Faculty of the Year award, (twice) awarded by Association of Parks College Students. He is a registered professional engineer in New York State. He is an ABET evaluator.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Dr. Sridhar Condoor is a professor, KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the editor of the Journal of En- gineering Entrepreneurship. He teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology entrepreneurship, and sustain- ability. He is spearheading technology-entrepreneurship education at SLU via the Innovation to Product (I2P), iChallenge, entrepreneurship competitions, and funded research. He is the principal
marginalized students in the engineering college, which consists of 12 disciplinary departments [1]. Our previous quantitative studyfound that students marginalized on the bases of gender, race/ethnicity, and/or household incomelevel experienced both disproportionately low representation rates and diminished outcomes. Weare interested in determining how the quantitative results are impacted by a focus specifically onaerospace engineering students.Existing research on retention of diverse students in aerospace engineering undergraduate programs is scarce. General reports of demographical representation are published annually by theAmerican Society of Engineering Education [2]. Orr et al.’s 2015 study [3] was effectively thefirst study to
Equivalence Mode Severity Remarks Action Identifier Idenifier Probability Mode Effect(s) Effect(s) Effect(s) Provision(s) Monitor Method Identifier IdentifierFigure 1. Functional FMEA Worksheet format [7]FMEA Process in AET CourseThe junior level course provides students with the concepts, processes, and tools regarding thereview and analysis of system designs. The students learn the elements of logistics and the effectof design on the maintainability, reliability, and supportability
UnitedStates was becoming aware of the need for more NDM technologies. Further, these samestakeholders recognized that more technology would only come through increased interest andcompetence in the topic(s), recognition of its importance in a public and private capacity, and as aresult of the two, increased development of exploratory engineering. Serabian’s [7] chief wonderwas thus what role engineering education would play in advancing NDM technologies.Specifically, they asked, would engineering education practice focus on whether students coulduse the relevant technologies, rather than leave that to technicians, or would the focus be onteaching students theory that would allow them to develop new technologies? At a time in whichfunding was an issue
package [12]. JuMP and the Julia language allowed for very straightforward dataprocessing, and problem setup. Once the appropriate 𝑐𝑐, 𝑠𝑠, 𝑠𝑠, 𝑟𝑟, and 𝑟𝑟 constants are created basedon the survey data, the problem above can be expressed using the following JuMP code:opt = Model()@variable(opt, x[1:n_groups, 1:n_projects], Bin)@objective(opt, Min, sum(c.*x))for i in 1:n_groups @constraint(opt, sum(x[i, :]) == 1) # constraint (3)endfor j in 1:n_projects @constraint(opt, s̲ <= s'*x[:,j] <= 𝑠𝑠̅) # constraint (4) @constraint(opt, r*x[:,j] .>= ̲r[:, j]) # constraint (5)endThe Gurobi solver was able to find optimal
Analysis of structural stability using Figure 7 column buckling 6 Fatigue Analysis of fatigue failure using rotating- Figure 8 bending specimens and exploration of safe- life design using S-N curve.Virtual Lab DescriptionFigure 3 depicts the screenshot of VL 1, Stress Analysis of I-Beams. The I-beam structure is afour-point bending virtual specimen. In this VL exercise, the users start the VL experiment bymoving the head of the press downward using either the Jog Slow or Jog Fast button to the left ofthe screen. The users can choose the speed of the head movement by using the speed adjustmentknob just above the
mid-nineties. In contrast, AE enrollment grew till 1988 and then sharply declined. The reason forthis disparity is that while engineering went through downsizing and mergers, 1980’s was adynamic time for aerospace engineering [8]. Truly the eighties were an exciting time for AEindustry where the U.S. increased its funding in the sector to almost excessive [9]. Followingthis period of excessive spending, the sector faced huge downsizing due to the slash infunding and recession. To put it in perspective, the AE sector slashed half a million jobs from1989 to 1995 [9]. Undergraduate enrollment in AE followed similar trends to that of itsindustry. Fletcher (1998) warned that the sharp decline in enrollment in AE will have seriousconsequences on
format is especially helpful for students near the cutofffor a passing grade whose initial midterm performance may be discouraging to the point ofwithdrawal.References[1] M. A. Eppler, C. Carsen-Plentl, and B. L. Harju, “Achievement Goals, Failure Attributions, and Academic Performance in Nontraditional and Traditional College Students,” J. Soc. Behav. Pers., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 353–372, 2000.[2] E. S. Elliot and C. S. Dweck, “Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 1988, doi: 10.1080/02109395.1989.10821105.[3] C. Midgley et al., “Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Sciences (PALS),” Pals, pp. 734–763, 2000.[4] C. S. Dweck and E. L. Leggett, “A
. T. Barrett-Lennard, “The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept.” Journal of counseling psychology, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 91, 1981. [7] C. R. Rogers, “Empathic: An unappreciated way of being,” The Counseling Psychologist, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2–10, 1975. [8] R. R. Carkhuff and B. G. Berenson, Beyond counseling and therapy. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967. [9] N. D. Feshbach and S. Feshbach, “Empathy in education,” in The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, J. Decety and W. Ickes, Eds. Massachusetts: The MIT Presss, 2009, ch. 7, pp. 85–97.[10] A. F. Chang, S. E. Berger, and B. Chang, “The relationship of student self-esteem and teacher empathy to classroom learning.” Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 1981.[11
[Accessed January 28, 2021].[6] ABET, “ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/ [Accessed August 8, 2019][7] B.A. Oakley, D.M. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R.M. Felder, “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results from a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007.[8] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, “Teaching Teamwork in Engineering and Computer Science,” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, 2011.[9] M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and D.J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of
Summer 2020 semester, this limited research has been very useful in understanding theneeds of the students. Due to his engagement in such a flipped classroom model research, theauthor at his current institution lead the effort to transition his department faculty to an onlinemedium of instruction. For his efforts, the author received high accolade from his departmenthead and colleagues. References1. Maxwell, J. C. (2007), The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow them and People will Follow You, 10th Anniversary Edition, Thomas Nelson, Nashville, TN.2. Maxwell, J. C. (2011), The 5 Levels of Leadership: Proven Steps to Maximize Your Potential, 1st Edition, Center Street New York, NY.3. Asundi, S
the simulator, the team will design astreamlined process using X-Plane 11. They will be able to select various parameters and enterdimensions to create their own custom aircraft. Some of these parameters include engine power,maximum coefficient of lift, wing taper ratio, stall speed, and many more. Using two resources,Dan Raymer’s Simplified Aircraft Design for Homebuilders, 3 and Aircraft Design: A ConceptualApproach, 4 as well as knowledge gained from the aircraft design class at ORU, the studentsshould be able to define the necessary variables in X-Plane 11’s “PlaneMaker” software. Then,once the airplane is complete, the students will be able to accurately experience flying theircustom plane.As an additional feature to assist people who
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 accelerometer readings. Comparison between Time (S) test flight data and simulation for the smaller Figure 3. Experimentally determined thrust curve Magnum Hornet rocket (Figure 4a) is shown in for an Estes D-12 solid model
," [Online]. Available: http://www.aneaes.gov.py/v2/application/files/4215/3356/6368/Criterios_de_calidad_Ingenierias.pdf. [Accessed 2021].[2] Facultad de Ingeniería, BUAP, "Gruppo de Ciencas Espaciales," [Online]. Available: https://sites.google.com/site/gcespacialesfibuap/home/-que-son-las-ciencias-espaciales. [Accessed 2021].[3] C. P. S. U. Cal Poly, CubeSat Design Specification Rev. 13, San Luis Obispo, California: The CubeSat Program, 2014.[4] TWI Ltd, "TWI Global," [Online]. Available: https://www.twi-global.com/technical- knowledge/faqs/what-is-petg. [Accessed 2021].[5] J. Velásquez, "MyOpenLab Software," 2017. [Online]. Available: https://myopenlab.org/inicio
Students Collate and distribute peer-review comments 7 March Instructor Slides/Posters Due 11 March Students Oral Presentation Session(s)* 14 March All Poster Session* 19 March All Peer Review Response and Updated Paper Due* StudentsCase Study 3: The Funding ProposalFor the third case study, graduate students in a graduate elective class in advanced propulsionsystems (AERO 570 at California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly))responded to a fictional funding call from a fictional research agency (see
leaders to enhancethe leadership and management skills. It is important to emphasize to the HODA leaders that thestudents doing the HODA are not to be told which archetype(s) are applicable. The studentsshould be allowed to experience the systems archetypes and think for themselves whicharchetype fits best. While it would be faster and easier if students were told which archetypes arepresent in the HODA, it is important at the graduate level that the students be allowed to usehigher orders of thinking to identify the archetypes, discuss options with the class members, andpresent their evidence as to which archetypes fit best.DebriefingThe debriefing aims to inspire students to extract experience and observations related to systemsthinking from
the game would benefit from collaborationwith educators who can provide insights to a young student’s mind. Moving forward, the authors areworking with more teachers, especially those who do not have a background in aerospace, to obtainfeedback. Hopefully, approvals will be granted soon to allow students playing the game to be surveyed toobtain a richer set of feedback.AcknowledgementsSupport for this project was graciously provided by NSF project REvolutionizing Diversity OfEngineering (REDO-E) (project 1730693).References[1] Data USA: Aerospace Engineers. 2018.[2] Elam, M. E., Donham, B. L., & Soloman, S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program forunderrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education
competition either as part of student teams or asfaculty advisor. The competition website includes competition guidelines, evaluation rubric,submission files to be part of the design proposal, winning packages, resources to help studentteams, and deadlines [1].Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) conducts an annual airport design competitionfor university-level students in which U.S. student teams propose innovative designs to solvechallenges facing U.S. airports [1]. Undergraduate and/or graduate students are eligible toparticipate in the competition either as part of a course or as an independent project with facultysponsor(s). The students, either individually or in a team, prepare a 40-page design packageproposal addressing innovative
quadcopter family,” IoT S P 2017 - Proc. 2017 Work. Internet Things Secur. Privacy, co-located with CCS 2017, no. Ii, pp. 31–36, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3139937.3139943.[17] C. G. Leela Krishna and R. Murphy, “A review on cybersecurity vulnerabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles,” Auvsi Xponential 2018, pp. 0–5, 2018.[18] D. Rainer, “Code corner,” Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 39–40, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chs.2005.05.008.[19] Interagency Security Committee, “Protecting Against The Threat of Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” 2020.
Laboratory Adv Advanced Lin Linear AN Aeronautical or Aeronautical Engineering LTU Lawrence Technological University App Application(s) Manuf Manufacturing Arch Architecture ME Mechanical Engineering AS Aerospace Engineering Mech Mechanics Assoc. Associate’s (degree) Meth Methods Assy Assembly NASA National Air and Space Agency Auto Autonomous NL