automation include use in homes, banking, laboratory environments, or buildings.Utilizing wireless technologies in automation processes can further enhance and optimize howthese systems operate [12].A fourth-year Electrical Engineering undergraduate student at YCP designed and assembled aprototype of a home automation system using wireless technology during the Spring 2020semester. The idea for the project was motivated by the student’s desire to learn more about GSMtechnology and how to apply this type of communication network to an automation or controlsystem. GSM technology is typically not a topic that is discussed in-depth in undergraduatewireless communications courses. The system operates by having the user send a command usingSmall Message
the Makerspace incompliance with state, federal, and NJIT regulations. The protocols put in place were directlyinfluenced by both the CDC guidelines [3-4] at the time of writing (August 2020), as well asNJIT’s COVID protocols for students, faculty, and staff in laboratory spaces [5]. In the creationof this protocol, the floor plan of the space and the user experience at each “station” wasconsidered. General behavioral rules were put into place for all individuals in the space that wereinformed by both CDC COVID-19 guidelines and NJIT’s COVID-19 protocols. The entirety ofthe NJIT Makerspace COVID protocol was determined via a sequential, hierarchical process,where: • The NJIT campus and laboratory-wide protocol and the CDC guidelines were
before leaving the classroom. The second group participatedin this course also in person and after the face-to-face lecture they were assigned to complete thesame worksheets online and submit them electronically in the Canvas Learning ManagementSystem. The only changed factor between the two groups was the worksheet formats. Thecomparison between the two groups is based on the average grades in learning objectivesthrough assessment measures such as exams and laboratory experiments which was kept similarfor the two groups. The assessment measures and tools are explained in detail in the next section.2. Methodology and approachIn this section we have provided information about the Digital/Microprocessor Basics(EET2141) course and introduced
structural memberssubjected to axial, shear, and bending forces, connections, as well as diaphragms and shear walls.The new projects described in this paper took place in the subsequent course where students arefurther exposed to timber design, usually during senior year, which is the ARCE 451 – Timber &Masonry Structures Design and Constructability Laboratory. Instructors for ARCE 451 arelicensed engineers with many years of industry experience who provide lectures and projectadvising. In past offerings of the course, students designed a 3-story, mixed use wood buildingduring the 10-week quarter where they: conducted a structural analysis, produced calculationsfor the structural design of the gravity and lateral force resisting systems, and
author) for the mechanical engineering program, this forced me into an unexpectedsituation. As many other engineering professors can attest, teaching laboratory intensive classesand design courses adds additional layers of complexity within the online delivery mode.The co-author who taught two other sections of senior design and the first author had toimmediately devise a plan on how to continue to deliver a meaningful design experience tostudents online in the middle of the semester. While most programs in the country adjusted theircapstone programs to face the unexpected pandemic, our program had its own set of challengesto overcome. The first concern for the authors was how to continue to provide a meaningfuldesign experience to the students
homework,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1333–1345, April 2012.[6] J. A. Holdener and B. D. Jones, “Calculus homework: A storied approach,” PRIMUS, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 21–42, May 2019.[7] L. Pogačnik and B. Cigić, "How To Motivate Students To Study before They Enter the Lab," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 1094–1098, July 2006.[8] M. Rollnick, S. Zwane, M. Staskun, S. Lotz and G. Green, “Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 23, no.10, pp. 1053-1071, Oct. 2001.[9] G. O’Brien and M. Cameron. "Prelaboratory activities to enhance the laboratory learning experience," in Proceedings of The Australian
faculty from different disciplines into small groups where each member observes aclass taught by the others and also a class taught by a separate faculty member versed in one ormore EBT approaches. Teaching assistants for STEM laboratory courses are provided trainingin EBT methods. A new program developed during COVID solicited STEM faculty to producevideos in which they illustrate one or more methods useful in online teaching.(2) Retreats: STEER facilitates departmental retreats in which faculty are guided to fine- tunetheir curricula and align departmental courses. These retreats include an introduction to EBTmethods. STEER also hosts interdisciplinary retreats, in which STEM faculty from variousdisciplines are grouped and encouraged to explore
evaluators, [that means that]communication skills and teamwork have become a much more prominent part of theengineering curriculum” (Anderson, p. 1) As we mentioned earlier, the history of liberaleducation as a part of engineering education demonstrates that the truly new dimensions ofEC2000 were not the focus on non-technical outcomes, but rather the outcomes-based approachitself and the significantly more detailed description of the professional competencies in the listof outcomes. Approximately half of the papers demonstrate a heightened awareness of theopportunities for students to practice communication in informal contexts such as communityservice projects, laboratory courses, team projects, and classrooms—but without apparentemphasis
1938, when the Japanesearmy occupied Tsinghua campus, EAA faculty and students retreated with the entire university tosouthwest China (Kunming), yet most of the laboratory equipment was left behind. When theDepartment of EEA returned to Tsinghua campus in 1946, the Electrical Engineering Buildingremained intact, yet no laboratory equipment was preserved.An option in Aeronautical Engineering was started by Professors S.C. Wang and K.L. Feng, whilethe origin of aeronautical engineering can be traced to Theodore von Kármán’s first visit toTsinghua in 1929, during which he made an unsuccessful pitch of the importance of aviationengineering to Tsinghua leadership. In 1932, aeronautical engineering was introduced to TsinghuaUniversity as a part of
University in St. Louis. She earned her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University in 2015. Her research focuses on implementation of process safety material in the chemical engineering curricu- lum, effective laboratory instruction, and active learning in core chemical engineering courses.Dr. David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is also the Director of the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs in Paducah, Kentucky, where he has taught for 22 years. His PhD and MS studies in ChE were completed at Vanderbilt University, and his BSChE at the University of Alabama. Silverstein’s research interests
educators from schools with higher needs, suchas larger number of at-risk students or higher drop-out rates. After completing safety training and receiving basic information about lithography,laboratory tools’ use and scientific background of their projects, teachers start their research asmembers of a faculty research group, mentored by a trained graduate student. At the end of theprogram, teachers are expected to prepare and present a scientific poster to summarize theirresearch and a lesson plan that will be implemented during the following school year and submittedto the website Teach Engineering [22]. The lesson plan presentation always registers highattendance from NASCENT faculty and staff, administrators and teachers from the school
University as senior lecturer in 2002. In 2012 he recieved his Ph.D. from Stellenbosch University, and in 2016 he moved to the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) as Associate Professor. At DTU, Dr. Randewijk has built up three undergraduate laboratories at DTU to aid in the teaching of electrical machine, power systems, and in the field of power system protection and substation automation. Dr. Randewijk is a senior member of the IEEE.Dr. David Navarro-Duran, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Virtual Globalization: An experience for engineering students in the Education 4.0 FrameworkAbstractIn
Georgia Tech. She also earned a M.S. in materials engineering from Auburn University and a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Mississippi State University. Prior to beginning her current position, Tammy taught science at a local high school, was an instructor in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at Spelman College, and an adjunct instructor in the Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Engineering at Georgia Perimeter College.Dr. Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute Comas Lamar Haynes is a Principal Research Engineer / faculty member of the Georgia Tech Research In- stitute and Joint Faculty Appointee at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research includes modeling steady
students gain an understanding of the different fields of engineering thatcan be studied in order to be part of the transportation workforce; that is, how other engineering fields arerelated to transportation, not only Civil Engineering.Hands-On Laboratory Experiments The goal of the hands-on laboratory and experimental sessions is to provide students with a fun,interactive learning environment in which they can discover different aspects of transportation engineering.All the hands-on sessions are designed so that the students are engaged in the session through building orconducting an experiment. A session related to building and testing a bottle rocket is one example of suchactivities. In this session (Build a Bottle Rocket), the
virtual offering.Traditionally, BME seniors took this laboratory course before senior design to gainmanufacturing skills and approval access to the university machine shop. During the ten-weekcourse, they would learn how to operate the drill press, lathe, mill, and laser cutter to machinetheir own digital microscope using manufacturing plans given to them and watching the teachingassistant (TA) perform a demonstration. However, the virtual offering requirement shifted themain deliverables from simply machining a device to developing the manufacturing plans tomachine said device. Although completing both is ideal, there is still great value in learning howto use your resources and learned machining knowledge to develop rational manufacturing
transition from thetraditional physical laboratory to the online virtual laboratory. Before the pandemic, we alreadygradually adopted more and more virtual labs. Students log in to a virtual environment,consisting of one or more virtual machines, to perform hands-on exercises. They do not need togo to an on-campus lab at a fixed time. Students can do the virtual labs at any place and at anytime. Virtualization makes it possible for students to do some labs which are otherwiseunavailable in a traditional environment. In many courses with a lab component, F2F sectionsand DE sections shared the same virtual lab environment already, making the transition fromface-to-face to online easier.As described in papers previously [3]-[4], different virtual lab
, ratherthan artifacts in which those humans were represented, as our unit of analysis.We summarized these data to share with our committee and found that though women wererepresented in the human imagery, they were used to portray non-scientific, unprofessional, orunintelligent stereotypes and in problematic contexts. Recalling two specific examples of suchgender bias, we returned to those example laboratory safety posters, took pictures, and includedthese illustrative instances of gender bias for qualitative content analysis to complement ouranalysis of the quantitized catalogue [16].These two illustrative images, along with the catalogue, formed our complete, multi-methoddataset.Data AnalysisOur data analysis process applied quantitative and
Excellence in Scholarly and Creative Activities. He was awarded numerous summer faculty fellowships with the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and the Air Force Institute of Technology - Wright Patterson Air Force Base. He is currently on sabbatical working at the US Environmental Protection Agency. He is a Princi- pal Investigator of the National Science Foundation-funded $1.5 Million grant to enhance freshman and sophomore engineering students’ learning experiences. His research is in the areas of fate and transport of organic and inorganic pollutants in the environment.Dr. Paulina Reina, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Paulina Reina is an Assistant Professor in the
laboratory experiences are less available, including extended school closuresdue to current circumstances or other uncontrollable events, such as natural disasters [7].However, the benefits of these lab kits to grade-school students could extend beyond abnormalcircumstances. They could be used to add increased variety and depth to homework assignments,allowing the educational benefits of lab science to be realized outside of the classroom and thetime and procedural restrictions of in-class labs. Drawing inspiration from the work of Pinnell etal. [8] on engineering challenges for students that utilized fixed sets of materials, the lab kitscould also be tailored to serve as a vehicle for STEM outreach that motivates students to becomemore interested
Coca-Cola Bot- tling Company Consolidated, Abbott Laboratories, and Burlington Industries. She is a national member of ATD and has twice presented at the ATD International Conference and Exposition. Dr. Hughes is a Langevin Certified Master Trainer, Harvard Management Development Fellow, and a Darden School of Business Minority Executive Education Scholar. She has a PhD in Career and Technical Education from Virginia Tech, Master of Textiles in Textile Technology Management from NC State University, B.A. in Chemistry from Clemson University, and MBA in Management from University of Arkansas.Dr. Karen A. High, Clemson University Dr. Karen High holds an academic appointment in the Engineering Science and Education
each week (lecture and labs). Some of the previous lab assignments were set-up toallow students to work together in groups of three or four on a coordinate measurement machine.Adjustments were made during the Fall 2020 semester to minimize the physical distancebetween individuals in the classroom and laboratory while also giving students the option foraccessing the classroom remotely through Zoom and the software remotely through Citrix.Students who felt uncomfortable being around other individuals were given access to themetrology lab outside of normal class hours. This paper will describe the parameters in whichfaculty at Illinois State University used to make decisions about the mode of instruction in theircourses, describe the adjustments
theimportance of power engineering education in the power engineering profession.A hands-on laboratory course is also crucial, along with a lecture-based course in power systemsengineering, as this delivery mode will better help the students to understand the smart gridconcepts. However, current curricula mostly include traditional topics for laboratory courses,such as electric power and machinery. The laboratory courses should also update along with theupdated lecture courses and cover smart grid technologies, i.e., renewable and green energyintegration, energy efficiency, energy storage. Authors in [15] propose a hands-on laboratorycourse consisting of three major components, (1) Power System Simulations performing on aminiature real-world power
Dr. Jonathan Hubler is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at Villanova University, with expertise in geotechnical engineering. His research interests include geotechnical earthquake engineering, static and dynamic response of soils in the laboratory and field, soil liquefaction, and beneficial reuse of recycled materials in geotechnical engineering. Dr. Hubler teaches a number of undergraduate and graduate courses, including Soil Mechanics, Foundation Design, and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering.Dr. Kristin M. Sample-Lord P.E., Villanova University Dr. Kristin Sample-Lord is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at
of graduate and undergraduate courses in popula- tion health such as epidemiology, environmental health, and global health. He regularly publishes articles in peer-reviewed journals with both undergraduate and graduate students and presents his research ac- tivities in national and international conferences in the US and beyond including the National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) annual conference.Dr. Rasheda Rasheda Sultana, Sam Huston State University Dr. Rasheda Sultana has been at Sam Houston State University since 2020. She teaches a unique combi- nation of classroom and laboratory-based courses and has more than 10 years of instructional experience in multiple disciplines of Health Sciences
of belonging to their program of study. While this was a known problem for theEE program, a closed-loop educational assessment and improvement was conducted to close thegap and relate students to their field of study as early as the first semester of study. In this newapproach to the lower-division courses students will start system view courses and currentprototyping circuits and tools were used to set up the laboratory experiments. The goals of thisstudy were: a) Integration of courses and providing a system view in the lower-division courses. b) Improving retention and engagement in early years of study. c) Closing the gap between lower-division and upper-division courses by practicing system view projects using
Paper ID #34076Toward a Quantitative Engagement Monitor for STEM EducationDr. Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville Aly Farag, Fellow, IEEE and IAPR: received B.S. in EE from Cairo Univ. M.S. in Bioengineering from the Ohio State and the Univ. of Michigan, and PhD in EE from Purdue. He is a Prof. of ECE at the Univ. of Louisville, and director of the Computer Vision & Image Processing Laboratory, focusing on research and teaching in computer vision, biometrics and biomedical imaging. He introduced over 13 new courses into the ECE curriculum, authored over 400 papers, edited two volumes on deformable models and a
initial finding aswell as conduct additional tests to statistically analyze the motivation and engagement throughMotivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.ReferencesAkçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054Bazarov, S. E., Kholodilin, I. Y., Nesterov, A. S., & Sokhina, A. V. (2017). Applying Augmented Reality in practical classes for engineering students. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 87, 032004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755
involve significant hands-on and/or problem-solving components. In this regard,engineering education has been profoundly impacted by the challenges associated withdelivering laboratory content and design experiences remotely. In a qualitative survey conductedby the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) to help assess the impact of thepandemic on the engineering education community [1], respondents overwhelmingly consideredthe loss of lab-based, hands-on instruction to be the leading problem faced by engineeringeducators. Approximately 120 out of 207 responses included the terms “hands-on,” “lab” or“laboratories,” or both, and another 20 mentioned “team,” referring to activities and projects. Incomparison, although lecture courses have
adjust to the distance learning mode include: a) decomposition of the course context into three modules and clear specification of the corresponding learning objectives of each module; b) combination of different technologies to create friendly and inclusive learning environment; c) frequent assessment of students' performance via online quizzes/tests; and d) carefully- designed laboratory assignments via MATLAB simulations that are able to demonstrate the entire feedback control process. A comparison of students' performance under the traditional face-to-face learning mode and the new distance learning mode is conducted. Based on assessment results, we will evaluate the effectiveness of our current teaching methodology/plan developed
learn more about producingreports that support work in a laboratory setting. Each class period begins with a brief lectureabout writing and then moves into lab work and data analysis.Using formal report and memo templates [18], students produce individual and team reports,which give them a chance to add to writing and teamwork skills. In group reports, roles arerotated so each student has experience in writing different sections and acting as the group editor.Figure 10 illustrates the type of comments they receive from the engineering instructor. 14 Figure 10. ENGR 3270 – Laboratory Report – Engineering Instructor Comments.Figure 11