Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington
April 6, 2023
April 6, 2023
April 7, 2023
14
10.18260/1-2--44781
https://peer.asee.org/44781
133
Dr. Hossain is a full Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology at Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA. His research interests involve the computational and experimental analysis of lightweight space structures, composite materials, and MEMS devices.
B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University
PhD. in Mechanical Engineering, Washington State University
Dr. Larsen currently teaches mechanical engineering at Eastern Washington University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from California State University Sacramento and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Brigham Young U
Assistant Professor
Mechanical Engineering/Mechanical Engineering Technology Program
Department of Engineering & Design
Full Paper In our institution, we offer a one-quarter long “Engineering Economics” class for the Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) curriculum. This 2-credit course explores the economic principles in systematic evaluation of the benefits and costs associated with typical engineering projects. In particular, this course deals with formulating, estimating, and evaluating economic outcomes when alternatives to achieve a defined purpose are available. Therefore, the purpose of this course is to prepare our engineering students to be qualified to seek solutions to engineering problems/projects in context of economic viability. Plus, this course also helps our students to be better prepared for the Fundamental of Engineering (FE) exam. Students, taking the FE exam, are expected to get about 8 to 10 problems from Engineering Economics. All the authors of this paper have taught Engineering Economics several times. Therefore, the authors will demonstrate in this paper the course elements and the teaching methodologies in detail that each has practiced implementing the course objectives and to achieve the targeted outcomes. This course is designed in such a way so that it fits for both the ME and MET students. However, the MET students are more “hands-on” and have less mathematic knowledge than ME students. The MET students have mathematical knowledge up to Calculus II, whereas the ME students have mathematical knowledge up to Calculus IV and Differential Equations. This study will also compare the overall performance of the ME and MET students.
Hossain, N. A., & Saad, H. S., & Larsen, K. F., & Bae, H. A. (2023, April), Teaching an Undergraduate Introductory Engineering Economics Course: Successful Implementation for Students Learning Paper presented at 2023 ASEE PNW Section Conference, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington. 10.18260/1-2--44781
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015