Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 7: Student Evaluation and Grading
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
8
10.18260/1-2--44327
https://peer.asee.org/44327
235
Sam Splendido is a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is currently a graduate research assistant under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She earned her B.S. in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.
Andrea Gregg is a Director of Online Pedagogy and an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Penn State Mechanical Engineering department. Dr. Gregg is a research practitioner and has worked for nearly two decades in online higher education. Her interdisciplinary work is grounded in learner/learning experience design.
Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development.
Numerical metrics, such as degree conferrals, grade point average (GPA), and job placement rate are often metrics for universities, colleges, and departments as a proxy for measuring the success of students and programs alike. However, these numbers are limited: For example, if a student graduates with a 4.0 GPA but has low conceptual understanding, should that be considered success on the part of the student, the department/university, or neither? If a student graduates on time but is not psychologically well because of a hostile environment, should that be counted as success on the part of the department/university, of the student, or of neither? We would posit in both these situations, certain entities can measure victory while the holistic story is more nuanced, with the student underserved in many perspectives. Therefore, the overarching research question that will be launched by this seed grant is: How can and should holistic engineering student success be measured? The in-progress goal of our team in Mechanical Engineering at a large, research-focused institution, is to reconceptualize a metric of student success that enfolds four dimensions of student success that have been previously siloed in engineering education literature, though even within these groupings, engineering education researchers typically focus on one phenomenon at a time: Motivation (success could be measured by thriving, well-being, belongingness, grit); Curricular Attainment (success could be measured by metrics like GPA and completion rates, conceptual understanding, transfer of skills across applications); and Experiential Opportunities (success could be measured through understanding in authentic project based learning; obtaining internship experiences and undergraduate research, and job placement rates). The fourth dimension of success is considering success over time across career stages, through undergraduate degree conferral into either industry or graduate school, including the postdoctoral stage. This WIP paper will present our results to date in conducting a phenomenographic multimethod single case study, which is appropriate for deeply understanding multiple stakeholder perspectives within a bounded environment, in our case, the Department of Mechanical Engineering at [University]. The data streams we are employing strategically capitalize on the data we have readily available in the department and have access to through our faculty colleagues. Our cross-sectional data will investigate learning in traditional classrooms, labs, and design courses, the three primary modes of undergraduate education; and data from our graduate MS and PhD students, including online Master’s students. Together, we have a unique birds-eye view on holistic success.
Splendido, S., & Gregg, A., & Berdanier, C. G. P. (2023, June), Student Success in 4-D (SS4D): Toward a Holistic Understanding of Engineering Student Success in Motivation, Curricular Attainment and Experiential Opportunities across Educational Stages Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44327
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015