivity, quality, and environmental protection. Chemical plant operators today generally only “operate” by exception, stepping in when the automated system encounters a situation for which it is not prepared. As computers, sensors and automation have improved and decreased in price over the last 30-50 years, the process industries have invested heavily in automation. At the same time the one course that most chemical engineering undergraduates receive as part of the standard curriculum has hardly changed at all. Often titled “Process Dynamics and Control” it teaches Laplace domain analysis of simple time domain dynamic models, an introduction to linear control theory and its tools, with the culmination generally being a derivation of how to tune a single loop controller to achieve stable feedback control for a general dynamic model.

A newly minted chemical engineer working as a production engineer in a process unit will often be responsible for technical supervision of a process with hundreds of automated sensors, valves, motors and other I/O elements, including dozens of feedback loops. The stability of those loops will rarely be a concern (loop tuning can be taught empirically in an hour). A much greater challenge is to manage the complexity of this automated process. Why are all of these feedback loops present? How are sensors and control valves placed to absorb the available degrees of freedom? How do safety, quality, and environmental (SQ&amp;amp;E) goals translate to continuous and discrete constraints? How do you manage change and optimization in a plant operated by a control system? These are not primarily problems of analysis, but problems of design.

Process Control Design and Practice is a course that tackles the design problem of process automation. It teaches how feedback controllers are applied to manage the thermodynamic degrees of freedom to maintain a single state. The complexity of sequential logic design problems (batch plants, startup/shutdown in continuous units) is broken down into abstraction levels of unit control, equipment module control, and device control to allow modular design. Students learn to think algorithmically, breaking down complex sequences into actions and logical transitions. Batch recipes formulated by a chemist are translated to sequential unit recipes for implementation at production scale. SQ&amp;amp;E goals become logical statements that interpret sensor data and actuate valves, motors, or sequences. The student is taught to translate concepts recorded in process flow diagrams, piping and instrumentation diagrams, chemists’ recipes, operator procedures, and accountants’ ledgers into a control system design specification that can be executed by programmers and the people who build and maintain your process. By making students think and communicate about how chemical engineering unit operations function in time, this design course links engineering science theory to industrial practice while preparing students to practice engineering on automated processes. Whether as an elective or a replacement for the standard dynamics course, this course will better prepare chemical engineers for 21st century automated manufacturing.

AU - Thomas Andrew Meadowcroft
CY - Virtual On line
DA - 2020/06/22
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Control to Chemical Engineers
UR - https://peer.asee.org/35087
DO - 10.18260/1-2--35087
ER -