. http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAcc ord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf (accessed Apr. 16, 2018).[4] C. E. Harris, M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[5] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[6] C. E. Harris, “The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153–164, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9068-3.[7] L. M. Steele et al., “How
incident(s) had occurred. Choices given for gender were male,female, and other, which the user was asked to describe. Options given for ethnic origin wereCaucasian, African American, Hispanic/Latino, Mixed Race, American Indian/Alaskan Native,Black African, Asian, and Indian/S. Asian. Given the relatively small number of responses fromethnicities other than Caucasian, we combined all other ethnicities into a single variable.Respondents were given an open-ended question regarding major or work category. In theanalysis, “STEM” was interpreted to include all majors/job categories in mathematics andengineering, and sciences such as physics, chemistry and biology, but not social sciences. Non-STEM was all other fields, ranging from social sciences to
better seethe “everyday ethics” in her workplace.Internships, along with other types of experiential learning including service learning, student-faculty research, study abroad, and capstone courses, have been identified as high-impactpractices for enriching student learning [13]. For instance, AAC&U’s College Learning for theNew Global Century notes that such experiences offer “rich opportunities for connectingknowledge with choices and action” [14, p. 36]. However, as Beatrice’s and Palano’s experiencedemonstrates, students may have “had the experience but missed the meaning” [15, p. 151,quoting T. S. Eliot’s Four Quartets]. Thus, there remains an open question about what could bedone to help students learn even more, especially closer to
York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.[3] I. Van de Poel and L. Royakkers, Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.[4] C. E. Harris, M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[5] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[6] M. A. Holsapple, T. S. Harding, D. D. Carpenter, J. A. Sutkus, and C. J. Finelli, “Framing Faculty and Student Discrepancies in Engineering Ethics Education Delivery,” J. Eng
such empirical evidence, faculty and administrators are often left with little more thananecdotal insights to guide the development of curricula and programs. To address this gap, inS. Claussen and S. Howland contributed equally to this paper and share joint first-authorship.2015 we initiated an NSF-sponsored, mixed-methods study that used multiple measures andtheoretical frameworks to explore how understandings of social and ethical responsibility changeamong undergraduate engineering students during a four-year engineering degree program, bothin general and in relation to specific learning environments and experiences.Our study design included interviews and surveys in Year 1, a repeat survey administration in thestudents’ fifth semester
engineeringeducation during COVID-19 pandemic.” ORMS Today Informs Membership Magazine, 2020.Available: https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/orms.2020.06.10/full/[3] Y. Lambrinidou & M. Edwards, “Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach toEngineering Ethics Education,” ASEE, 2013, Paper ID# 8224.[4] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, &Human Values, 39(1) , pp. 42-72, 2014.[5] M. F. Young, S. Slota, A. B. Cutter, G. Jalette, G. Mullin, B. Lai, & M. Yukhymenko, “Ourprincess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education”. Review ofEducational Research, 82(1), pp. 61-89, 2012.[6] D. G. Johnson, “Can engineering ethics be taught?” Yale University Press Blog, June 4
organizations students participated in by allowingthem to select to which organization(s) they belong. The survey had a response rate of 5.67%(total senior engineering students = 2907). The low response rate was expected because this wassent out to senior engineering students at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Table 1 and2 shows the summary statistics for PI score and participation in organizations. Figure 1 showstest for normality. For this test, H0: the sample follows a normal distribution and H1: the sampledoes not follow a normal distribution. As the computed p-value is greater than the significancelevel alpha=0.05, one cannot reject the null hypothesis H0. That is, the sample follows a normaldistribution. Incomplete responses were excluded
reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] World Health Organization, “Water, sanitation, hygiene and water management for the COVID-19 virus,” 2020.[2] C. Hendrickson and L. R. Rilett, “The COVID-19 Pandemic and Transportation Engineering,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 146, no. 7, pp. 1–2, 2020, doi: 10.1061/jtepbs.0000418.[3] R. K. Bhagat, M. S. Davies Wykes, S. B. Dalziel, and P. F. Linden, “Effects of ventilation on the indoor spread of COVID-19,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 903, 2020, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.720.[4] T. R. Witcher, “Collaboration among Professionals: The Role of Civil Engineers in Public Health,” Civil Engineering, vol. 90, no. 6, pp
1.16languageI participate in cultural events within my tribal community when 3.77 1.06 3.80 0.97possibleI know some of my tribe’s history 3.94 0.94 4.00 0.85I can identify important leaders for my tribe 3.76 1.07 3.67 1.09I can identify important social, health, political, or economic issues 3.78 1.07 3.76 1.07for my tribeI believe it is important to maintain and/or revitalize our Indigenous 3.80 1.14 3.78 1.15language(s
Accreditation of Bachelors Degree," American Council for Construction Education, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.acce- hq.org/forms-documents[6] NAAB, "Conditions for Accreditation 2020 Edition," National Architectural Accrediting Board, Inc., 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.naab.org/accreditation/[7] NSPE, "Ethics Resources," National Society of Professional Engineers, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/ethics-resources[8] Saap and J. H. Gill, American Insitute of Constructors: A Program on Construction Ethics 3rd Edition American Institute of Constructors, 2016.[9] J. Smith and S. Nichols, "Incident At Morales: An Engineering Ethics Story," Salt Lake City
, pp. 220–252, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20040.[5] G. Tejedor, M. Rosas-Casals, and J. Segalas, “Patterns and trends in engineering education in sustainability: A vision from relevant journals in the field,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 360–377, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2018-0131.[6] N. (National S. for P. Engineers), “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers.” https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics-engineers.[7] K. Q. Fisher, A. Sitomer, J. Bouwma-gearhart, and M. Koretsky, “Using social network analysis to develop relational expertise for an instructional change initiative,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, 2019.[8] C. Wieman, K. Perkins, and S. Gilbert
computing.Podcast project checkpoints and rubric: Since students were learning computing concepts inC for the remainder of the semester, weekly project checkpoints were included to help studentsmanage their time on the project as well as course homework assignments. Students hadapproximately six weeks to complete the assignment. The checkpoints were assigned as follows:Podcast Project CheckpointsWeek 1: Submit list of group membersWeek 2: Podcast Planning: 1. General Ethical Principle(s) Selected for Discussion 2. Podcast Format(s) Selected: Single vs. Group Conversation Scripted vs. Casual Interviews Read vs. “Live Interview”Week 3: Submit draft podcast storyboard or
Education?,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[5] 1615 L. St NW, Suite 800Washington, and D. 20036USA202-419-4300 | M.-857-8562 | F.- 419-4372 | M. Inquiries, “Diversity in the STEM workforce varies widely across jobs,” Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project, Jan. 09, 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/diversity-in-the-stem-workforce- varies-widely-across-jobs/ (accessed Apr. 19, 2021).[6] A. True-Funk, C. Poleacovschi, G. Jones-Johnson, S. Feinstein, K. Smith, and S. Luster- Teasley, “Intersectional Engineers: Diversity of Gender and Race Microaggressions and Their Effects in Engineering Education,” J. Manag. Eng
. Ethics. (24) pp. 551-583. 2018.[4] N. Bekir, V. Cable, I. Hashimoto, and S. Katz, “Teaching Engineering Ethics: A NewApproach,” in Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV,USA, October 10-13, 2001. Available:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=963938.[5] W.C. Carpenter, “Teaching Engineering Ethics with The Engineering Ethics Challenge Game,”in Proceedings of the 113th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, USA, June 12-15, 2005, pp. 10.1203.1-10.1203.13. Available: https://peer.asee.org/15157.[6] P. Lloyd and I. van de Poel, “Designing Games to Teach Ethics,” Science and EngineeringEthics, vol. 14, pp. 433-447, 2008.[7
. Contardi, R. Cingolani, I. S. Bayer, A. Heredia, and A. Athanassiou, “All‐natural sustainable packaging materials inspired by plant cuticles,” Adv. Sustain. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1-2, Jan. 5, 2017.[5] N. Norbisimi and S. Selke, “Social aspect of sustainable packaging,” Packag., Technol., and Sci., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 317-326, Oct. 2010.[6] W. T. Lynch and R. Kline, Engineering practice and engineering ethics, Sci., Technol., and Human Values, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 195-225, 2000.[7] P. F. Bone and R. J. Corey, “Packaging ethics: Perceptual differences among packaging professionals, brand managers and ethically-interested consumers,” J. of Bus. Ethics, vol. 24, pp. 199-213, 2000.[8] Advancing Sustainable Materials Management
’ awareness and knowledge of ethical issues andtheir understanding of the responsibility of engineers. Through the null and hidden curriculum,socialization can sometimes go unnoticed. However, this process is formative in learning andidentity formation. Situating ESI in socialization can illuminate the formal and informal elementsthat influence students’ enculturation into the profession and the ways in which undergraduateeducation can support ESI as a value and norm of engineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos.1540348, 1540341, 1540308, and 1755390. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not
: Preparing the Future Computing Workforce for Ethical Decision-Makingthrough Interactive Case Studies”. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of thefunding agencies. The research study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board atGeorge Mason University. 13ReferencesABET. (n.d.) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/EAC-Criteria-2020-2021.pdfAl-Aqeel, S. A. (2013). Pharmacy Students Feedback on the use of Role-play in Teaching Ethics.Pharmacy Education, 13.Birsch, D., & Fielder, J. H. 1994. The Ford Pinto case: A study in
Approaches for Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society, vol. 1, May 2014. [Online]. Available https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/node/3543.html.[2] P. R. Wolpe, “Neuroethics,” in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd ed., vol. 4, S. G. Post, Ed. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2003, pp. 1894–1898.[3] A. Roskies, “Neuroethics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 ed., E. N. Zalta, Ed. [Online]. Available https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/neuroethics/.[4] O. Müller and S. Rotter, “Neurotechnology: Current developments and ethical issues,” Front Syst Neurosci., vol 11, no. 93, December 13 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00093.[5] R. Yuste et al., “Four ethical priorities for
Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. Registered Professional Engineer (Ohio). Robinson’s ethics teaching style comes from an amalgam of academic, industrial (Bell Labs), governmen- tal (VA) and clinical experiences, plus an interest in ethics from his undergraduate days.Ms. Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University Since the late 1990’s Loretta’s passion has been to create engaging, diverse teaching and learning ex- periences for students and faculty. As the senior instructional designer at Clarkson University, she has presented at conferences such as the Online Learning Consortium and over the past two decades, she has also presented at a wide variety of other venues including ADEIL; Sloan-C
ethics education,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition. 2019.[3] D. Kim, “Promoting professional socialization: A synthesis of Durkheim, Kohlberg, Hoffman,and Haidt for professional ethics education,” Bus. Prof. Ethics J., to appear.[4] D. Kim, “Investigating individual engineers’ moral personality: Socialization and judgment,”in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2019.[5] D. P. McAdams & J. L. Pals, “A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative scienceof personality,” Am. Psychol., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 204-217, 2006.[6] K. S. Cameron & R. E. Quinn, Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on theCompeting Values Framework. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
impact your ethical knowledge, reasoning, or behavior?” Alumni rated sixengineering related activities, three non-engineering related, and could add other(s). Theresponse options provided were: did not participate, involved but no impact (0), small impact (1),moderate impact (2), large impact (3). Near the end of the survey, individuals were askedwhether they might be willing to participate in an interview about how their ethics instruction asa student impacted them after graduation. The survey concluded with demographic questions:year they had taken the targeted course, year they had earned their Bachelor’s degree, open-ended line to fill in the major of their Bachelor’s degree, whether or not they had earned graduatedegrees, types of
assignments at every step of the EDP.At the end of the semester, most teams have to-scale, functional prototypes.Table 1. Sample Design Projects Project Client Project Goal Duke Lemur Center Develop an enrichment device for the aye-aye lemurs that delivers a small amount of food Dr. S. Rent Develop a device that simultaneously measures the temperature of five newborns placed in one crib (for use in Ethiopia) X-Prize Team Design a drone that can attach to a tree branch to deliver a camera Museum of Life & Design a device that randomly delivers food to skunks in their enclosure Science Bridge2Sports Develop an easy method for wheelchair users to
the results should not be overly generalized due to thesmall number of teachers interviewed, the results indicate that many entering college studentsmay already be somewhat familiar with the importance of EESI in engineering. In addition, thefindings dovetail with recent attention on the preparation of K-12 teachers to educate students onengineering [21], indicating that teachers should be aware of the important role of ethics inengineering.AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1540348. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] National
-assessment in moralreasoning, at the beginning of the semester all students were asked to complete a surveycomprised of four of the six cases from the Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT,described below). Prior to the interactive case study, several lectures and activities introducedfirst-year students to ethical decision making in engineering. In the discussion sections thatimplemented the interactive case study, one class was devoted to students creating their owncode of ethics, then matching their codes to the NSPE Code and generating a list of additionalcodes that are not in the NSPE Code. Next, a lecture introduced all first-year students to theNSPE Code of Ethics and had students play a virtual game in which they chose a building(s