courseobjectives and had positively impacted their students’ learning. Users indicated that they woulduse the materials again in the future and recommend them to their colleagues.IntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) is aneducational supplement that aims to prepare engineering graduates who possess not onlytechnical skills but also social skills and global awareness in order to tackle the challenges facingsociety in the 21st century [1]. Students in the program achieve the following five competenciesthrough their engagement in individually selected courses and extracurricular experiences: TalentCompetency, Multidisciplinary Competency, Viable Business/Entrepreneurship Competency,Multicultural
studentswho are seeking a degree in higher education. Student success can be directly linked topreparation for classes including the reading of assigned chapters in a textbook, taking lecturenotes, reviewing classroom materials and frequent attendance. A common problem at manyhigher education institutions is that students from impoverished backgrounds have limitedfunding and frequently do not purchase textbooks or other supplemental material due to the needfor the allocation of limited finances to more pressing things. Indiana State University has a highpercentage of students from impoverished backgrounds with 50 percent of the currently enrolledstudents receiving Federal Pell Grants [1]. Additionally 55 percent of the current students at
Michigan and the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronau- tics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014 and a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan in 2008. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Open-Ended Modeling Group Projects in Introductory Statics and Dynamics CoursesTraditionally, the types of problems that students see in their introductory statics and dynamicscourses are well-structured textbook problems with a single solution [1]. These types ofquestions are often seen by students as being
-related safety protocols.No major problems were encountered related to compliance with COVID-19 policies orprecautions, and there was no indication that any students, TAs, or instructors contracted anillness as a result of attending the lab. Results of a survey of student perceptions of the labexperience indicated that students felt safe attending lab in person and preferred it to potentialvirtual options.The purposes of this paper are: 1) to provide guidelines and best practices to Unit Operationscourses which have not yet returned to in-person instruction, 2) to record experiences andstrategies from the COVID-19 pandemic to inform future instructors and administrators in theevent of another pandemic or similar event, and 3) to present and
the uncertainty about the ability to conduct future REUprograms onsite amidst a pandemic of unknown duration, it was decided to undertake thedevelopment of a model for online-based REUs and evaluate it using the evaluation tools thathave been applied for some time to onsite programs. This paper presents the REU program atNorth Dakota State University during the summer of 2020 and its assessment. An overview ofthe program, as it ran in 2020, is provided. This is compared to the way the program operated inprior years as an onsite program. Specific changes that were made and their impact on theequivalency of the program to prior years are discussed. The approach used is presented as amodel for potential use by other programs in the future.1
Paper ID #33546Opportunity in Design: Extending and Enriching the Purpose ofEngineering EducationDr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational success strate- gies, and b) understanding how Latinx students
-cohorttransmission. Post-pandemic, the proposed method can be applied in many cohort-based learninguse cases.IntroductionSince the novel virus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic [1] in March2020, strict social distancing measures were enacted onto the populace to ensure public healthand safety. Academic institutions were forced into school closures, and shifted towards remotecontent delivery. Over 144 million students across the globe [2], from Indonesia [3] to SaudiArabia [4], were impacted by the need to receive their education through online learning.With the increased global access to stable Information and Communication Technology (ICT)infrastructure, online learning saw an increase in popularity recently [5]. This mode of learning
specially designed curriculum interventionscan afford a more inclusive learning experience. Optimizing Design Experiences for Future Engineers in Chemistry LaboratoryRetaining undergraduate engineering students is a critical issue, particularly those who identifyas female or as members of an underrepresented ethnic minority (URM) [1]–[3]. Our localcircumstance parallels that of the nation, an unacceptably low-level of student retention, which isparticularly prevalent for freshman students in general chemistry. This situation is complicatedby the nature of introductory science and mathematics courses, which are notoriouslychallenging and intimidating [4]–[6]. Targeted curriculum interventions may be one
University of Colorado Boulder in August of 2011 and an MS degree in Computer Science Education at Stanford University. Her research interests include computational fluid dynamics, numerical methods, and computer science education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Oral Proficiency Exams in High Enrollment Computer Sciences CoursesABSTRACTOral proficiency exams were implemented in introductory computer science (CS) courses at apublic research minority-serving university. The use of oral exams is motivated by two factors:(1) large CS enrollments; (2) remote learning. The three research questions of this
and his B.S. in chemical engineering with honors from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Han has over 25 years of experience in electronic and pho- tonic materials engineering and fabrication. His current research topics include (1) writable/rewritable quantum structures by stress patterning; (2) low-cost, crack-tolerant, advanced metallization for solar cell durability; (3) thin film processing and nanoscale surface corrugation for enhanced light trapping for pho- tovoltaic devices; and (4) microsphere-based manufacturable coatings for radiative cooling. He has close to 70 publications in peer-reviewed journals and over 200 invited/contributed papers at academic insti- tutions, national laboratories
was one of theinstitutions awarded the NSF S-STEM grant. Our program uses effective strategies suggested inprevious studies to address students’ psychosocial needs to enhance retention and graduation inengineering. The targeted psychosocial variables include self-efficacy and outcome expectations,engineering identity, sense of belonging, and academic integration. Addressing these variables iscritical for developing effective STEM education programs. Many previous studies demonstrated benefits of intensive mentoring with at-risk students[1-3]. Mentoring is an essential catalyst for fostering academic success and is especiallyimportant for women and students who are traditionally underrepresented in STEM fields.Research experience is
concept of perfectionism, research methods and findingsof it, and a method to cope with it that can simplify our life.A brief overview on Perfectionism Terms and DefinitionsThe American Psychological Association (APA) defines perfectionism as “a tendency to demandof others or oneself an extremely high or even flawless level of performance, in excess of what isrequired by the situation” [1]. In this paper, the focus is on the demands of oneself that lead tomaladaptive behaviors and feelings like procrastination and paralyzing anxiety. This approachincludes perfectionism cognitions and perfectionistic self-representations.Perfectionism cognitions are the automatic thoughts that reflect the need to be perfect andawareness of imperfections whereas
within the company.This approach enables leaders to construct a customized development plan to enhance andincrease their leadership attributes and capabilities as they take responsibility for their ownleadership development. Opportunities exist at Micron to strengthen senior leader sponsorshipand involvement in the establishment of a sustainable leadership development culture.Literature ReviewLeadership development is defined as expanding the collective capacity of organizational leadersand team members to more effectively engage in leadership roles and processes [1]. Theseleadership roles include those that come with and without formal authority within anorganization. Leadership processes are those that enable groups to work together in a
colleges have discontinued in-person teaching practices for safety and healthconsiderations. Since social distancing is currently preeminent, the teaching and learningenvironments might become a challenge for faculty and students. Online mode of education is notnew at the college level and has become a ubiquitous practice because of the spread of the internet[1], [2], [3]. However, online education can be unengaging due to many reasons including personalattention, lack of social interaction, and excess of theory-based course content [4].Recently, more studies of online education have focused on student engagement given itsimportance to education and learning quality [4], [5], [6]. Student engagement is typically definedas the time and effort that
implementation, and students’online educational experiences. Also, the results of a questionnaire having four quantitativequestions, lab reports having two open-ended questions, and students’ tests performances aredescribed and analyzed, all comparing the f2f to online PL and PL + PPPL methods.Previous Work Modern educational thought has recognized early that practical laboratory experiences andprojects are important parts of learning [1]. This work is inspired by Kolb’s Experiential LearningCycle (KLC) [2] where Kolb claims that learners learn best (fully disregarding his previous modelof Preferred Learning Styles) when they follow a cyclical process consisting of four steps:experiencing, watching, thinking/modeling, and applying/doing. This
solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand challenges of the 21st century.Prof. Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico Dr. Han is a Regents Professor in the Departments of Chemical & Biological Engineering and Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico. He earned his Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara and his B.S. in chemical engineering with honors from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Han has over 25 years of experience in electronic and pho- tonic materials engineering and fabrication. His current research topics include (1) writable/rewritable quantum structures
, reducing cost, and expandingaccess to nontraditional students unable to participate in residential programs.IntroductionEach year, the National Science Foundation provides grants to institutions of higher education tofund research internships for undergraduate students. These internship programs, titled“Research Experiences for Undergraduates” (REUs), each “consist of a group of ten or soundergraduates who work in the research programs of the host institution. Each student isassociated with a specific research project, where he/she works closely with the faculty and otherresearchers” [1]. The REU funding structure is intended to provide research opportunities tostudents who may not have access to undergraduate research opportunities at their
delivery model was originally developed to help increase enrollment byallowing students to participate in a class without being physically present in a classroom [1]. Ithas become widely implemented in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic because of theflexibility it offers both students and faculty. Using the HyFlex model, instructors build contentfor both a fully online course and a ‘face-to-face’ classroom environment. The HyFlex courseuses both learning environments in tandem, sharing the same learning outcomes each week sothat students can move between online and in-person experiences in the course seamlessly.CSCI 159: Computer Science Problem Solving was identified as a course to be offered via onlineand then online-based HyFlex models to
direct contact with students. The curriculumrevisions (Figure 1.1) attempted to maintain the content focus of the original lessons. Revised Curriculum Biometrics 1. September 21: Fingerprinting, Part 1-video on-line September 24: Friday Live Chat on Biometrics 2. September 28: Fingerprinting, Part 2- video on-line October 1: Thursday Live Chat on Biometrics Health and Beauty: Biodiversity I 3. October 5: Estimating Biodiversity- video on-line October 8: Thursday
withequipment in the lab. Large enrollment courses typically employ TAs to make the course moremanageable for the instructor. Depending on the institution and the course, TAs may be eitherundergraduate students or graduate students.TAs have many different kinds of responsibilities depending on the institution, the subjectmatter, the instructor, and the course structure. However, some common TA responsibilitiesinclude lecturing, leading discussions, leading review sessions, conducting labs, grading studentassignments, motivating students, helping students feel comfortable, providing feedback tostudents, assessing student prior and current knowledge and understanding, applying formativeassessments, and completing training programs [1]. Much literature
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Overcoming Comfort Zones to Better the Self-Efficacy of Undergraduate Engineering Students (Tricks of the Trade) (WIP)INTRODUCTIONCommunity College SuccessInvolvement in co-curricular activities, including participation in student and professionalorganizations, can significantly enhance the overall educational experience [1]. Engineeringprograms in community colleges strive to reinforce student engagement that increases studentacademic and extracurricular success. [2-5] One factor that reduces engagement amongststudents in co-curricular activities is low self-efficacy. [6] Students believe that participation inco-curricular activities will take time from their academics [7] regardless of the
our selection criteria, thirty-two articles were identified for this review. Four majorthemes were present throughout the literature related to academic socialization: interests inSTEM, self-efficacy, STEM identity formation, and academic performance. The selected articlesare summarized below as well as in the appendix on table 1 and figure 1 to 3.Academic Socialization and Interests in STEMResearch continues to emphasize the importance of parental involvement in increasing females'self-confidence, engagement, and interests within STEM-related fields19,20. Majority of thearticles identified in this literature review focused on the role parents play in fostering the STEMinterests of students during their high school and college
[1]. Because design problems arenot linear like more canonical problems, design problems must be framed and reframed by thedesigner throughout the process to achieve success. Problem framing is endemic to design [2]and involves both understanding and defining the scope of the problem. The process of problemframing is consequential not only for the problem itself (effecting the resulting design bydeciding what is important or must be focused on) but for the designer personally, as thedesigner learns and interprets information based on their experience [3]. Thus problem framingincludes agency, or the ability and empowerment to make decisions.The ability to make decisions within a problem is bounded by the opportunity structure [4],which
development workshop for teachers or a careerday for students. Though these may introduce a teacher or student to engineering, they are lesslikely to provide sustained improvements in terms of broadening participation or decreasingmisalignments of engineering. In addition, single interventions are unlikely to cause significantimprovement in teacher confidence to teach engineering. In an effort to improve teacherconfidence of engineering curriculum and to reduce teacher and student mis-conceptions ofengineering, this NSF funded ITEST project used a collaborative model to provide industry andUniversity support to middle school science teachers to 1) develop approximately monthlyscience activities (curriculum) with a contextually relevant engineering
neural engineering research [1]. The commission arguedthat the purpose of such deep collaboration “is to engage in ethical analysis and reflection andbring ethical decisions and assumptions inherent to the practice of science to the forefront toassess their merits, develop new standards or modify old ones, and reform practices whereneeded” [1]. Neuroethics, as defined by Wolpe [2], “involves the analysis of, and remedialrecommendations for, the ethical challenges posed by chemical, organic, and electromechanicalinterventions in the brain.” The need for this interdisciplinary area of study has become moreevident with our increasing ability to understand, monitor, and intervene with the human brain[3].Müller and Rotter [4] define neurotechnology
presentations), Connections with the university fundraising arm for more marketing and advancement opportunities for the student groups and units, Improved student/alumni relations, and Opportunities for faculty to know the students and their skills which leads to more successful recommendation letters for the students.Start looking at student groups as partners to support the unit’s mission. This partnershipactively promotes the students and their groups while helping the department or college.Introduction: The importance of student participation in students groups has been demonstratedby studies. For universities, students rank “student life as one of the top three reasons forchoosing a university.[1] Student
have seen little structuralor philosophical changes in the period since. In recent decades, workforce needs and theemployment landscape for STEM graduates has experienced fundamental changes in scale andscope. While the number of STEM-related jobs has risen significantly [1], [2] the range of STEMcareers has also expanded sharply [1], [2] . In the recent National Academies of Sciences,Engineering, and Medicine study report focused on Graduate STEM education for the 21st century[3], the authors observe that “Indeed, recent surveys of employers and graduates and studies ofgraduate education suggest that many graduate programs do not adequately prepare students totranslate their knowledge into impact in multiple careers.” In spite of the
thisperiod, Virtual Labs became the only available means to provide instructional labs to theenrolled students since all students were sent home. That is, the school closures made us changethe way that we used Virtual Labs and necessitated us to modify the course delivery method sothat the lab courses could be performed fully online. Therefore, in this paper, we explained howthe transition took place in the aerospace structures lab for the use of Virtual Labs before, during,and after the COVID-19 school closures. Then, we discussed lessons learned during this period.This paper will be a useful reference for engineering educators who seek to implement orintegrate virtual technology into their pedagogy.1. IntroductionIn our previous study [1], we
department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Pavan Meadati, Kennesaw State University Pavan Meadati, Ph.D., LEED AP, is a professor in Construction Management Department. He received Doctorate in Engineering
program to earn aminor in Computing Applications. Many of these courses are taught by non-CS faculty and thecourse contents are adapted for life sciences students. Every course is assigned a dedicated groupof peer mentors who assist instructors and students during lectures and hold separate mentoringsessions every week. The curriculum for the Computing Applications minor (aka PINC minor) consists of thefollowing five courses, and the recommended course sequence is as follows: Fall (Year 1, Semester 1) ● CSc 306: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Computer Programming Spring (Year 1, Semester 2) ● CSc 219: Data Structures and Algorithms Fall (Year 2, Semester 3) ● CSc 308: An Interdisciplinary