Paper ID #34862WIP: Supporting Student Mental Health: Understanding the Use ofBiometrics Analysis in an Engineering Design Project to Promote WellnessIsabel Miller, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Isabel Miller (she/her) is pursuing a MS in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, having received her Bachelors in Bioengineering in 2021 from UIUC. She is interested in student mental health and wellness.Sara Xochilt Lamer, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Sara Lamer (she/her) is a junior studying Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. She is
Paper ID #33650Work in Progress: Creative Biomechanics Project Using an InteractiveDigital Experience as an Alternative Laboratory (IDEAL) – Phase 2Dr. Elizabeth Mays, Michigan State University Elizabeth earned her BSE and MSE in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. She then earned her PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Elizabeth is currently a Post-doctoral Research Associate at Michigan State University, with a focus on Engineering Education research, specifically with using creative teaching methods to encourage student engagement, learning, and
California, Irvine (UCI) American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Novel Initiatives for Senior Design Collaborative Projects with Healthcare Workers and Undergraduate Students – a COVID-19 Response Nursing HackathonIntroduction:Nurses and healthcare staff are uniquely positioned to identify opportunities to improve systemsof care delivery but are often underrepresented in medical innovation initiatives [1, 2].Furthermore, although hackathons have gained traction over the past decade as a successfulinnovation tool to tackle modern healthcare problems [3], there remains a lack of events thatallow undergraduate students in different
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Applying the framework of Fink’s taxonomy to the design of a holistic culminating assessment of student learning in biomedical engineeringAbstractA cohort of junior biomedical engineering students concurrently enrolled in Biomechanics,Biomaterials, and an associated lab class (BME Labs) were assigned a comprehensive, fullyimmersive final project in lieu of final exams. In a typical quarter, Biomechanics andBiomaterials culminate in a traditional 2-4 hour final exam, while BME Labs terminates in acondensed 2-week design mini-project. This integrated final project was motivated by studentfeedback regarding their
approachI. AbstractMATLAB programming projects are assigned in the Vanderbilt University IntroductoryBiomechanics course to strengthen coding skill and demonstrate application of theory topractice. In course evaluations, students consistently rate these projects as the most challengingand difficult to grasp, citing the inefficacy of the traditional (lecture-only) course in mergingprogramming with biomechanics content. Moving material online is an intuitive solution to thiscomputation-based instructional challenge. Literature has shown that blended classes (30-80%online) can improve academic performance compared to in-person or online classes alone. Whilevery few studies have analyzed blended learning in biomedical engineering contexts, research
increased K-12 STEM awareness and education. Prior to joining UC Davis, Jennifer taught in the BME Department at Rutgers University, and was a postdoctoral fellow at Advanced Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, LLC. She received her doctoral degree in Biomedical Engineering from Tufts University, M.S. degree from Syracuse University, and B.S. degree from Cornell University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Promoting equitable team dynamics in an introductory biomedical engineering courseIntroductionTeam-based projects are widely utilized in the engineering curriculum, and often used inintroductory
testingprototypes. Several prototyping milestones were completed throughout each semester with thefinal deliverable being a team produced video presenting each team’s solution to the problem.Online and in-person learning activities were simultaneously applied throughout the semesterincluding the IDEO design thinking approach in order for each team to develop and practicedesign-oriented skills [10]. In addition to the team projects and coursework, students were able toparticipate in a university design challenge that promoted adaptive needs and inclusion of peoplewith disabilities in engineering. Each team developed a challenge or activity in whichparticipants attempted to complete a daily living activity with an applied constraint simulating aspecific
artsinstitution initiated a comprehensive feasibility report for a new and innovative biomedicalengineering program. The feasibility report included assessment of growth of the bioscienceindustry, cohesion with existing programs at the institution, potential students, and current trendsand future needs. Based on the outcomes of the report, a new undergraduate biomedicalengineering (BME) program was established with an innovative and unique curriculum. Theinnovative nature of the new program is demonstrated through the utilization of liberal artspedagogical practices and interventions, 4 credit hours courses, the background and training of theprograms 3 faculty members, a project-based curriculum, and the program emphases on analytics
, developedby our department in 2008, which is a highly interactive apprenticeship learning environment inwhich students work in a stable team of four for the entire semester. In this intervention, studentsare challenged to consider bias in engineering design and its impacts on others through a semester-long project composed of a series of individual and team exercises. This intervention is designedto raise students’ awareness of bias in biomedical engineering designs and processes and theimpacts they have on them and on others.Demand for inclusive design and responsible innovationEngineers’ works significantly affect the world, so they should be aware of assumptions they makewhen they create a new product. It means that consideration of inclusive
Article ReadingPre-departure symposium Following the 10-week training program, students will meet at the University of SanDiego (USD) for a 4-day pre-departure symposium designed to prepare the IRES participants fortheir research projects. The topics covered during this symposium will begin with generalprinciples that are applicable to all IRES participants and conclude with individualized codingsessions that are specific to each student’s project (Table 2). The first day will focus onwelcoming the students, discussing career paths in bioinformatics and include a special sessionfrom the on-campus international center. Since a main goal of this program is to encouragematriculation onto graduate school, a large portion of the first day will
and a team project in which they design a scientific orengineering solution that promotes social justice.Learning ObjectivesWe explore social justice in a science and engineering context, with a focus on DEI(diversity, equity, and inclusion). We discover why scientists and engineers must practiceinclusive design and think broadly about the impact of their work on diverse populations,including ethical implications, potential inequities in access, and bias againstunderrepresented people.By the end of the course, students should be able to: 1. Identify how cultural concepts of race, gender, sexuality, and disability have shaped scientific thought and engineering practice (and vice versa) through history. 2. Conduct self-directed
studies. [4] With the exception of ‘founder’, having an entrepreneurial parent had no effectas well. These results differ from Li et al., who stated that having close entrepreneurial relatives waspositively aligned with increases in entrepreneurial mindset. However, their definition of entrepreneurialmindset encompassed all of our EEI. There seems to be a movement of student interest from ‘inventor’ to‘developer’ in general as students work through innovative, open-ended projects, such as senior capstoneor our introductory bioengineering final project. Students who identified as having previousentrepreneurial experience demonstrated a greater affinity for ‘founder’ and ‘developer’ than studentswho did not claim this experience. The previous
traditional 3-credit hour courses. Biomedical Electronics, a 3-credit hourjunior level course, was already progressing toward a flip-classroom model on a 4-year timeline.The goal of this project is to determine if transition to a flipped learning model classroom and rearrangement of course After Flip materials would improve student Before Flip (2019- present) learning outcomes in a (2018) Course Learning Outcomes • 5 summative • 2 summative biomedical electronics course
supportsmultiple training and education needs related to data analytics across biopharmaceuticalmanufacturing hubs. As a first-step, our project identified a subset of achievable near-term tasksand objectives needed to develop and pilot an introductory series of active-learning boot campsdesigned to upskill incumbent employees serving in established biomanufacturing scientific andengineering roles (e.g. not trained data scientists) to utilize multivariate analysis tools and extractvalue from complex data sets. Our proposed solution is differentiated by its active collaborationwith industry, and commitment to mentored employee knowledge integration into corporateworkflows.Objectives and Value PropositionsWe propose the development of a workforce
applicationsIntroductionMachining and manufacturing are essential skills that engineering students learn during theirundergraduate education to prepare them for their future careers in academia or industry.Because of the unique circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic, biomedical engineering(BME) educators have been challenged with developing modified curricula to accommodaterestrictions or prohibitions on in-person courses. The UC Davis BME introductory machiningand manufacturing course has traditionally employed a hands-on approach to teach students thenecessary skills needed to apply to the prototyping of their senior design projects. However, dueto prohibitions on in-person instruction, the BME machining course underwent significantredesign to enable an entirely
scientists and engineers, laboratory and design notebooksrecord a project from its start to completion. When done well, these notebooks are an inherentlyreflective practice on one’s own learning, understanding, and decision-making process [6]. Wehypothesize that reflection, especially if done while learning (e.g., lab notebooks) in addition toreflection after receiving SBG feedback, will improve student mastery in “problemidentification” and “interpretation”.This work-in-progress aims to determine if there are differences in mastery (quantified bystandards-based grading of lab reports) across different reflection implementations (post-assignment reflections, post-assignment reflections + reflection while doing with laboratorynotebook). In addition
evaluation of various biomedical samples and constructs, with an educational background in CT and MRI imaging. Mr. Caccese’s research interests include the anthropometry of device usage, computational modeling of different bodily systems, and statistical evaluation of varying data sets. As a consultant, Mr. Caccese applies his knowledge to assist with the analyses of injury causations and accident reconstructions for a variety of projects. He assesses whether motions, accelerations, and loads can cause injury, and his experience includes contributing to analyses and reconstructions of motor vehi- cle crashes; sports, and occupational injuries; and falls. He also contributes to biomechanical analyses of incidents involving
setting. Lab space was limited to~16-18 students per room, with two rooms available to the two sections of the lab. While themajority of students enrolled in the F2F section of the class, various restrictions and quarantineevents for students living on campus meant that a sizeable portion of students might beparticipating virtually during a given week. To accommodate the varying needs of all thesestudents, the introductory and expository portions of the course were streamed live and recordedvia the Zoom web conferencing platform. The instructor would deliver a prelab lecture and discussmaterial in one room with the content streamed live and projected in the second laboratory room.Students working remotely could follow along synchronously and all
Paper ID #33742Facilitating Student Metacognition Using Exam Wrappers and Concept Mapsin a Problem Solving-based BME CourseDr. Rucha Joshi, University of California, Davis Rucha Joshi, Ph.D., Biomedical Engineering, is a faculty in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at UC Davis, CA, focusing on engineering education research and instructional innovation in Biomedical Engineering. Prior to joining UC Davis in 2018, she was post-doctoral fellow in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue, working on multiple educational projects in enhancing teaching, learn- ing, outreach, and diversity of engineers
work/discussion because its good practice for jobs that require teamwork” shows thatmodule participation helped students to recognize the importance of EM skills, influencing theirfuture endeavors.3.3 Social ImpactConceptualizing future technology and services that create value for society is an importantaspect of the entrepreneurial mindset [13]. Societal and environmental motivation leads tocognitive awareness which is about finding the needs, exploring ideas, and applying availableresources to create a business model. This module was able to connect the students to a socialissue as evidenced by their comments: “relevance to college students, many of my friends eithersmoke or vape so this issue of quitting smoking connected” and “project
almost evenly split between White and Asian students. In addition to race, theREU group had more students with both parents with lower education levels and at lower socio-economic standing. Even with this increase in diversity, 50% of the students in the REU programhad a moderate amount (six months to two years) of previous research experience. Approximatelyhalf of the students in each cohort reported having previous ethics training.Research DesignA major part of the project was developing an ethical survey tool specific to biomedicalengineering. First, we developed survey materials to measure respondents’ situational ethics bycreating five short scenarios, each of which presents an ethical situation relevant to biomedicalengineering research