(International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on engineering education; design tools
, “Chemical Engineering Major Selection Throughout the First Year: A Mixed-Methods Approach,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[8] X. Chen, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr, “A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[9] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering Matriculation Paths: Outcomes of Direct Matriculation, First-Year Engineering, and Post-General Education Models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2012.[10] C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Long, S. M. Lord, M. W
during the design process. It does not directly measure changes in how theyapproach the process, but instead measures changes in how they describe and conceptualize theirapproach. This is a limitation of our research methods.Scoring ProcedureResponses from students enrolled in the Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 offerings of SEED Labwere scored. In Spring 2018, 18 students completed both the pre and the post case studies and 31students completed both in Spring 2019, for a total sample size of 49. Each of these studentscompleted both the pre and the post case study, for a total of 98 case study responses. TABLE 1 SCORING RUBRIC
persuasion, and Dimension 5: Abstract vs. non-abstractinformation. In the academic year (AY) 2019-2020, total of 97 student artifacts (N = 97) werecollected. For this analysis, we grouped documents into similar assignment genres: research-papers (n = 28), technical reports and analyses (n = 5), and engineering laboratory reports (n =35), with individual engineering students represented at least once in the laboratory report andonce in another category. Findings showed that engineering lab reports are highly informational,minimally-persuasive, and featured more immediate elaboration on claims and data. Conversely,students’ research papers in academic writing courses were highly involved, highly persuasive,and used deferred elaboration. The analyses
Paper ID #32621Project-based Learning in a Persistent COVID-19 EnvironmentCade FleaherMr. Dechathon Suwanakeree, United States Military AcademyMr. Scott Amos CollinsGeoff KirkMr. Antonio La TorreLt. Peyton James PisacaneLt. Col. Kevin P. Arnett P.E., United States Military Academy LTC Kevin Arnett is a fifth year Assistant Professor at the US Military Academy. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2001, his M.S. Civil Engineering from U.C. Berkeley in 2011, and his PhD in Structural Engineering from UCSD in 2019. He teaches structural analysis and design of steel structures, and is a licensed Professional
, W.F. Denetclaw, C.G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, G.H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C.M. Okpodu, T.J. Robinson, M.F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, & M. Zavala. “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM.” CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 15(3), pp. 1-10, 2016.[5] L.V. Garcia-Felix. “Latinos not engaging in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers.” Journal of Academic Perspectives. Vol 4, pp. 1-21, 2019.[6] D. Hernandez, S. Rana, A. Rao, & M. Usselman. “Dismantling stereotypes about Latinos in STEM.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 39(4), pp 436-451, 2017.[7] C. Peralta, M. Caspary, & D. Boothe. “Success factors impacting Latina/o
risk toAfrican-American defendants than to Caucasian defendants (Larson, Mattu, Kirchner & Angwin,2016). New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) has employed the ManhattanTraffic Model that fails to disaggregate transportation data by gender (Perez, 2019), therebyplacing an extra burden on caregivers, predominantly female care workers, who must take multiplebuses to navigate the city's periphery. Software systems used for policing that deploy predictivealgorithms like Chicago's Strategic Subject List (SSL) disproportionately target African Americanindividuals and neighborhoods for increased policing (Brayne 2017; Ferguson 2017; Karppi 2018;Sheehey 2018). The significance of systems that are engineered by technologists for
analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 31, pp. 542–550, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.031.[15] B. Hui and S. Farvolden, “How Can Learning Analytics Improve a Course?,” in Proceedings of the 22Nd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, New York, NY, USA, 2017, p. 1:1-1:6, doi: 10.1145/3085585.3085586.[16] C. Brozina and D. Knight, “Learning Management Systems: What More can we Know?,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, p. 26.1072.1-26.1072.14, doi: 10.18260/p.24409.[17] E. Duval et al., “Learning dashboards & learnscapes,” Educ. Interfaces Softw. Technol., pp. 1–5, Jan
: using a randomised control trial to estimate the impact of an at-home lab kit on student attitudes and achievement in a MOOC,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 234-252, 2019.[5] J. Donnell, P. Varney, D. MacNair, A. Ferri, “Optimizing Efficiency and Effectiveness in a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory using Focused Modules,” in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017.[6] J. Ma and J. Nickerson, “Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 3, 2006.[7] M. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual
, pp. 140–149.[13] M. ElZomor, D. Garber, and P. Pradhananga, “Alternative Technical Concepts for Contract Delivery Methods in Accelerated Bridge Construction,” 2020. doi: 10.17226/22419.[14] D. Buenaño-Fernandez, W. Villegas-CH, and S. Luján-Mora, “The use of tools of data mining to decision making in engineering education—A systematic mapping study,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 744–758, 2019, doi: 10.1002/cae.22100.[15] P. Pradhananga, M. Elzomor, G. Santi, and A. M. Sadri, “Integrative pedagogical framework to support construction students’ professional skills and engagement,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020, vol. 2020-June, doi
J.F., Bringle R.G. The effects of an intensive research experience on the careers oftalented undergraduates. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 1990;24:1–5.[17] Gregerman, S. (1999) Improving the Academic Success of Diverse Students ThroughUndergraduate Research." Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterlv, 20. 5459.[18] Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisionsand Active Learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.[19] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. (2019) Nurturing Brilliance in Engineering: Creating ResearchVenues for Undergraduate Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering as an Initiative fromFaculty Members that Foster Academic Inclusion, Development, and Post-graduation Instruction.2019 ASEE Annual
# 978-1-63487-265-2 • Recommended Practice for Daylighting Buildings, 2013 (co-author), IESNA, New York, USA, ISNB # 978-0-87995-281-5 • Design Guidelines for Sustainable Biological Stations, 2010, Oklahoma Academy of Sciences, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA, ISBN # 978-0-9843264-1-9 (online book) Selected Conference Papers • Mansy, Challenging Conventional Wisdom in the Age of Computing, ASES National Solar Conference, 2018, Boulder, Colorado, August 5-8, 2018 • Mansy, Energy perfor- mance within integrative design, barriers in academia, ASES National Solar Conference, 2017, Denver, Colorado 9-12 October, 2017 • Mansy, Daylight rules-of-thumb experimentally examined, ASEE 2017, Midwest Section Conference, Stillwater
Paper ID #32839The Perception of Sustainable Design and Construction: Case Study ofConstruction Students at Two UniversitiesDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He has completed Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with a total of 18 years academic experience at five different universities. He
, and have developed and/or co-facilitated several faculty development workshops, including UBC’s three-day course design institute, and, under the guidance of Bill Oakes, the one-day ASEE Service Learning workshop. I am a trained peer reviewer of teaching, and have over 10 years experience providing both formative and summative peer reviews. Currently, in addition to being curious about how best to train engineering students to work effectively in transdisciplinary teams, I am working with the Municipal Natural Asset Initiative to embed natural asset management techniques into engineering education.Dr. Peter M Ostafichuk P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Peter M. Ostafichuk is a professor of
Z. Wang, Challenges of Student Equity and Engagement in a HyFlex Course, in Blended Learning Designs in STEM Higher Education. 2019, Springer. p. 209- 230.2. Abdelmalak, M.M.M. and J.L. Parra, Case Study of HyFlex Course Design: Benefits and Challenges for Graduate Students, in Innovative Applications of Online Pedagogy and Course Design. 2018, IGI Global. p. 298-317.3. Beatty, B.J., Teaching a Hybrid-Flexible Course. Hybrid-Flexible Course Design, 2019.4. Miller, J.B. and M. Baham. Comparing the HyFlex (hybrid-flexible) model of course delivery in an introductory statistics course and a probability and statistics course for engineers and scientists. in International Conference on Teaching
-arounds. Thepurpose in sharing this experience is to inform other instructors of how easy this is to implementin these two solid mechanics courses and to inspire other instructors to create their own teachingtools. Because solid modeling is almost universally being taught to engineers in lieu of thetraditional drafting and 2D CAD and because 3D printers are common in maker-spaces anddesign labs, creating these or similar learning tools is easily done by instructors or students aspart of a class project. These pass-arounds and others like it can be used instead of expensiveinstructional aids from commercial vendors.II. ApproachBeginning just before the Fall semester of 2019, the author worked with a colleague withsignificant experience working
effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," Teachers College Record, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 1-47, 2013.[4] R. Bachnak, Rafic, S. S. Marikunte, and A. B. Shafaye, "Fundamentals of ABET accreditation with the newly approved changes." In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, pp. 16-19. 2019.[5] V. Kaptelinin and B. A. Nardi, Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT press, 2006.[6] A. Blunden, "An interdisciplinary concept of activity," Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2009.[7] B. Bligh and M. Flood, "Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses
University, 196, 2016.[11] A. Keune and K. Peppler, "Materials‐to‐develop‐with: The making of a makerspace," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 280-293, 2019.[12] S. Mersand, "The State of Makerspace Research: a Review of the Literature," TechTrends, pp. 1-13, 2020.[13] S. L. Martinez and G. Stager, Invent to learn, 2nd ed. ed. (Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom). Torrance, Canada: Construting Modern Knowledge, 2019.[14] F. Turner, "Millenarian tinkering: The puritan roots of the maker movement," Technology and culture, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. S160-S182, 2018.[15] I. Seidman, Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the
productive as well as create work-life balance.The typologies are statistically derived from cluster analyses on the parameters from the TTIreports of 251 undergraduate engineering students who took the assessment suite between 2017and 2019 as well as 93 graduate students from a selective professional master program. Clusteranalysis has been used in engineering education research over the last two decades [1] tounderstand the relationship between the future aspirations of engineering students and how theyconduct themselves while in college [2, 3] as well as to inform curriculum redesign [4, 5].These typologies are matched with generalized categories of engineering jobs to provide newinsights and techniques for strengthening the engineering talent
Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 196–216, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200.[2] K. H. Altman, “Cognition in Natural Settings: The Cultural Lens Model,” in Cultural Ergonomics, vol. 4, M. Kaplan, Ed. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2004, pp. 249–280. doi: 10.1016/S1479-3601(03)04009-8.[3] J. Z. Namenwirth, and R. Weber, Dynamics of Culture, 1st ed. Routledge, 1987. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.routledge.com/Dynamics-of- Culture/Namenwirth-Weber/p/book/9781138699489[4] P. Sharma, “Measuring personal cultural orientations: Scale development and validation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 787–806, 2010.[5] J. Mahadevan, “Intercultural engineering beyond
-high-wage-ohio/?agreed=1[2] A. Carrick, “Series (1 of 7): Rankings of States by Industrial Sub-Sector Jobs – Manufacturing:”,January 2019, [Online] Available:https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/economic/2019/01/series-1-7-rankings-statesindustrial-sub-sector-jobs-weight-concentration-maps-manufacturing )Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Departmentof Commerce. www.bea.gov[3] Program Insights, Burning Glass Technologies, January 2020, [Online] Available:(https://www.burning-glass.com)[4] K. S. Rawat and G. H. Massiha, "A hands-on laboratory-based approach to undergraduate roboticseducation," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04.2004, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2004, pp. 1370-1374 Vol.2.[5] M
Education and on the Advisory Board for the Journal of Engineering Education. He was selected as a Fellow of ASEE in 2008 and of ASME in 2012. He holds a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Penn State, an M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from RPI, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-In-Progress: Impact of the Entrepreneurial Mindset for Innovative Teaching (EMIT) AcademyAbstractThis work-in-progress paper describes the development and evaluation of an innovative facultydevelopment initiative that incorporates entrepreneurial mindset (EM) and
., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 04021002, May 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000889.[7] Y. Yang and D. W. Carroll, “Gendered Microaggressions in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” p. 18.[8] M. J. Lee, J. D. Collins, S. A. Harwood, R. Mendenhall, and M. B. Huntt, “‘If you aren’t White, Asian or Indian, you aren’t an engineer’: racial microaggressions in STEM education,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 48, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020- 00241-4.[9] C. Poleacovschi, S. Feinstein, S. Luster-Teasley, and M. Berger, “An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions in Engineering Programs,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., Jun. 2019, Accessed: Mar. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https
, 2013.[2] C. D. Troy, R. R. Essig, B. K. Jesiek, J. Boyd and N. M. Trellinger, "Writing to learn engineering: identifying effective techniques for the integration of written communication into engineering classes curricula," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[3] N. T. Buswell, B. K. Jesiek, C. S. Troy, R. R. Essig and J. Boyd, "Engineering instructors on writing: perceptions, practices, and needs," IEEE Transactions on professional communication, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 55-74, 2019.[4] Brown university catalog, “graduation requirements”, March 2021.[5] Duke university catalog, “graduation requirements”, March 2021.[6] Yale university catalog, “graduation requirements”, March 2021.[7] Harvard university
Paper ID #34563ABET’s Maverick Evaluators and the Limits of Accreditation as a Mode ofGovernance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional
En- gineering Design. Dr. McCullough has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research interests include Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recogni- tion, and Bioinformatics. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, and is the delegate of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE to the Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Dr. Svetlana Chesser, Auburn University Svetlana Chesser is an Assistant Clinical Professor of Educational Psychology at Auburn University. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Auburn
seen double digit percent growth (2018: 27.1%, 2019: 15.8%, 2020: 19.5%). In fact, the engineering technology program enrollments currently represent 7.1% of the college’s undergraduate enrollment, the highest it has been in the past eleven years. In retrospect, it is clear that the move to General Engineering has increased the visibility of engineering technology in the college. More importantly, when students have an opportunity to experience the first-year math, science and engineering courses prior to choosing a discipline, they are able to make a more informed choice based on their interests, career goals, and natural abilities. 2) Impact on Pathways into Engineering Technology – Prior to 2014, the
. 28, no. 8, pp. 649– 660, 1991, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280803.[4] M. T. H. Chi, R. D. Roscoe, J. D. Slotta, M. Roy, and C. C. Chase, “Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes,” Cognitive Science, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–61, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x.[5] J. Z. Kelter, J. D. Emery, and U. Wilensky, “Learning About Diffusion at Two Levels: Micro-scale-computational to macro-scale-analytical,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020.[6] U. Wilensky and M. Resnick, “Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1009421303064.[7] S. T. Levy and U
stakeholders, discovery, opportunity identification, and value creation into problem-based learning modules with examples and assessment specific to fluid mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26724.[7] J. Wheadon and N. Duval-Couetil, “Elements of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: KEEN White Paper,” J. Eng. Entrep., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 17–25, 2016.[8] J. Blessing, K. Mekemson, and D. Pistrui, “Building an entrepreneurial engineering ecosystem for future generations: The Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2008, doi: 10.18260/1-2--3488.[9] R. C. Schank, A. Fano, B. Bell
Professor in 2013 and Full Professor in 2019 . Dr. Chrysochoou’s general research area is environmental geochemistry, with a focus on site remediation, characterization and reuse of industrial waste and construction materials. Dr. Chrysochoou’s serves as the Principal Investigator of the project ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Department program, this 5-year project aims at transforming educational practices and cultivate the potential of neurodivergent individuals to contribute to engineering breakthroughsDr. Arash E. Zaghi, University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is an Associate Professor in the