Expositions, June, 2014, Indianapolis, IN.[7] M. V. Huerta, J. S. London, A. Trowbridge, M. A. Avalos, W. Huang, and A. F. McKenna, “Cultivating the entrepreneurial mindset through design: Insights of thematic analysis of first-year engineering students’ reflections,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2017, Columbus, OH.[8] M. J. Jensen and J. L. Schlegel, “Implementing an entrepreneurial mindset design project in an introductory engineering course,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2017, Columbus, OH.[9] A. Ferrar and D. Roberts, “Sustainable senior design: MVP engine,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2019, Tampa, FL.[10] A. Ali, D. M
programdrawing content from mechanical and computer engineering disciplines. In 2019 and 2020, 254and 220 students respectively, were divided approximately evenly between 2 “streams” (thosethat have a first work term after 4 months, and those having a first work term after 8 months).Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, all instruction for fall 2020 was done remotely with the majorityof students living at home (approximately 1/3 of students lived on campus in fall 2020).This paper focusses on two courses taught during the 1A term to mechatronics students that havelarge design components. MTE100 carries the academic weight of 1.5 courses in the term andhas 9 contact hours per week (3 hours of lecture, a 3 hour engineering graphics lab, and a 3 hourstudio session
and study abroad,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017.[3] S. A. McComb, L. Fedele, P. A. Brunese, and V. L. Simpson, “An Interprofessional, Intercultural, Immersive Short-Term Study Abroad Program: Public Health and Service Systems in Rome,” Front. Interdiscip. J. Study Abroad, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 148–168, 2019, doi: 10.36366/frontiers.v31i1.447.[4] J. Thompson, B. Jesiek, and D. Atkinson, “Assessing the intercultural competence of sophomore mechanical engineering students: Baseline data and analysis,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2010.[5] A. Dare, “Assessment of Global Engineering Competencies,” Purdue University, 2011.[6] M. G. Interis, J. Rezek, K. Bloom, and A
Year. Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, June. Paper ID# 21282[6] Shepard, T. (2013), Implementing First Year Design Projects with the Power of Choice. Paperpresented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June. Paper ID# 19722[7] Shepard, T., & Choi, J., & Holmes, T. D., & Carlin, B. W. (2015), The Effect of ProjectConstraints on First Year Microcontroller Projects. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. June. 10.18260/p.24860[8] Dunnigan, K. A., Bringardner J., and G. W. Georgi (2019) “From Pre-Defined to Open-Ended Projects:Evaluating First-Year Ability to Innovate and Problem Solve.” American Society of EngineeringEducation’s Annual Conference
revising film series. Using results of customer interviews, surveys ofstudents who have viewed films, and film analytics, we have created four prototypes of the film series since Summerof 2019. After creating a minimum viable prototype of the film series, we tested the series invarious technical courses during the Fall 2019 semester. In these tests, students viewed the filmseries before a class period, responded to oral questions about the content of the film seriesduring the class, and then completed a short survey about the film series at the end of class. Thesurvey focused on biggest surprises of the film series and suggestions for making the film seriesmore effective. As a third means of developing our film series, we tracked the
.[6] Meyers, K. and Goodrich, V. (2019) Engineering Major Certainty: A Look at MajorDiscernment Initiatives Pre and Post. American Society for Engineering Education NationalConference, Tampa, FL.[7] Reid, K., Reaping, D., and Spingola, E. (2018) A taxonomy for introduction to engineeringcourses. The International journal of engineering education, ISSN-e 0949-149X, Vol. 34, no. 1,2018, pg. 2-19.[8] M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, et al., “Hybrid Engineering Matriculation Model to PromoteInformed Engineering- Major Selection Decisions,” 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington., 2015, pp. 26.867.1 - 26.867.14[9] C. Brozina and K. Meyers, Engineering Major Discernment: A Model for Informing Studentsand Offering Choice Paper
. Abiade, “Board 35: An Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of Academically Talented Low-income Engineering Students,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[6] R. Nazempour, H. Darabi, P. Nelson, , R. Revelo, Y. Siow, J. Abiade, “Execution Details and Assessment Results of a Summer Bridge Program for Engineering Freshmen,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[7] R. Nazempour, H. Darabi, R. Revelo, P. Nelson, A. Felder, D. Ozevin, J. Abiade., “Implementation of an introductory engineering course and its impact on students’ academic success and retention,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, 2020.[8] H. Darabi, R. Nazempour, S
area.References:Bowden, J. A. (2005). Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne RMIT University Press.Coats, D. (Sept. 2019). Venture Capital – No We’re Not Normal. Retrieved from https://medium.com/correlation-ventures/venture-capital-no-were-not-normal- 32a26edea7c7Coelho, P. R. P., & McClure, J. E. (2005). Learning from failure. Mid-American Journal of Business, 20: 13-20.Davis, K. C. & Beyette, F. R. (2017). Developing and assessing elevator pitches in capstone design. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH.Duval-couetil, N. & Reed-rhoads, T. (2012). Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education : Involvement , Attitudes and Outcomes. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 28
and Performance in First-Year Engineering CoursesIntroductionThis full evidence-based paper discusses an elaborate analysis conducted to compare studentparticipation and performance in two courses amidst all the changes and adjustments that tookplace due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We look at the impact of sudden interruption and transitionto remote learning in Spring 2020 and at Fall 2020, which was offered in converged (students canchoose to attend class face-to-face or synchronous remotely) and synchronous online mode.Student data from Fall 2019, where the courses were offered in the usual face-to-face setting, iscompared to the two abovementioned semesters. This section provides a brief overview on the twocourses that were analyzed and
- academia collaborations in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 2016. 79: p. 106-127.[8]. Weagle, D., D.B. Ortendahl, and A. Ahern P.E., Universities and Industries: A Proactive Partnership Shaping the Future of Work, in 126th ASEE National Conference. 2019: Tampa, FL.[9] Harrisberger, L., Experiential Learning in Engineering Education. 1976.[10] Banks, S., et al., Focus on EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS for STEM Workers - Points To Experiential Learning, S.I.T. Force, Editor. 2015, STEMconnector: Washington, D.C.[11] Moon, J.A., A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. 2004: Psychology Press.[12]. Hauhart, R.C. and J.E
content mastery in EET2141between two groups of students. The first group of students attended EET2141 in Fall 2019 andthey were administered real-world problems to solve in the form of printed worksheets handedout after each class lecture. The printed worksheets were related to that day’s lecture materialand were collected in class. The second group of students attended EET2141 during Fall 2020semester and after each class session they were assigned the same worksheets but only availableonline (on Canvas Learning Management System). Students submitted their completedworksheets online via the LMS. The recitation sessions for both groups were held face to face inorder to evaluate the absolute impact of physical and online worksheets between the
, 2020, vol. 2020-June.[2] K. M. DeGoede, “Competency based assessment in dynamics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[3] C. B. Aviles, “A Qualitative Study of Social Work Instructor and Student Reactions to Mastery Learning Instruction.,” ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED449412, Jan. 2001.[4] M. Henri, M. D. Johnson, and B. Nepal, “A Review of Competency-Based Learning: Tools, Assessments, and Recommendations,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 607–638, Oct. 2017.[5] D. of US Education, “Competency-Based Learning or Personalized Learning.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ed.gov/oii-news/competency-based-learning-or-personalized- learning
, 2017.[9] Rios, O. and Fadda, D., “Using Computer Simulations in a Freshman Mechanical Engineering Course toMake Informed Design Decisions,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[10] Rios, O. and Fadda, D., “A Conceptual Design Activity for a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course,”ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[11] Wickert, J. and Lewis, K., An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering, Fourth Edition, CengageLearning, Boston, MA, 2017.[12] Fadda, D., Rios, O. and Vinay, R., “Teaching Modalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference, Baylor University, 2021.Appendix AThe tables below show the results to the survey question. Responses were recorded on a 5
(if they chose to) during alternatingweeks.Student teams were formed using the CATME [16] software like previous semesters. The onlymodification was that if students notified the instructor in advance that they would join the classvirtually exclusively, they would be teamed up with other entirely virtual students if possible.Teaching materials and assessment in Fall 2020 were largely kept the same as in Fall 2019.Quizzes and exams had to be done online instead of in-person. Project presentations and demoswere switched to Zoom. Rather than students working with their teammates side by side in atraditional lab setting, they were assigned to their team’s Zoom breakout room for discussion andgroupwork. Instructor and teaching assistants
2012 and 2019 [5].This paper will describe the philosophical and practical questions which arose in adoptingDELTA’s gamification module for use in Engineering Statics at NC State. Each of the questionsbelow could be answered in very different ways in different situations with different instructors;Every solution has pros and cons. This paper states the philosophical questions we agonized overand describes the solutions the team adopted for this version of Statics. Any similar project mayhave different answers to these questions but will likely encounter the need to answer them oneway or the other. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Annual
. Buckley, T. N. Barnes, J. Enszer, S. Rooney, and R. Davidson, “Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Cross-Sectional Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Engineering Programs,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:’ Achieving individual diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[6] M. Paretti, R. Layton, S. Laguette, and G. Speegle, “Managing and mentoring capstone design teams: Considerations and practices for faculty,” Int. J. Eng. Educ
theapplication materials to seek out that information, as well as descriptors for each criterion’snumerical rating. A score is given for each criterion and then all criteria scores are totaled andused as part of the overall admissions evaluation.Faculty dialogues, meetings, and educational emails were used to increase implementation of therubric across the school beginning with the admissions cycle for students matriculating in the Fallof 2019. The rubric was updated for the admissions cycle for students matriculating in the Fall of2020 based on continued feedback of faculty users, and review by premier experts in the field ofholistic graduate admissions. In the admissions cycle for students matriculating in the Fall of 2020,57% of admitted PhD students
engineering undergraduate students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 215-221, 2005.[14] J.W. Lounsbury, J.J. Levy, S.-H. Park, L.W. Gibson and R. Smith, "An investigation of the construct validity of the personality trait of self-directed learning," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 19, pp. 411-418, 2009.[15] Cavalli, M.N., A. Grice, “Work in Progress: Openness, Conscientiousness, Self- Direction, and Mindset in First-Year Engineering Students”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Online, 2020.[16] “International Personality Item Pool.” Accessed on: August 15, 2019. [online]. Available: https://ipip.ori.org/.[17] K. De Castella and D. Byrne, “My intelligence may be more
BE in 1992 and ME in 1998 from the University of Madras, and PhD in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University in 2009. He is an IEEE senior Member and ASEE Member.Dr. Johnathan Barnett, Huntingdon College Dr. Johnathan Barnett is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Huntingdon College. He received his BS from Huntingdon College in 2011. He received both his MS and PhD in Mathematics from Auburn University in 2013 and 2016, respectively.Dr. Derrick Dean, Alabama State UniversityDr. Raynetta Prevo-Williams, Alabama State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Active Learning in Online Education for Engineering
hands-on design project implemented by instructorsin three such courses, as supported by the NSF grant, in fall 2019 and fall 2020 offerings. Thethree courses were separate sections for chemical and natural gas engineering, mechanicalengineering, and electrical engineering and computer science. The GEEN 1201 courses havebeen offered in the Frank H. Dotterweich College of Engineering since fall of 2018. Prior tothat, all incoming freshmen were required to take a university-wide student success course inplace of the GEEN 1201 course. These design project experiences were included only in the2019 and 2020 offerings of the chemical engineering and mechanical engineering sections, whiledesign projects were included in all three years of the
range of audiences.References[1] A. C. Szatmary, "Evidence for design of mechanical engineering curriculum," in 126thASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Charged Up for the Next 125 Years, ASEE 2019,June 15, 2019 - June 19, 2019, Tampa, FL, United states, 2019: American Society forEngineering Education, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[2] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019”, ABET.org (accessed March 7,2021).[3] Lappalainen, P., “Communication as part of the engineering skills set.” European Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp.123-129, 2009.[4] M. Menekse and M. T. Chi, "The role of collaborative interactions versus individualconstruction on students’ learning of
%, the four-year graduation rate was 46%, and the six-year graduation rate was 59%. These quantitative data indicatethat both FTIC and transfer students at CEC share similar attributes; they are part-time students, need morefinancial support, are older than traditional students, and many do not earn their degrees within four or evensix years.All of the CEC graduation rates are considerably lower than reflected in some national data sets (see Table1). For instance, the national four-year graduation rate for engineering undergraduates is 32% (AmericanSociety for Engineering Education or ASEE, 2019), compared to just 14% at Florida InternationalUniversity. The six-year graduation rate for CEC and all engineering undergraduates in the US is
/politics/2019/05/28/gop-lawmakers-extending- university-wisconsin-tuition-freeze/1227519001/ (accessed December 2020).[8] University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents. https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/meetingmaterials/ (accessed December 2020). Note: the annual data for the previous year typically appears in the December meeting material for the Business and Finance Committee.[9] ASEE online profiles of Colleges. https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/college-profiles#Online_Profiles (accessed December 2020).[10] University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Enrollment. https://uwmadison.app.box.com/s/d7901sp12wp0zxclyc9hpm2wrspfxf99/file/639595697 808 (accessed December 2020).[11
Training for Industrial Engineers,” in 2020 Industrial and Systems Engineering Conference, ISEC 2020, 2020.[14] J. Kaspar and M. Vielhaber, “Cooperative and application-oriented learning in engineering design – Systems design methodology educated on solutions for mousetrap-powered vehicles,” Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Eng. Prod. Des. Educ. Towar. a New Innov. Landscape, E PDE 2019, no. September, 2019.[15] S. A. Sohoni, S. S. Jordan, J. Kittur, and N. L. Pereira, “Work in progress: Integrating differentiated instruction and project-based learning to teach embedded systems,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., no. June, 2019.[16] R. Crespo, E. Lopez-Caudana, and P. Ponce, “An Immersive Week for
PhD from U.C. Berkeley.Dr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other teaching excellence initiatives. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and engineering mathematics. Among other teaching awards, she received the 2020 ASEE St
McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other teaching excellence initiatives. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and engineering mathematics. Among other teaching awards, she received the 2020 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Prof. Brian J. Kirby, Cornell UniversityProf. Elizabeth Mills Fisher, Cornell University Elizabeth M. Fisher is an Associate Professor
overall and forunder-represented groups). STEER members facilitate STEM Teaching Workshops sponsoredby the university provost. Each year, STEM Scholar Awards are made to several faculty whohave successfully applied EBT to their courses.We described many of these thrusts at the 2019 ASEE conference. In this paper, we will focusmore on describing the thrusts that have been implemented, or have evolved, since then. Also, asthis grant is in its no-cost extension year, we will present results and lessons learned.Specifically, we will address the number of faculty, graduate assistants and undergraduatestudents directly impacted by each thrust and will quantify, to the extent possible, the effect ofthat impact. Institutional data related to retention
explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular
. Ross et al., "Scaling and assessment of an evidence-based faculty development program for promoting active learning pedagogical strategies," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019, doi: https://peer.asee.org/32240. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32240[9] A. McKenna, A. M. Johnson, B. Yoder, R. C. Chavela Guerra, and R. Pimmel, "Evaluating virtual communities of practice for faculty development," The Journal of Faculty Development, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31-40, 2016.[10] S. S. Courter, C. Freitag, and M. McEniry, "Professional development online: Ways of knowing and ways of practice," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, DC, 2004, doi: https
Publications, https://peer.asee.org/28335. [Accessed February 27th, 2021].[14] W. J. Schell IV P.E., B. E. Hughes, B. Tallman P.E., E. Annand, R. M. Beigel, and M. B Kwapisz. "Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Engineering Identity and Leadership Self-Efficacy". 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, June 2019. [Online]. Available: ASEE Conferences, https://peer.asee.org/32817. [Accessed February 22nd 2021][15] L. Fogg-Rogers and T. Moss, “Validating a scale to measure engineers’ perceived self-efficacy for engineering education outreach,” Plos One, vol. 14, no.10, p. 1–13, October 2019. [Online]. Available: Plos One Research Article, https://doi-org.ccc.idm.oclc.org