previousiterations of the ELC, as well as higher levels of academic resilience than other first-yearstudents who began in Fall 2019 but did not participate in the ELC. This all provides evidencethat the ELC, its high-impact practices, its iterations, and the availability of an S-STEMscholarship for financially qualified students are indeed promoting student success inundergraduate engineering.Limitations of this study include a small sample size, a timeframe too short to consider long-termretention and graduation outcomes, and the somewhat narrow understanding of complex in-vivosocial science phenomena that occurs when only quantitative data are considered. Suggestionsfor future research include gathering longitudinal data that includes retention and
more useableand useful to instructors. Of equal importance, though, was that through the process ofgenerating the list, it became clear to us that some of the ITM’s best practices were written insuch a way that the three of us working on the document did not even agree on what they meant.This discovery helped us make a final set of revisions to the wording of the ITM’s best practicesthat both better aligned with the Model-Antithesis-Exemplar table and better reflected ouroriginal intentions for an ITM. The ITM we designed as a result of the process described here ispresented in Figure 3. Figure 3. The Institutional Teaching Model as presented to participants of the 2020 Teaching Workshop and promoted to faculty.In the summer of 2019, as
development," ed: New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.[17] C. T. Fosnot, Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press, 2013.[18] B. J. Wadsworth, Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishing, 1996.[19] T. M. Duffy and D. J. Cunningham, "7. Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction," 1996.[20] A. E. Wyse, E. M. Stickney, D. Butz, A. Beckler, and C. N. Close, “The Potential Impact of COVID‐19 on Student Learning and How Schools Can Respond,” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 60–64, 2020.[21] Project Lead The Way, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.pltw.org
taught various engineering courses including Engineering Graphics, Solid Modeling, CAD/CAM, and Civil Engineering Drawing for industrial, mechanical, and civil engineering students. Currently, he is a Ph.D. candidate and graduate research assistant at the mechanical engineering department of Tennessee Tech University. His research areas are in design for additive manufacturing, composite 3D printing, and functionally graded materials. Seymur is a member and active participant of SME and ASME engineering societies.Dr. Allen Munyaradzi Mathende, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Mathende is a recent graduate from the College of Education at Tennessee Tech University. His research interests are in the use of
authors provide broadly applicable suggestions,from one junior faculty member to another, discussing ways to maximize prior experiences toexcel in the tenure service requirement category. This “Lessons Learned” paper should bepresented as a lightning talk.KeywordsStudent Leadership, Service Requirements, Tenure Track, Faculty DevelopmentIntroductionIn recent years, there were increased efforts for preparation and development of higher educationfaculty. Examples include: teaching best practices seminars for existing faculty members,teaching preparation programs for graduate students, and research grant writing programs forgraduate students and junior faculty. These programs and practices have shown significantimprovements in junior faculty’s
positive impacts. This paper intends to share findings from the threecohorts of students served by the SEECRS program, and to identify how findings can be utilizedto inform similar support structures at STEM support programs going forward.MethodsThe SEECRS project relies on both formative and summative evaluations from an externalevaluator that includes student surveys and student focus groups. This paper intends to share outintermediate findings of a much larger investigation that will utilize hierarchical linear modelingto analyze the impacts of the program on three cohorts of students when compared to a peergroup not enrolled the SEECRS program. The research group, is currently collecting retention,success (GPA), graduation, and transfer data
and cognitive amplifications of computational code; 4. The role of disciplinarily grounded, normative instructional approaches (e.g., socio-mathematical norms) in refining computational modeling; 5. Reframing coding and modeling as designing for an authentic audience; 6. The importance of using both visual and text-based programming languages for longer-term curricular integration (p. 29-30);Literature ReviewAn NSF ’Researcher Practitioner Partnership - RPP’ must showcase strong partnerships, and thisis a challenging and purposeful task. As such, the WySLICE team relies on the work of theResearch + Practice Collaboratory (researchandpractice.org) and the extensive work of thePI-Team’s Burrows and Borowczak.The ”...educational
end. Although she was atfirst concerned about teaching STEM, especially under COVID constraints, she soon foundpassion for both teaching and learning STEM material. Because the engineering curriculum shedelivered included considerable focus on computer science, and more specifically, in coding, shewas exposed to a STEM discipline that really ignited her passion and validation for her chosencareer. Simply put: This experience served as a career affirmation event that we want all PSTs toexperience during their teacher education trajectory. Kristina also experienced the true power ofcollegial and collaborative relationships during her time in practicum. Holly routinely revisitedthe best-practice research in teaching with Kristina, and those
Ethics and Societal Impacts via Cocurricular Activities.” This paper was recognized by the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice as an Editor’s Choice. Currently working with Dr. Angela Bielefeldt as a research assistant. Preparing to submit four papers regarding ethics in engineering education as co-author at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE
Design Methodology and Engineering Education. As a member of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at LaTech, Ethan’s primary research area is engineering design education with a focus on developing prototyping skills through both class-based projects and extra-curricular clubs, competitions, and activities. This includes a focus on hand-drawn sketches and how they are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, es- pecially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on the impact involvement in academic makerspaces has on students in engineering programs. American
exposure. Just-in-time modifications withTeaching Assistant (TA) support aiding in educating those practices were needed. In Fall 2020, one section of AE 124 was designated as remote only for students whowere not on campus. The same instructor taught a second mixed-mode section for on-campusstudents. Unfortunately, the number of students impacted by the pandemic, either directly orindirectly, made it necessary to hold all but one class remotely as well. Even so, the studentevaluation of teaching effectiveness (SRTE) indicated up to a one-point variant between on-campus and at-home students, from 7/7 to 6/7. The only significant difference between the twosections is the ability for students to visit the building site independently, most
Engineering at Michigan. Cassie received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and a M.S. in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Annie AnMeng Wang, University of MichiganDr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined the Bioengineering faculty at Northeastern University and be- came the Director of Life Sciences and Engineering Programs at The Roux Institute (Portland, Maine). Dr. Huang-Saad has a fourteen- year history of bringing about organizational change in higher educa- tion, leveraging evidence-based practices at University of Michigan. She created the U-M BME graduate design program, co-founded the U-M College of Engineering Center for
let aloneteacher empathy.In engineering education, though the concept of empathy is implicitly present in engineeringthrough human-centered design and user design [19], active use of empathy as a skill to connectwith customers is not commonplace in engineering “as these terms traditionally do not mesh withthe dominant image of engineering” [20, p. 2]. Much of the research on empathy and its relatedterminology [20] is focused on teaching empathy to students and how students become moreempathetic [21]–[23]. For example, Walther et al. [21] introduced empathy modules in anundergraduate mechanical course to practice empathy as a skill and provided results of thesensitive nature and complexity of teaching empathy.While most of the research in
exclusively on the United Nations SustainableDevelopment Goals (UN SDGs) and each project’s ability to achieve two goals. Students wereasked to write briefly on what the SDGs are, then choose one direct and one indirect UN SDG toincorporate into their proposed engineering design project. 1 Sustainability was first introducedwithin the context of the UN SDGs. These goals were presented as a way of incorporatingsustainability into the design projects. Each student had to identify at least one direct and oneindirect goal for their design and then the team worked together to identify the best direct andindirect goals to focus on as they developed their proposed designs. The UN SDGs helped thestudents gain an understanding of the impact engineering
utilization of mix-methods assessment to understand the internal and external factors that impact underrepresented populations in the engineering community.Dr. Jamie R. Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is the undergraduate program coordinator and a faculty member in the Mechanical Engineering Department at UMBC, Director for the Center for the innovative, teaching, research and learning and she is the Associate Director of Engineering Education Initiatives at COEIT. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to educating and developing engineers, teachers, and the community at all levels (k12, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate and faculty development). She seeks to identify
decisions aboutfuture program development [7, p. 23].” Evaluators investigated the initial implementation ofEPIC, in order to determine if the program is meeting its overarching goal and to identify areasfor improvement for future program development and implementation.Literature ReviewAreas of the research literature relevant to this evaluation include challenges of URM retentionin engineering and constructs identified to improve retention, perceptions of self-efficacy, andsense of belonging.URM Retention in EngineeringNationwide, about one in two students who start in engineering graduate from engineering, and50% of this attrition occurs during the freshman year [8]-[11]. Besterfiled-Sacre et al. [8]described education as a combination of content
is optimizing lean manufacturing in drug administration process. He is actively involved with the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and the National Society of Black Engineers.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined the Bioengineering faculty at Northeastern University and be- came the Director of Life Sciences and Engineering Programs at The Roux Institute (Portland, Maine). Dr. Huang-Saad has a fourteen- year history of bringing about organizational change in higher educa- tion, leveraging evidence-based practices at University of Michigan. She created the U-M BME graduate design program, co-founded the U-M College of Engineering Center for Entrepreneurship
. Criteria for ABET ETAC Accreditation, III. Design an Assessment Process, IV.Analysis of the Approach, and V. Best Practices. The paper concludes with summary andrecommendations for future work.I. Overview of the Engineering Technology ProgramHistoryManufacturing in the state this engineering technology program is offered has continued to growin productivity and add value by automating processes and focusing on high-value productionactivities. Due to the automation, job roles in manufacturing have become more important forproduction and require a higher level of skill sets. For example, many traditional roles can bereplaced with the robotics coordinator. These high-skill jobs pay well, offer exceptional benefitsand high-tech environment. The
culture’smisunderstanding and subordination of indigenous knowledge. It argues for the reassertion andrebuilding of traditional knowledge from its roots, its fundamental principles,” transgressingacademic boundaries, “when it requires that researchers also honor the methods and the goals ofinquiry toward which indigenous philosophical assumptions direct us” [24, p. 91]. Julia Watson’sconcept of Lo-TEK [25] positions itself at the intersection of Radical Indigenism and design, [Lo-TEK is] a movement that investigates lesser-known local technologies, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), indigenous cultural practices, and mythologies passed down as songs or stories. In contrast to the homogeneity of the modern world, indigeneity is reframed
important skill in traditionalundergraduate engineering curricula (4). Engineering students are often expected to work ingroups during laboratory or design courses, but a large portion of engineering classes arelecture-based and students compete for grades based on individual work products (6). Whilethere is a growing emphasis on implementing cooperative learning strategies in engineeringclassrooms, students need to practice teamwork skills for these learning methods to succeed (6,7). Thus, it could benefit engineering departments to ensure that there are other ways for theirundergraduates to gain experience working in teams. In recent decades, many programs have adopted active and collaborative learning in theirengineering programs, and a
multiple best paper awards and keynote presentations at international and national conferences and workshops.Dr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Joachim Walther is a Professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia and the Founding Director of the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through
engineeringchallenges for utilizing its abundant sunlight to provide energy? We capitalized on a uniqueopportunity to conduct an international collaboration between a solar power entrepreneur inSouth Sudan and an engineering professor in the USA to explore this topic. As part of anundergraduate independent study course, we designed two modules (introductory and advanced)on off-grid solar power for South Sudan. Meetings were held over zoom during the summer of2020. The student brought his practical experience of owning and operating a solar energycompany in South Sudan. The instructor brought her experience in developing educationalmaterials. Each module included learning objectives, content, and exercises. Topics includedIntroduction to energy access in South
efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
discrimination in Chile remain evident, aswitnessed by international organizations' different world rankings and studies. According toeconomic theory, the current engineering focus continues to be project assessment, often withoutconsidering any social and environmental impact.According to [3], the social crisis in Chile in October 2019 demanded equality and finishedabuses, an apposition of a hierarchical society in which a group has greater power or status. Thisdemand is directly related to the social sustainability indicated by the SDGs. Given this context,there is already an approach to equality for students who participated in this study.METHODOLOGYThis research work evaluates the impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on sustainabilitycriteria for
student outcomes of the program“Sustainability Across Sectors-Sweden.” Fig. 1 depicts a logic model for the program, highlighting the connections betweenprogram elements and desired outcomes. The rationale includes engineering workplace needs forglobal perspectives, and environmental engineering Body of Knowledge requirements. Inputsinclude engineering faculty, staff and undergraduates, best practices for short-term study abroad,and partnerships in various Swedish sectors. Activities consist of technical visits of full-scalesystems in Sweden, quantitative comparisons of engineering approaches in Sweden and the U.S.,and cultural and social interaction in Sweden. The impacts of the program include enhancedprofessional skills, additional
, and inappropriate construction practices [3], [4]. Furthermore, proper planning forinfrastructure projects, or better-called infrastructure management (IM), is often not met due tothe complexity of such projects, thus causing schedule overruns and failure to meet theforecasted budgets. Research shows that, despite the usual practices, the best way to deliver aproject is focusing on the Front-End Planning (FEP) phase, prior to authorizing its funding andsubsequent construction [5], [6]. The FEP of a project is a fundamental process of scopedefinition so that the stakeholders can address and minimize risks to accomplish improvedproject outcomes [7]. Applying FEP practices to infrastructure projects is vital for thedevelopment of these projects
the University of Portland in Portland, Ore- gon. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design from the University of Washington. An elementary school teacher at heart, she now teaches educational research and STEM methods to undergraduate and graduate students. Her research fo- cus involves bringing active learning strategies to STEM, best practices of research-practice partnerships, and applied research in partnership. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Connecting Entrepreneurial Mindset to Software DevelopmentAbstractThe purpose of this research was to develop
discipline cited a lack of community and support systems as reasons for leaving.They also suggested a high degree of difficulty in foundational courses (math, chemistry,physics) without an understanding of how the knowledge gained would be practically applied tomajor-specific coursework in the future.While major change is no longer a taboo action across higher education, it is an ever-increasingbarrier to degree attainment and these barriers increase as time continues before a change ismade [4]. Major changes for STEM students, especially at colleges without a common first- andsecond-year curriculum, place large burdens on students. These burdens come in the form ofincreased time to graduation, increased use of often finite financial resources, loss
- protocolwith-reflective-questions/. [Accessed May 2021].[8] R. H. Hargraves, S. Hofrenning, J. Bowers, M. D. R. Beisiegel, V. Piercey and E. Slate Young, "Structured Engagement for a Multi-Instiututional Collaborative to Tackle Challenges and Share Best Practices," Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 3, 2020.[9] M. A. Priles, "The Fishbowl Discussion: A Strategy Large Honors Classes," The English Journal, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 49-50, 1993.[10] S. Hofrenning, R. H. Hargraves, T. Chen, A. V. Filippas, R. Fitzgerald, J. Hearn, L. J. Kayes, J. Kunz and R. Segal, "Promoting Discussion: Promoting Collaborations Between Mathematics and Partner Disciplines," Journal of Mathematics and
, and Master’s and Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University. Dr. Das teaches a variety of courses ranging from freshmen to advanced graduate level such as Mechanics of Materials, Introductory and Advanced Finite Element Method, Engineering Design, Introduction to Mechatronics, Mechatronic Modeling and Sim- ulation, Mathematics for Engineers, Electric Drives and Electromechanical Energy Conversion. He led the effort in the college to start several successful programs: an undergraduate major in Robotics and Mechatronic Systems Engineering, a graduate certificate in Advanced Electric Vehicles. Dr. Das’s areas of research interests are modeling and simulation of multi-disciplinary engineering problems