Asee peer logo

Board 388: S-STEM: Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers—Lessons Learned

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Topics

Diversity and NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count

5

DOI

10.18260/1-2--43094

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/43094

Download Count

143

Paper Authors

biography

Indira Chatterjee University of Nevada, Reno

visit author page

Indira Chatterjee received her M.S. in Physics from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio in 1977 and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah in 1981. Indira is currently an Associate Dean in the College of Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno.

visit author page

biography

Kelsey Scalaro University of Nevada, Reno

visit author page

Kelsey is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. There she completed her Bachelor’s and is working on her Master of Science in mechanical engineering. Her research focuses are on undergraduate engine

visit author page

biography

Ann-Marie Vollstedt University of Nevada, Reno

visit author page

Ann-Marie Vollstedt is a teaching assistant professor for the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR). Dr. Vollstedt completed her dissertation at UNR, which focused on exploring the use of statistical process control methods to assess course changes in order to increase student learning in engineering. Dr. Vollstedt teaches courses in engineering design as well as statics and runs the Engineering Freshmen Intensive Training Program. She is the recipient of the Paul and Judy Bible Teaching Excellence Award, F. Donald Tibbitt's Distinguished Teaching Award, The Nevada Women's Fun Woman of Achievement Award, and the UNR College of Engineering Excellence Award.

visit author page

biography

Julia M. Williams Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-9463

visit author page

Dr. Julia M. Williams is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff.

visit author page

biography

Adam Kirn University of Nevada, Reno Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-5072

visit author page

Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studen

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

This paper discusses the lessons learned and some findings from formative assessment of the first four years of a five-year National Science Foundation S-STEM project entitled “Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers (CREATE)”. The project is located in the College of Engineering of a large western land-grant university and has retained 26 of the original 32 students (referred to as scholars) who were selected to be part of two cohorts of 16 each. The scholars were selected from a large pool of applicants based on academic talent and financial need. Six new scholars replaced the ones who left, with currently a total of 32 scholars in the program. Current scholars identify as 21 male, 11 female, 18 white, 8 Hispanic, 1 Black, and 5 Asian. Program numbers mirror similar enrollment trends to the College with the following exceptions: higher female and students of color enrolled. Based on qualitative data collected during focus groups conducted every semester, as well as a site visit by the external project evaluator, we highlight the following findings: 1. CREATE has contributed to development of both scholars and peer mentors as engineers via the information they have learned at the theme seminars that are required of the CREATE scholars; 2. Third-year scholars found faculty mentors more useful than peer mentors as their focus shifted to learning about job opportunities, internships, undergraduate research and graduate school; 3. Scholars’ goals have become more defined in the later years through a mentoring process that asks scholars about their goals and examines progress toward those goals; and, 4. Undergraduate research funded by CREATE has been very well received by both scholars and their research mentors. After retrospection on 4 years of running the CREATE program, we identified a few lessons learned: 1. CREATE peer mentors were vital to the scholars during the first two years, but the mentorship program would benefit from some small changes: (i) CREATE could have provided more training to the peer mentors on how to deal with scholars’ personal issues; (ii) CREATE could have assigned fewer scholar mentees to their peer mentors; (iii) Matching scholars’ majors to peer mentor majors and updating the questions that peer mentors asked their mentees were also suggested by mentors and mentees; 2. CREATE may have given information on careers and graduate school a bit too early in the program to the second cohort and hence sequencing the timing of theme seminars could have been improved. However, scholars from both cohorts have garnered internships; The mixed methods engineering educational research study that is part of the CREATE program has involved collecting quantitative survey and qualitative focus group data every semester and has resulted in several publications/presentations [1 – 4]. Recent important findings from this research are: 1. Students' perceptions of recognition changed as they gained experience with their engineering identities; 2. Students identified different performance/competence-related needs for identity growth as they went through their program; and 3. Students considered cost and their performance/competence beliefs as they made pathway decisions after they identified additional disciplinary interests. References 1. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe and A. Kirn, “A two-step model for the interpretation of meaningful recognition”, Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Virtual Conference, July 26-29, 2021. 2. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “Is this the real life? Exploring how virtual learning environments influence engineering identity”, Proceedings of the Frontiers of Engineering Conference, 2021, October 13-16, 2021, Lincoln, Nebraska. 3. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “From knowledge to doing: Changes in performance/competence beliefs of developing engineers”, Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Conference & Exposition, June 26 – 29, 2022, Minneapolis, MN. 4. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “Engineering interests dynamic major pathways”, Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Conference & Exposition, June 24 – 28, 2023, Baltimore, MD.

Chatterjee, I., & Scalaro, K., & Vollstedt, A., & Williams, J. M., & Kirn, A. (2023, June), Board 388: S-STEM: Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers—Lessons Learned Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43094

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015