Exposition, ConferenceProceedings. Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28298.Feister, M. K. et al. (2016) ‘Integrating ethical considerations in design’, ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Conference Proceedings. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences. doi: 10.18260/p.25804.Gunnarsson, C., Birch, C. and Hendricks, D. G. (2019) ‘Work in progress: Curriculum on diversity andethics: Impact in an introductory bioengineering course’, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Conference Proceedings. Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32340.Hutchison, K. (2019) ‘Gender Bias in Medical Implant Design and Use: A Type of Moral AggregationProblem?’, Hypatia, 34(3), pp. 570–591. doi: 10.1111/hypa.12483.Lord, S. M. and Chen, J
, Value, and Identity Beliefs,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2020.[3] J. Rohde, J. France, B. Benedict, and A. Godwin, “Exploring the early career pathways of degree holders from biomedical, environmental, and interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, 2020.[4] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered interests in electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering: Intersections with career outcome expectations,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, 2018.[5] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad, and B. Belmont, “What is Biomedical Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2019.[6] A. Fakis, R
components toprogramming coursework [2]. This study is limited by participation bias and a limited ability tocompare student responses to performance in the course. Improvement in the latter would enablevaluable, quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of this teaching strategy in both virtual andF2F modalities. This will be addressed in future work by collecting student demographicinformation and paired course academic data as part of the analysis.References[1] B. G. Hawkins and J. Eason, "Laboratory Course Development for Biomedical Signals and Systems," in ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Meeting, Los Angeles, 2019.[2] A. Alammary, "Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review," PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no
students would only know ifthey had gotten a hands-on experience operating the machines. Becausethe exams are nearly identical, we can compare to the virtual setting examresults (2020) to the non-virtual results (2019). This is one method toquantitatively assess student learning. Moreover, students were alsoinvited to complete an anonymous survey regarding the efficacy of thevirtual course. The survey included seventeen questions (Table 2,appendix) using a Likert scale to quantitatively assess the effectiveness ofthe virtual offering. The questions inquired about the course objectives,course materials, and machine operational confidence. They were asked to Figure 2: Virtual course module structure. Therate how strongly they agree or disagree with
the class (Fig 2A). Students were supplied with scissors, blank whiteposters and glue. In addition, students were allowed to bring their own supplies such as printoutsand markers. Each group gave a 2 min pitch and were assessed based on the innovation, posterlayout, and presentation skills. All the groups were encouraged to ask questions during thegallery walk as well as vote for their favorite product. This gave students an opportunity toprovide constructive feedback and learn from the work of their peers.Fig. 2: Student posters displaying product innovation. (A) Poster created in 2019 by studentspresenting a concept to help quit smoking by providing a therapy program (text-a therapist). (B)Slide created in 2020 by students showcasing
a variety of fields [2] and have yielded improved graduate student performancespecifically in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology [3]. To address the challenge ofengaging the wide diversity of incoming physiology experience among our graduate students, wedeveloped a partially flipped graduate physiology course that emphasized mathematicalmodeling and computational exercises in class. In this Work-in-Progress paper, we will describethe pedagogical approach and preliminary analysis of learning outcomes and student feedbackfrom the past two iterations of this flipped course.Flipped classroom approach to engineering graduate physiologyIn 2019 and 2020, a total of 53 graduate students were enrolled in the core EngineeringPhysiology
meetings and design notebooks as tools for reflection in the engineering design course," in Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference, 2006: IEEE, pp. 7-12.[7] H. A. Diefes-Dux, "Student reflections on standards-based graded assignments," in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016: IEEE, pp. 1-5.[8] Diefes-Dux and Cardberry, "Cases of Student Reflection within a Course Using Standards-Based Grading," IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-9, 2019.[9] M. Menekse, G. Stump, S. Krause, and M. Chi, "The effectiveness of students' daily reflections on learning in engineering context," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2011
people to talk about.” 2019 “I was able to think about social justice issues that I hadn’t thought about or wasn’t even aware about before. I gained insight into the issues that certain marginalized groups face, and I was even able to reflect on my own actions and the consequences of my own biases.” 2019 “Amazing class and I’m so glad I took it. I think everyone in STEM should have to take it, I feel like I am a more conscious citizen and that I am more interested in using my STEM degree in the future to help people and make change.” 2019 “[This class] made me reconsider my biases and actively think through how my work as an engineer affects people who don’t live where I do, don’t live life like I do, and don’t have the same socioethnic [sic
articulated.Peer Evaluation: Two times during the quarter (week 4 and 9), students evaluated theirteammates using the CATME peer evaluation tool. In this online peer evaluation tool, studentsrated their peers (1 to 5) in each of the following areas: Contributing to team, Interactions withteam, Keeping team on track, Expecting quality, and Having knowledge, skills and assets.Quantitative individual team member scores from the second peer evaluation were compared toaggregated scores from the four previous course offerings (2016-2019).Figure 1. Timeline of asset-based activities within context of quarter long team-based designproject. Weekly class sessions in which activities were completed were 3-hour TA-led virtualdiscussion sections. *CATME Peer
Students Gratitude, Meaning, and Mindfulness," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[11] M. M. V. Huerta, "Inner Engineering: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study Evaluating the Use of Contemplative Practices to Promote Resilience Among Freshman Engineering Students," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[12] I. Miller and K. Jensen, "Introduction of Mindfulness in an Online Engineering Core Course During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Advances in Engineering Education, 2020.[13] D. Eisenberg and K. Zivin, "Stigma and help seeking for mental health among college students," Medical care research and review, vol. 66, pp. 522-541, 2009.[14] R.A. Vidourek, K.A. King, L.A. Nabors, and A.L. Merianos
of COVID. It was difficult to interact with students or to gain spontaneous remoteresponses to ethical dilemmas.I.4. An Old Dog Learns New TricksIn the last five years and after 35 years of university teaching, the instructor was finally able topartake in three different seminars/ workshops on teaching effectiveness. These greatly helped innavigating COVID changes. 1. 2016 ASEE workshop Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education;8-9 2. A 2-day fall 2019 Quality Matters (QM) workshop offered by this paper’s coauthors. 3. A university Summer 2020 course Reframing Instruction for Success for Everyone.7I.4.A. The instructor attended the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education(CPREE) workshop at the 2016
. 1887-1894, 2020.[7] R. M. Reck, "BYOE: Affordable and portable laboratory kit for controls courses," in ASEE 2015 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015. .[8] K. Jensen and P. Jensen, "Work in progress: Alternative lab reports for biomedical engineering," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[9] M. N. Jawad, A. Bhattacharjee, R. Lehmann, A. Busza, P. Perez-Pinera, and K. Jensen, "Remote Laboratory Exercise to Develop Micropipetting Skills," Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, vol. 22, 2021.[10] Gibco Cell Culture Basics. Available: https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/gibco-cell-culture-basics.html
/biomedical engineering education and career development: Literature review, definitions, and constructive recommendations,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 990–1011, 2008.[10] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad, and B. Belmont, “What is biomedical engineering? Insights from qualitative analysis of definitions written by undergraduate students,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[11] R. A. Linsenmeier, “What makes a biomedical engineer?,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 32–38, 2003.[12] D. Gatchell and R. Linsenmeier, “VaNTH Biomedical Engineering Key Content Survey, Part Two. The 2nd Step in a Delphi Study to determine the core undergraduate BME curriculum,” Am