Displaying all 7 results
- Conference Session
- Enhancing Teaching and Research
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Balsam Albayati
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
practice/experience with the mentor as a guide since the manuscripts are so diverse. Don't feel had enough experience with varied methodologies, writing style, examining fidelity between research questions and methods or data presented.This indicates a need for the program to be more flexible in terms of the number of manuscriptseach triad completes. In future rounds of the program, we plan to emphasize to participants thatthey can continue in their mentoring relationship beyond three manuscripts. The triad structure, where two mentees work with one mentor, was a noted benefit fromprogram participants. For example, one participant shared: The single best aspect of doing the programme has been working in a team of three. It
- Conference Session
- Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
criteria be used to effect similar change? (2) How can faculty responses to Swivl-based lecture capture be optimized? (3) What best practices emerge from a QM-based dashboard tool coupled with Swivl-capture technology?Prior to the pandemic, a need for QM-based capture tool was already forming. As The Citadelwas moving some courses and graduate programs online, even before the pandemic, programdirectors and institutional audits noted a disparity in online course delivery. A large number ofstudents taking certain online classes during the summer were failing or withdrawing. In many ofthese courses, the instructor had very little online presence, was communicating solely by emailwith the students and vice-versa, and providing no or very
- Conference Session
- Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
thinking, problem-solving and algorithmic thinking. Dr. Mendoza-Garcia’s research interests include investigating how to nurture in students these skills. He also worked in Industry before transitioning to academia. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Redesigning a large enrollment online course using a learner-centered approach.This paper is a follow-up to my experience redesigning my online course in problem-solving CGS2531Problem-Solving Using Computer Software [1]. In that paper, the instructional developer and I describedthe design decisions to improve students' engagement. In this second paper, I am reporting what hashappened after its implementation.My
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Valeriya Yudina, Higher School of Economics; Yulia Skrupskaya, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Victor Taratukhin, SAP Silicon Valley and University of Muenster; Elvira Kozlova; Natalia Pulyavina, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Paper ID #34494Bringing Together Engineering and Management Students for aProject-Based Global Idea-thon: Towards Next-Gen Design ThinkingMethodologyValeriya Yudina, Higher School of EconomicsYulia Skrupskaya, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsProf. Victor Taratukhin, SAP Silicon Valley and University of Muenster Victor Taratukhin received his Ph.D. in Engineering Design in 1998 and Ph.D. in Computing Sciences and Engineering in 2002. Victor was a Lecturer in Decision Engineering and Module Leader (IT for Product Realization) at Cranfield University, UK (2001-2004), SAP University Alliances Program Director
- Conference Session
- Enhancing Teaching and Research
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Kweku Brown P.E., The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel; Nandan Hara Shetty, The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
, she recently, in December 2020, graduated with a Master of Science in Project Management from The Citadel.Dr. Nandan Hara Shetty, The Citadel Dr. Nandan Hara Shetty is an assistant professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at The Citadel, located in Charleston, South Carolina. He received his BE from Dartmouth College and his MS/PhD from Columbia University, researching the performance of rain gardens and roof gardens. He also worked for 11 years as an environmental engineer on construction and research of green infrastructure for the New York City Parks Department. Nandan is highly interested in engaging students, while pursuing dialogue with cities on urban climate and water research.Dr. William J. Davis
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
which perspective they are viewingresearch from: a technical one, when solutions are considered as the best way of doing somethingand/or a cultural one, when solutions are evaluated within a specific context. Bringing theseideas alongside the ideas of design-based research presented above, we can interpret phrasessuch as the “best way of doing something” and evaluating solutions “within a specific context”as pointing to the need to interrogate outcomes. In other words, what does it mean for somethingto work. In the following section, we provide details on the specific context in which theInclusivity Meter is used.ContextThe narrative of the Inclusivity Meter is specific to one classroom practice but is embedded in alarger department wide effort
- Conference Session
- Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology ; Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
efficient in learning. All together with using active learning, instructors mustalso consider the ‘Student Resistance to Active Learning’ which remains a new area of interest forengineering education research [12]. ‘Student Resistance to Active Learning’ may be reduced byemploying the strategies proposed in literature such as varying the teaching methods usedthroughout the course and making and using a public grading rubric for students to avoidperception of grading unfairness, just to mention few [13-14]. Although, this paper focused on thedifferences in student expectations on the efficacy of instructional practices, the impact of thosechanges on the learning outcomes is yet to be determined and is the focus of our future work.References[1