still happen? What software tools could be leveraged? How wouldfaculty and students adapt? A rolling parade of cancellations plagued each colleges’ summerofferings for high school students: everything in May, then June, then July and August wascanceled. The months of hard work and planning for the summers’ educational events were nowfor naught and this reality had negative effects on the morale of both faculty and staff. Almost asan afterthought, the TriU Partnership circled back to the idea of an online event and held its firstTriU Committee planning meetings on May 8, 2020. Working as one team and on a tight timeschedule, the TriU Committee brainstormed ideas, decided on a direction and freely sharedresources. After many long meetings, The
anundergraduate-only, project-focused curriculum. Students are given instruction and mustdemonstrate their abilities to execute team-based design and to build projects in all of their fouryears of study. The pedagogical basis for their required design classes is governed by aProfessional Plan, assuring that by graduation all ME students experience key areas of theengineering profession and show the ability to perform at an acceptable professional level.The authors of this paper have delivered the freshman and sophomore design classes at WKU formore than a decade. The courses are stable; student performance in all aspects of design havebeen consistently assessed and deemed successful. The stability of this aspect of the curriculumwas thrown into
. Likewise, efforts mostly but not entirely led by the abovementionedfaculty commission, such as the annual offering of a teaching workshop and teaching conference,as well as new faculty training, a variety of seminars and teaching chats, and voluntary peerobservation all work to reinforce a university culture that is focused on quality teaching andpedagogical development.According to our university’s mission, we provide “a hands-on, project-based learningenvironment” and we aspire to be on the leading edge of “innovative teaching.”Indeed, this phrase appears in a recently released strategic plan, which further emphasizesexcellence and the guiding value of “embracing and celebrating the highest quality standards inteaching.”Though our university is
a new approach, inwhich laboratory activities based on 21st-century engineering problems are used to enhancestudents' higher-order thinking skills and reinforce fundamental knowledge. Topics of thelaboratory activities included Sustainability, Machine Learning, Additive Manufacturing,Autonomy and Robotics, and Energy. In this course, students apply their prior knowledge in HeatTransfer, Fluid Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, Materials, and Chemistry and integrating with newmaterial to solve complex engineering problems involved multiples principles. To graduallyimprove student's critical thinking ability, we structured this course into six levels, following theRevised Bloom's taxonomy. Students use their cognitive skills to plan and conduct
Paper ID #34459Lessons Learned: College Student Surveys as a Professional DevelopmentToolDr. Dick Apronti, Angelo State University Dick Apronti is an assistant professor at Angelo State University. He teaches transportation engineering courses, engineering graphics, and plane surveying. His research interests are in transportation safety and planning. Dick Apronti also has interests in projects that improve access to higher education and college retention for minorities and under-represented groups. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Lessons
, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis committed that Florida would chart a course for students tobe prepared for Jobs of the Future and the State to rank first nationally in Workforce Educationby 2030[7]. Florida’s Perkins V State Plan, in alignment with Executive Order 19-31,necessitates alignment of the secondary and postsecondary programs with the future of work andspecifically “emphasizes experiential learning, a tighter and more intentional alignment toindustry demand, increased access for special populations and a more innovative approach tohow workforce education is structured and delivered [5].”Florida’s Experiential Learning Framework for Perkins Size, Scope, and Quality [6] definesexperiential learning as providing students with opportunities
societyand how engineering processes work [7-11]. Several studies reported that engineering-focused teacher PD programs and short courses were effective at developing theparticipating teachers’ knowledge of the engineering design process and positivelyimproving their perceptions of engineering [4, 11-16]. Some other studies stated that PDprograms provided the necessary knowledge and motivation to the teachers to implementengineering concepts and practices into their curricula [9, 17, 18].In the present study, the research team has designed, planned, and implemented a two-week summer PD program for middle school science and mathematics teachers. Theprogram had ten periods each lasted eight hours. Through this engineering focused PDendeavor, teachers
technology. Theinstructor used a FARO laser scanner to record a wall’s displacement for out-of-plan loadsand a destructive test to clearly explain the mechanical behavior of the rubble walls of thetarget house for students [8].The American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) is a private non-profitcorporation, which accredits construction education programs in colleges and universities thatrequest its evaluation and meet its standards and criteria. The primary goal of ACCE is topromote and improve construction education in colleges and universities. By workingtogether through ACCE, stakeholders representing the construction community and the publicat large, construction educators, and constructors establish and maintain standards and
, statistical analysis, simulation processes, optimization techniques, and risk analysis at the strategic and network management level. Among his research sponsors are the National High- way Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP), Metropolitan Transportation Commission in California (MTC), the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the El Paso Metropolitan Planning Organiza- tion (MPO), and the City of El Paso. His academic work is documented in more than 100 publications in peer- reviewed national and international journals, conference proceedings, books, and technical reports. Dr. Chang also serves as the Chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, and Vice President of isMARTI in the U. S Research Coordinator
creative ways to solve real-world engineering problems and ensures students get experience in planning, design, research, manufacturing and project management before they graduate. Dr. Kathir is a member of ASCE’s Committee on Accreditation.Dr. Erik Knudsen, George Mason University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Capstone Design - Unexpected Challenges and Opportunities due to the Covid-19 PandemicAbstractDue to the Covid-19 pandemic George Mason University (Mason), similar to many institutions,had to suddenly switch to online delivery of all courses in March 2020. As the director of seniorprojects (first
approaches to equity. Titled “Power, Equity,and Praxis in Computing,” the course plan is discussed and assessed through three facets: thecourse’s purpose, its content, and its (intended) learning environment. The purpose of the courseis to make space for undergraduate computing students to explore how systems of power arecoproduced with computing so that students can practice making social justice-centeredtransformations as critical participants of their field. The content of the course plan is organizedthrough modules that overview opportunities and considerations for intervention in computing.The learning environment is discussed through commitments to queer and critical racepedagogies, interdisciplinarity, and mixed methods in which teacher
, visioning and decision-making.The content that students explore within these themes is intended to encourage the developmentof self-authorship, a critical foundation to decision-making for first-year students [2]. At the endof the course, students design a Personal Action Plan for their educational experience at theUniversity of Michigan.The structure of the course has been substantially revised to align with these themes as part ofthe Foundational Course Initiative. The course includes two primary structural elements:synchronous, weekly discussion sections and asynchronous, self-paced online modules. Thisformat is designed to provide choice within a well-defined structure and to support the courselearning goals, particularly those related to self
Paper ID #34171Cross Sectional Assessment of CEM Curriculum Offerings at thePre-college level in North Carolina (Evaluation)Ms. Cayla Lenore Anderson, Clemson University Cayla Anderson is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Planning, Design, and Built Environment program at Clemson University. Her research interests include construction education at the pre-college level, workforce development for minorities in construction, and gender and space in- tersections on construction jobsites. Her interests stems from her experience as a Black woman in the construction industry. Cayla received a dual
plan, building and testingdesigns, making improvements, and assessing completion. In this study, facets of engineeringawareness of learners were determined by examining their ability to identify engineering-relatedpractices, strategies, and processes they used; and associating those practices, strategies, andprocesses with the construct of engineering.To conduct this exploration, researchers implemented three approaches to measure facets ofengineering awareness: observations, interviews and surveys. These methods provided data toaddress the following research questions: 1. What engineering practices do researchers observe visitors exercising? (Related to a facet of procedural knowledge) 2. From a list provided, what engineering
software are of note. These software classifications permit students to: 1) Better communicate and collaborate design ideas to a variety of team members and stakeholders beyond presentations. 2) Better organize and manage the critical tasks the team must navigate during the project. 3) Better function as a team/discipline on complex interrelated tasks. 4) Better connect students and other stakeholders together to aid in mentoring and problem solving. This paper starts by documenting computer software packages that can enhance the teamside of a capstone. Next discussions progress into how teams can best plan their use oftechnology. Lastly, survey trends on student perceptions are presented that are correlated toobserved
to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4 an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5 an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6 an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions 7 an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate
, environmental, and economic factors 3 an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4 an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5 an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6 an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions 7 an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as
civil breadth of the PE exam has fourteen out of 40 questions relevantto construction in the areas of site development, project planning, means/ methods, andconstructions codes totaling 35% of the breadth exam. When considering further the 40questions in a concentration area, other than construction, the required knowledge in constructionaccounts for approximately 18% of the whole exam. Inclusion of topics such as ethics andprofessional practice, engineering economics, environmental regulations, materials, earthwork,and volume computations in a construction course can significantly increase the percentagesreported above. The construction topics required by the National Council of Examiners forEngineering and Surveying are listed in Table A-4 of
formative analysis.As a work in progress,, we are seeking feedback from researchers who have experience withlarge-scale, multi-year implementations, especially in the context of making revisions to researchdesign. We chose design-based methods to construct our tools and plan our implementation,having selected them for their applicability in situations where plans may need to be revisedbased on formative iterations of reflection [1]. Now that we find ourselves with the need to makechanges, we are uncertain how to effectively integrate new research questions, collect andanalyze data, and communicate findings in ways that: (1) maintain consistent attention toestablished throughlines while; (2) integrating adaptations to the original research design
various aspects of their academic and personal life to before and during the pandemic.Questions ranging from current schoolwork, to future plans and well-being are addressed. Thisinformation may inform both long-term and immediate changes that universities and instructorsmay be able to take to improve student learning outcomes and experiences within engineeringprograms.Methods An initial online survey was sent to 383 students among eight different sections of a first-year engineering course that was being conducted in a 100% remote learning environment duringthe Fall 2020 semester. The online questionnaire included a total of 10 COVID-related questions,each on a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire asks questions related to student
and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: College Students with ADHD: A Framework for Studying the Role of the College Experience on Academic SuccessAbstract Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) represent a growingfraction of the college population. We plan to study the experiences of college students withADHD majoring in science, engineering, and mathematics
. There are three cycles per semester and each cycle isof six weeks.4.2.1.1. Semester 1:Manufacturing Planning and Control:Students were introduced fundamental concepts related to manufacturing processes and control.In context of this course, the term manufacturing, and related terms of production, refers to‘making of many’. The topics covered were: introduction to manufacturing systems, MasterProduction Schedule, Material Requirement Planning, Inventory Management and Control, andIntroduction to Lean Production. The scaffolded aspects of electronics and digital fabricationwere covered through the examples (e.g., mass manufacturing of LED lights for decorationpurpose) given when discussing the manufacturing concepts. Instructors taught students
of all disciplines. The course will demonstrate, througha series of practical projects, how to assess your capabilities, find and communicate with your end-users and clients and correspondingly develop your product to fit their needs. Topics coveredinclude an overview of technology transfer, innovation models, customer discovery, lean startup,open innovation, and its implication, interview and analytical techniques, competitive intelligenceand competitive advantage, value proposition, elevator pitch, and other types of a business plan,presentation skills, and techniques.The second course (GE2030) seeks to develop in-depth knowledge and experience in prototypingby focusing on engineering processes and instrumentation that are used in
and sentiments from student responses visually, to inform a novice-led analysis toultimately help with course planning for future semesters.Keywords: COVID-19, First-Year Engineering, Machine Learning, Sentiment Analysis, AssessmentIntroductionWe consider integrating student feedback and experiences into course planning as critical, since studentsare an important stakeholder in the learning environment (Lattuca and Stark 2009). Our approach ofusing heuristic approaches through automated tools to enable faster preliminary insights from studentresponses may be a first step towards helping instructors and administrators make informed decisions fortheir courses. Amplifying students’ voices and allowing them to significantly contribute to
EngineeringIntroductionIn 2019, as part of a large research-focused grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), achemical engineering department at a large research university in the mid-Atlantic states createdan undergraduate research experience program focusing on computational polymer science. Priorto the COVID-19 pandemic, the intention of the program was to allow students from theuniversity’s multiple campuses to gain experience in research, providing them with opportunitiesthat might not be available at their home campus. The original proposal planned for students atthe various university campuses to remotely engage in research during the fall and springsemesters, while participate in in-person research at the university’s main campus during thesummer
, religion, and class). First, she shares thereview. Then, she offers this analysis: Y’all this is supposed to be an equity and inclusion track—that’s why we put this work in there. I know I am the one who wanted to present this work here, but honestly, I don’t know if we want to expose our participants’ stories to this kind of audience. Heck, I don’t know if I want to expose you to this kind of audience.The coalition jumps in and affirms the injustice and then comes up with a plan.Here, the first reveal becomes a reject.Reject: To agree in coalition that something needs to **change or be done differently** and tomake a plan.In this case, the coalition came up with a two-prong plan: (1) Reveal – Since the
program and plans to pursue further educational and career opportunities involving human-centered design, product development, and global health.Frank J. Marsik, University of Michigan Frank Marsik is the Faculty Director of First Year Student Engagement in Undergraduate Education within the University of Michigan, College of Engineering. He received his PhD from the University of Michi- gan. In addition to serving as the primary instructor for ”Engineering 110: Design Your Engineering American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #34818Experience”, he also teaches a
less concerned about personally working toimprove how computer science is taught. On the post-post-survey (n=11), a minority (36%) ofthe K-12 teachers’ responses ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ that they were concerned to improvehow to teach computer science.Figure 5Teacher responses on survey question #9: “I am concerned about working to improve how CS istaught.” Each set of 3 bars from left to right represent pre, post, and post-post survey responsesrespectively.Both question items indicate that K-12 teachers tend to be concerned, at least to some degree,about teaching computer science. Potentially because of the micro-credential PD which includedsample resources such as lesson plans, flashcards, and unplugged activities these concernsdecreased
a program uses to popularize its product, its plan will fail if the productdoes not connect with the stakeholders’ interests and needs. By creating tools to explore thescience of music, LTW connects with the children and educators' innate interest in music, andthe schools’ need for hands-on, engaging science activities. There are several other reportedexperiences connecting music with STEM. Most of them have required heavy support fromSTEM professionals [1]–[6] and consequently have not gone beyond a few implementations,whereas some others requiring less training have become more popular [7], [8]. Given theinherent interest in music on the part of both educators and students, I think it is possible toenvision a much larger and broader
practices, one goal of the published cards shouldbe transferability- could another faculty member use the documented ideas and resources at theirown institution? Unfortunately, not every card is a useful resource for adaptation. Some cardslack details or additional uploads of lesson plans, leaving readers looking for more information.Other cards lack clear indications of what the activity entails, or how much time it will take.Additionally cards can be thoroughly well documented, but may be less adaptable because theycontain too much information. As an example, many cards provide details on an entire coursethat has been modified to meet some of the entrepreneurial mindset competencies. However,unless a university plans to design a new course or