Work in Progress: Evaluating Identified Engineering Needs through BME Student Debriefing Sessions after Clinical Immersion

Sharon Miller; Steven Higbee; Jennifer M Hatch

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Publication Date: June 22, 2025
Start Date: June 22, 2025
End Date: August 15, 2025
Conference Session: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Postcard Session (Best of WIPs)
Tagged Division: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 5
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/57489

Paper Authors

biography

Sharon Miller Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

visit author page

Sharon Miller, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She received a BS degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Purdue University and MS and PhD degrees in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her educational efforts focus on biomedical engineering discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices.

visit author page

biography

Steven Higbee Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-043X

visit author page

Steve is an Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University in Indianapolis. He received his PhD in Bioengineering from Rice University (Houston, TX) in 2013, after earning his BS and MS degrees from Purdue University (West Lafayette, IN).

visit author page

biography

Jennifer M Hatch Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

visit author page

Jennifer Hatch is a Continuing Lecturer of Biomedical Engineering in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She earned her BS and MS in Biomedical Engineering from Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis. Jennifer's research interests include developing methods for active student engagement and the mechanotransduction of bone.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Biomedical engineering (BME) immersion programs aim to provide high-impact experiences to engineers-in-training, often to reinforce or augment engineering design skill development. Specifically, clinical immersion experiences can provide BME students a structured way to realize how engineering design theory can be applied in a practical setting [1]. Clinical immersion can also amplify aspects of BME design that may not be achieved solely in the classroom, such as user need identification or awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare [2]. Assessing how students identify user needs or report their awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare can be challenging. Thus, a need exists to develop and share evidence-based practices with BME educators, toward the development of student activities that provide effective ways to identify, reinforce, and monitor student learning after clinical immersion experiences.

Reflection and debriefing are two approaches that have been used with a variety of learners in clinical settings [3], [4]. Reflection is an approach used to evaluate how learners document their observations and conceptualize how they can implement in their design practice. Debriefing is another approach that can be used to review clinical immersion and collectively question assumptions when reflecting on lived experiences [5]. Informal debriefing, specifically, is a method that has been implemented in training nurses, educators, and medical professionals and is a documented way of providing constructive feedback during a clinical learning experience [5], [6]. Our work will describe how debriefing sessions following BME student clinical immersion experiences may provide a meaningful way to demonstrate the quality of user need identification and changes in student awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare.

Our seven-week clinical summer immersion program combines clinical rotations, multi-format instruction, and team-based design to build student design skills and awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare [2]. Alongside teaming and design activities, the first week of the program invites academic and medical professionals to lead discussions with students on the topics of US city and state demographics, the innerworkings of hospitals and clinics, and healthcare system structure and stakeholders. Following this, students rotate through different clinical settings for 4-5 weeks and then reconvene for a final week of reflection, debriefing, and designing in teams. This work in progress will share how we designed and implemented two activities to facilitate informal debriefing with our summer immersion students after they completed multiple weeks of clinical rotations. The first activity, a clinical immersion debrief, guided students through ten short, individual prompts (e.g., “most educational about society”, “I had no idea about”, or “most interesting procedure”). The second activity, a needs identification debrief, required students to list identified user needs, to categorize the needs based on anticipated engineering difficulty, and to recognize needs with socioeconomic factors to consider during design.

In four years (2021-2024), our clinical immersion program has included a total of forty-four undergraduate BME participants. Our work in progress will share findings from qualitative student responses, analyzed via thematic analysis [7], to both the clinical immersion debrief (n= 35 students completed) and the needs identification debrief (n = 44 students completed) activities. Our overall goal is to identify if our program participants surface economic and/or societal considerations when prompted to informally debrief after clinical immersion.

In summary, clinical immersion programs can contribute to student awareness by providing community-engaged experiences rich with discussion of health needs, disparities, and proposed actions. Employing informal debriefing methods, such as those used in medical professional training, may provide BME students with opportunities to demonstrate awareness of socially conscious design factors. Further, our findings may guide BME educators in the development of similar activities for engineers-in-training.

Work is approved by the [redacted] IRB Protocol 2024-619.

Citation
Format

Miller, S., & Higbee, S., & Hatch, J. M. (2025, June), Work in Progress: Evaluating Identified Engineering Needs through BME Student Debriefing Sessions after Clinical Immersion Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/57489

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Biomedical engineering (BME) immersion programs aim to provide high-impact experiences to engineers-in-training, often to reinforce or augment engineering design skill development. Specifically, clinical immersion experiences can provide BME students a structured way to realize how engineering design theory can be applied in a practical setting [1]. Clinical immersion can also amplify aspects of BME design that may not be achieved solely in the classroom, such as user need identification or awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare [2]. Assessing how students identify user needs or report their awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare can be challenging. Thus, a need exists to develop and share evidence-based practices with BME educators, toward the development of student activities that provide effective ways to identify, reinforce, and monitor student learning after clinical immersion experiences.

Reflection and debriefing are two approaches that have been used with a variety of learners in clinical settings [3], [4]. Reflection is an approach used to evaluate how learners document their observations and conceptualize how they can implement in their design practice. Debriefing is another approach that can be used to review clinical immersion and collectively question assumptions when reflecting on lived experiences [5]. Informal debriefing, specifically, is a method that has been implemented in training nurses, educators, and medical professionals and is a documented way of providing constructive feedback during a clinical learning experience [5], [6]. Our work will describe how debriefing sessions following BME student clinical immersion experiences may provide a meaningful way to demonstrate the quality of user need identification and changes in student awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare. 

Our seven-week clinical summer immersion program combines clinical rotations, multi-format instruction, and team-based design to build student design skills and awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare [2]. Alongside teaming and design activities, the first week of the program invites academic and medical professionals to lead discussions with students on the topics of US city and state demographics, the innerworkings of hospitals and clinics, and healthcare system structure and stakeholders. Following this, students rotate through different clinical settings for 4-5 weeks and then reconvene for a final week of reflection, debriefing, and designing in teams. This work in progress will share how we designed and implemented two activities to facilitate informal debriefing with our summer immersion students after they completed multiple weeks of clinical rotations. The first activity, a clinical immersion debrief, guided students through ten short, individual prompts (e.g., “most educational about society”, “I had no idea about”, or “most interesting procedure”). The second activity, a needs identification debrief, required students to list identified user needs, to categorize the needs based on anticipated engineering difficulty, and to recognize needs with socioeconomic factors to consider during design. 

In four years (2021-2024), our clinical immersion program has included a total of forty-four undergraduate BME participants. Our work in progress will share findings from qualitative student responses, analyzed via thematic analysis [7], to both the clinical immersion debrief (n= 35 students completed) and the needs identification debrief (n = 44 students completed) activities. Our overall goal is to identify if our program participants surface economic and/or societal considerations when prompted to informally debrief after clinical immersion.

In summary, clinical immersion programs can contribute to student awareness by providing community-engaged experiences rich with discussion of health needs, disparities, and proposed actions. Employing informal debriefing methods, such as those used in medical professional training, may provide BME students with opportunities to demonstrate awareness of socially conscious design factors. Further, our findings may guide BME educators in the development of similar activities for engineers-in-training. 

Work is approved by the [redacted] IRB Protocol 2024-619.

AU  - Sharon Miller
AU  - Steven Higbee
AU  - Jennifer M Hatch
CY  - Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
DA  - 2025/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Work in Progress: Evaluating Identified Engineering Needs through BME Student Debriefing Sessions after Clinical Immersion 
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/57489
ER  -