Solomon, D., & Heckman, C. (2021, July), Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--37068

\bibitem{asee_peer_37068}
  Solomon, D., \& Heckman, C. (2021, July), \emph{Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training}
  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.
  10.18260/1-2--37068

Daniela Solomon and Christopher Heckman.  "Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training".  2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July.  ASEE Conferences, 2021.  https://peer.asee.org/37068 Internet.  12 Jan, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_37068}
  Daniela Solomon and Christopher Heckman.
  "Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training".
  \emph{2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2021.
  https://peer.asee.org/37068 Internet.  12 Jan, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_37068
author = "Daniela Solomon and Christopher Heckman"
title = "Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training"
booktitle = "2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2021"
month = "July"
address = "Virtual Conference"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/37068}
number = {10.18260/1-2--37068}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - This study investigates retracted publications in the engineering literature to identify the most common reasons for retraction. The results of this study provide a better understanding of the scholarly communications landscape in engineering and will be of particular interest to educators teaching scholarly communications practices to engineering graduate students by illustrating the common mistakes found in the engineering literature. We used Elsevier’s Scopus abstract and citation database to collect engineering publications marked as “retracted articles” as of November 2019. We found that the most common reasons for retraction were plagiarism and authorship issues, while copyright infringement, errors, and lack of reproducible results were less common. These results will help librarians understand the common reasons for retraction, and identify topics that need to be addressed in instruction settings. 
AU  - Daniela Solomon
AU  - Christopher Heckman
CY  - Virtual Conference
DA  - 2021/07/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/37068
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--37068
ER  -