each breakout group, students would work in small groups (<15 students each) to hold deeper conversations about different elements of environmental injustice. ● Friday’s class period (10/30/2020) would consist of a guest presentation by two members of UCCO, followed by a 15-minute Q&A portion, where students could appreciate the perspective of a group leading in environmental activism. Topics would include environmental racism in Connecticut and Puerto Rico as well as the climate movement taking place on the university’s campus.Figure 1. Comparison of EJ week to the rest of the course Monday Wednesday Friday Average Week in the
USD and the broader San DiegoEvents justice and encourage and facilitate critical community. Events typically feature a reflection on current practice. speaker or a panel of speakers, followed by discussion/Q+A. Professionals across all disciplines are invited Engagement through invitations toPro Bono to contribute their expertise, time and participate in ExSJ ProfessionalProfessional resources towards projects in support of Development events and CommunityNetwork communities, social and environmental Forums, as well as collaboration on ExSJ justice
. Routledge, 2019.[18] N. N. Jones, K. R. Moore, and R. Walton, “Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 2252, no. 4, pp. 211–229, 2016.[19] “Anti-racist scholarly reviewing practices: A heuristic for editors, reviewers, and authors.” 2021.[20] “Five Faces of Oppression* IRIS MARION YOUNG,” 2014.[21] L. Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodology: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 2nd ed. New York: Zen Books, 2012.[22] K. Dotson, “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing,” Hypatia, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 236–257, Mar. 2011.[23] I. Young, Justice and the Politics of Justice. Princeton University Press, 2014.[24] K. Chavez
underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology,engineering, and math,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp.6476-6483, 2020.[5] C. Baillie, A. Pawley, and D. Riley, Engineering and social justice: In the university andbeyond. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2012.[6] D. Riley, “Engineering and social justice,” Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, andSociety, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-152, 2008.[7] K. Scheidgen, “Social contexts in team formation,” Historical Social Research/ HistorischeSozialforschung, vol. 44, no. 4 (170), pp. 42-74, 2019.[8] S. C. Hsu, K. W. Weng, Q. Cui, and W. Rand, “Understanding the complexity of projectteam member selection through agent-based modeling,” International
gender in engineering," Social studies of science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[18] W. Faulkner, "Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities," Social studies of science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, 2007.[19] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd. ed ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.[20] "Essential Project Design Elements Checklist." https://cpb-us- w2.wpmucdn.com/wp.wpi.edu/dist/e/220/files/2017/06/Essential-Project-Design- Elements-Checklist.pdf (accessed July 2, 2020).[21] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, "Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote
engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[3] C. Garibay and R. M. Teasdale, “Equity and Evaluation in Informal STEM Education,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2019, no. 161, pp. 87–106, 2019.[4] B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, Engineering Practice in a Global Context. 2013.[5] R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere, “The ‘new environmental paradigm,’” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 1978.[6] A. Byars-Winston, “Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2014.[7] C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, p