instructionalbenefit of tracking student learning.Bibliography[1] “Biomedical Engineering: What is it and what are the career opportunities?” Mendeley Careers. [Online]. Available: https://www.mendeley.com/careers/news/careers-jobs-field/biomedical-engineering-what-it-and- what-are-career-opportunities. [Accessed: 25-Feb-2021][2] C. Nerantzi, “A Case of Problem Based Learning for Cross-Institutional Collaboration,” Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 306–314, 2012.[3] A. Ingram, “Engagement in Online Learning Communities,” in Elements of quality online education: engaging communities, vol. 6, J. Bourne and J. C. Moore, Eds. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2005, p. 205 [Online]. Available: https
program and plans to pursue further educational and career opportunities involving human-centered design, product development, and global health.Frank J. Marsik, University of Michigan Frank Marsik is the Faculty Director of First Year Student Engagement in Undergraduate Education within the University of Michigan, College of Engineering. He received his PhD from the University of Michi- gan. In addition to serving as the primary instructor for ”Engineering 110: Design Your Engineering American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #34818Experience”, he also teaches a
Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She managed undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to science and engineering career opportunities. Ms. Marlor joined University of California, Berkeley in 2013. She has a B.S. in Materials Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American
learning while still ensuring students are provided with the requiredtechnical material can be an issue due to time constraints. Most engineering courses need the fullin-class time throughout the semester to ensure students are taught the technical content that isrequired for future courses or a future career. To allow for both active learning and teaching therequired technical material, a fundamental change in how the course is taught is needed. Byhaving students learn the lecture material outside of class, the time spent in class can be used tobetter engage students in active learning. In this approach, often called a flipped classroom,students partake in assigned materials before class by either watching prerecorded lecture videos,reading
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Dr. Gambatese’s expertise is in the broad areas of construction engineering and management, and structural engineering. He has taught many courses over his career on a variety of subjects including: construction safety, contracts and specifications, planning and scheduling, structural analysis and design, temporary construction structures, construction site systems engineering, and engineering economics. He has performed research and published numer- ous articles on construction worker safety, work zone design and safety, prevention through design, risk management, sustainability, constructability, innovation, and construction contracting. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in
biomicrofluidics. More recently, her interests have emphasized mentorship of women and underrepresented students in order to promote persistence and success in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Book Club Model to Promote Personal and Professional Development Activities for Female Engineering and Computer Science StudentsIntroduction and MotivationProfessional and leadership development is one recommended strategy to support and retainfemale engineers and computer scientists in their professional careers in industry or academia[1], [2], [3], [4]. For women in engineering and computer science, personal
inception in 2000. Her current responsibilities include academic program and curriculum development and assessment of and workshop/course instruction in the areas of teaming, human-centered design and leadership. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technologi- cal University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Ms. Laura Vidal-Chiesa, Michigan Technological UniversityModupe Omolara Yusuf, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. Abraham Romney, Michigan Technological University Abraham Romney is Associate Professor
STEM as a career path[2]. Not only does this underrepresentation of low-SES graduates impact the overall numbers ofSTEM professionals in the U.S., but it also means that those graduates are missing out on all ofthe financial and professional benefits that a job in STEM offers.To address the representation gap in STEM for low-income students, the National ScienceFoundation created the Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) grant program. NSF seeks to supportevidence-based initiatives that will support low-income STEM students financially and in othernon-financial ways. The Endeavour Program was developed as one of those initiatives, and itprovides scholarships for 80 students over their first two years in a STEM major. Knowing thatthe link between
-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educa- tional and global change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Graduate Student Perceptions of an Ideal Mentor in Engineering and Computing at a Minority Serving Institution: Preliminary ResultsAbstractReports from the National Academies and Council of Graduate Schools suggest that
provision of career and psychosocial support. [8, p. 2]Many studies have focused on the benefits to mentees, both at the K-12 youth and undergraduatelevels [5], [6], [13], [14]. Previous research of effective faculty mentorship in undergraduateresearch found that undergraduate mentees self-reported gains in research, skills, productivity,and retention in STEMM [8]. Estrada et al. [15] found that when combined with qualitymentorship, research experiences positively impacted URM students’ science efficacy, identity,and values. Beyond undergraduate research settings, effective mentorship has been shown toimpact the science identity and deep interest in science of female undergraduate students, andthese gains were higher for students mentored by
Definition Example Condition Preparedness for academic competency arising from a Funding •• Readiness combination of personal maturity Specified Career Goals • and favorable environmental Familiarity with Advisor conditions. An external stimulus for which an Coursework •• individual lacks the skills, Qualifying
and studied for over a decade. Continuing HIP research, however, isstill needed across varying activities and institutional contexts because HIP take different formsand are employed based on learner characteristics as well as institutional priorities [6]. Kuh [6]identified eleven high impact educational practices (HIP) as shown in Figure 1. Six of thesepractices (i.e., global learning and study abroad, internships, learning communities, seniorculminating experiences, service and community-based learning, and undergraduate research)have been reported by students to provide personal and practical, career-related gains in additionto support for deep learning of academic content [7]. Based on their demonstrated ability tosupport student personal
supporting adults through learning and career transitions. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021The Future of Work: Identifying Future-Ready Capabilities for the Industrial Distribution WorkforceAbstract: Emerging technological developments such as autonomous robots, the IndustrialInternet of Things (IoT), and cobots raise major challenges in labor markets and forpolicymakers responsible for promoting the necessary skills and employment. It is imperative tobetter understand and track these trends in the labor market and the future of work (FOW) so thatstrategies to inform, prepare for, and respond to changes in the industrial
STEM to make it the new norm. She has also architected SFAz’s enhanced Community College STEM Pathways Guide that has received the national STEMx seal of approval for STEM tools. She integrated the STEM Pathways Guide with the KickStarter processes for improving competitive proposal writing of Community College Hispanic Serving Institutions. Throughout her career, Ms. Pickering has written robotics software, diagnostic expert systems for space station, manufacturing equipment models, and architected complex IT systems for global collaboration that included engagement analytics. She holds a US Patent # 7904323, Multi-Team Immersive Integrated Collaboration Workspace awarded 3/8/2011. She also has twenty-five peer
items quantifying 16 latent non-cognitive constructs: 1). Academic motivation (AMO), 2).persistence (PST), 3). mastery learning goal orientation (MLG), 4). personal achievement goalorientation (PAG), 5). deep learning approach (DLA), 6). surface learning approach (SLA), 7).problem-solving approach (PSA), 8). implicit beliefs about intelligence and person as a whole(IMB), 9). self-worth in competition (SWC), 10). self-worth in other’s approach (SWO), 11).social engagement (SCE), 12). teamwork (TWK), 13). decision making in college major (DMC),14). fit with major/career (FIT), 15). occupational confidence (OCC), and 16). curiosity andexploration (CEI). The second column in Table 1 shows the number of items in each construct,ranging from 3 in SWO
, the experience becomes an extended interview, from the companyperspective, where they are able to gain more insight into a potential hire than can be gleaned froma resume or typical short on-campus interview. The approach also has the benefit of still allowingthe partner company to potentially directly contact a student of interest for a formal interview thatcan lead to a full-time internship, co-op experience, or a full-time position upon degree completion.The target audience for this course is primarily students in their sophomore year of engineeringand beyond due to the baseline technical experience that the students have achieved at that pointin their academic career having experienced at least one year of college and completing at
Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main received a National Science Foundation CAREER award to examine the longitudinal career pathways of engineering PhDs. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Institutional Supports for Student Experiential Learning in Hybrid/Remote Learning ContextsAbstractStudents’ experiential learning in out-of-class involvements encompasses a significant part oftheir engagement and professional development in college. The covid-19 pandemic haschallenged the delivery of these experiential
. Edwing A. Medina, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Venezuelan-American, career-changer STEM Education researcher, Institutional Research, Assessment, and Accreditation. I am passionate about STEM teaching and learning, STEM modeling and multiple representations, and STEM discourse by/for English Language learners, historically under-represented groups. I create, analyze, and help make data visualizations actionable, so that they address under- representation by key constituencies in STEM Education, academic equity, and social justice issues. I bring a 10-year experience from multi-national corporate media entertainment, 10 years working with K-12 students and families interested (or developing their
informal learning environments. His recent projects include de- veloping and evaluating STEM-related programs, curriculums, and activities for children and their fami- lies, and conducting research on museum educators and their professional development.Ms. Yessenia Argudo, New York Hall of Science Yessenia holds a master of public health in community health education from CUNY School of Public Health and Public Policy. She has worked in various areas within public health including respectful maternal care, sexual and reproductive health, nutrition and global health. Her belief that ”knowledge is power” has fueled her career choices and led her to join NYSCI as a research and development assistant. She will be
, Teacher A developed curriculum materialsfocused on career pathways related to the field of neurotechnologies. For one of his lesson plans,Teacher A developed career biographies of CNT faculty, students, and staff across differentdisciplines represented in neurotechnology. Two of these biographies featured neuroethicsfaculty members and one featured a postdoctoral researcher from the neuroethics research group.The strategies described in this section demonstrate how teachers participating in the RETprogram had access to multiple professional learning opportunities centered on neuroethics. Inaddition, teachers designed curriculum materials that embedded neuroethics topics andpedagogical strategies for ethics education in the science classroom
many are enrolled in the school’s Humanitarian Engineering undergraduateminors. In contrast, Petroleum Engineering Seminar is a required course for petroleumengineering students that teaches CSR themes as part of its broader focus on professionaldevelopment. Both courses are almost exclusively taken by graduating seniors. For the purposesof this paper, we analyze one semester of data. In Fall 2017 the Seminar course was taught by aprofessor who held both a PhD in petroleum engineering and a JD and was appointed to thePetroleum Engineering Department. The course was grounded in project-based learning instudent groups, with a focus on practical application to student careers. The second author helpeddevelop the course activities and assignments
Paper ID #32523Elementary Students Learn How To Engineer Online (RTP)Dr. Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner’s career in P-12 STEM education focuses on increasing interest in and participation by females and URMs and on teacher professional development. She is an Adjunct Professor of Biomedi- cal Engineering at Vanderbilt University where she serves as the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For US All (e4usa) project. Dr. Klein-Gardner formerly served as the chair of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Board of Directors’ P12 Commission and the Pre-College
, especiallyin the area of career and technical education (CTE) or other science, technology, engineering,and mathematics courses such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) that normally have hands-on orlaboratory learning were not simple to convert to a virtual environment [3]. During the initialmove to remote instruction, these courses were challenged with providing access to high-endequipment or computing resources requiring high-speed internet, and they no longer couldbenefit from in-person, close-up demonstrations of proper technique or the opportunity forteachers to ascertain students’ proficiency of the material in real time [4]. There were concernsthat some students might not be receiving quality instruction in these courses, which wouldnegatively
thetransfer to a new university easy. Strategies employed by the LINK scholarship program focuson integration of new transfer students into the College of Engineering culture and onprofessional planning and skill development. We recognize that extracurricular involvement andleadership experience while an engineering student are important aspects in professionaldevelopment, but that a two-year timeline makes them difficult to achieve without intentionality.Efforts to integrate new transfers include a zero-credit (no cost) seminar that serves to familiarizestudents with the college and university environment and resources. Resumes are written,evaluated, and edited, and visits from the career services offices make sure that students areaware of support
explore what engineering really means, both to society andthemselves, as well as how they can find success in engineering practice. Students do thisthrough several communication techniques, interactions with professionals, and development oflearning strategies in order to provide exemplars for the required SOs.The initial iteration (fall 2017) of the “What is Engineering?” module, led by Dr. Olga Pierrakos,focused more closely on helping students develop and explore academic and professional goalsand dreams in the context of understanding the engineering profession broadly andunderstanding foundational knowledge that defines engineering practice. Students completed apersonal statement of professional interests and career goals via a worksheet
study relied on qualitative interviews, using artifact elicitation interviews and constructivist critical incident technique interviews, of adult Makers. Through inductive analysis of a collection of interviews with Makers, a theme emerged where Makers from different educational backgrounds and with different careers (e.g., art, STEM, business) were making artifacts that had similar purposes. We present two cases of parallel pathways, (1) musical artifacts and (2) large-scale interactive artifacts, to demonstrate the multiple, parallel life pathways that Makers take to making their artifacts and the contextual events and activities that are critical to the direction of these pathways. The stories
Borrego is Director of the Center for Engineering Education and Professor of Mechanical Engi- neering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She previously served as Deputy Edi- tor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of in- terdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards
study is informed by the need to address the well-documentedunderrepresentation of low-socioeconomic status (SES) and minoritized students in engineeringand other related careers [1]–[3]. Researchers advanced that, in addition to intellectual andscientific reasons, low-income students are attracted to the major by the potential prospect ofemployment after completing a degree [1], [4]. Financial considerations are critical for low-SESengineering students; this includes considerations of financial aid and differential tuition [5].Programs such as the National Science Foundation Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) have beenimplemented to address financial assistance of low-SES students. This study is part of alongitudinal five-year S-STEM project
graduate students and post-doctoral faculty), but the majority wereAssistant or Associate Professors (i.e., early careers rather than later careers).While the symposium was designed to allow faculty members to share specific teachingtools and techniques, we wanted to understand more about culture change. To explore this,we created a post-symposium survey to prompt participants to think deeply about thequestion of culture change. There were two open-ended questions (n = 21 responses): 1. Research I (R1) university is a category that the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education uses to indicate universities in the United States that engage in the highest levels of research activity. There is currently no
have accurate understandings ofSTEM domains [8]. This is associated with reluctance in explaining STEM concepts andmisconceptions by the students [9]. However, caregivers’ values and their acknowledgement ofthe importance of STEM education were related to children’s interests and career aspirationdevelopment in STEM fields. Youth with understanding of their caregivers’ educational valuetowards science were more likely to have a career goal related to science [10].While there is literature describing caregivers’ involvement and their values towards STEMeducation, we know less about conflicts between caregivers and children in STEM learningactivities. Anderson, Piscitelli, and Everett [11] summarized three types of conflicts in agendasbetween