4 knowledge task Relevance Applying theoretical knowledge 4 Self-control and self- Encouraging students to reflect on their learning 4 reflection and behavior Epistemological Teaching students to identify complexity and 3 understanding uncertainty related to domain-specific knowledge Teaching for understanding Helping students develop interconnected 7 knowledge and apply to tasks Supporting learning for Understanding what concepts and information is 4 understanding needed to solve
thesetechnologies. The two columns of data reflect participant group preferences. Thus, the first row(under Autonomous Robots) in Table 2, “Programming”, was among the top five selections for34% of the manufacturers and 52% of the college faculty.The plan for the data analysis was to address the five questions summarized in Table 3. The orderof the questions in the table does reflect the analysis progression through the aggregated data.Thus, the first order of events was to determine the popular skill selections for manufacturers andeducators. Once those selection percentages were reviewed, the degree of popularity by groupwas explored. After reviewing aggregated responses, the fourteen skills were grouped based ondifferences between the manufacturers’ and
multimodal approach. Each student first answeredthe questionnaire questions. These questions were targeted to get students' individual opinionsabout challenges they experience in their STEM courses, strategies to stay focused in theircourses, and steps students take to mitigate these challenges. Later, we divided these studentsinto seven focus groups comprising five groups of four students and two groups of five students.In the focus groups, students collectively reflected on their learning challenges and strategies thatworked for them. Also, students suggested the factors that influenced their decision on theirfuture in a STEM career. The students' focus group discussion were video recorded. Further, theresearchers wrote the reflection memos to
Work-in-Progress: Engaging First-Year Students in Programming 1 During COVID-19AbstractDuring the Fall 2020 semester, it became even more important than before to engage students inthe “classroom” whether that be in-person, online, or a hybrid model. This paper will introducevarious entrepreneurial mindset (EM) techniques to engage students that could be adapted to anyengineering course. All the techniques have suggestions for adapting to a fully online course aswell as working for an in-person or hybrid class. The first activity presented will be name signswith badges that will promote (1) setting, evaluating, and achieving goals, (2) self-reflection, (3)considering a problem from multiple viewpoints, and (4
rankhigher on the spectrum then they did originally. By the end of the semester both the first-yearME 110 and senior ME 465 students also increased the number of steps they had in their processand the maps went into more detail of steps using that common language previously mentioned.ConclusionsFrom the research and the data collected during that time a few conclusions can be drawn. Thefirst is that students entering the mechanical engineering department as a freshman compared towhen they prepare to leave the school after graduation their knowledge of the design process hasgrown to reflect what they have learned over their education. Another conclusion is that it isimportant to teach the steps to the design process to the students as first year
most usefulgains connected to their careers.Assessment and Evaluation Student outcomes were evaluated by analyzing results of the Undergraduate ResearchStudent Self-Assessment (URSSA) survey. As part of this program, we administered the URSSAsurvey at the end of the first semester (UIUC IRB #21284) [9]. This scale developed byUniversity of Colorado Boulder evaluates skills-based student outcomes of undergraduateresearch experiences to identify students' perceptions of gains from engaging in research. Whilethe survey response was positive, due to the small size of the current cohort (n=6 students), wechose to use the survey as a reflection tool for program organizers (faculty and staff). See belowfor reflections on the pilot program
Iowa State University. Her research interests include learning and teaching an- alytics, dashboards, online learning, self-regulation, student engagement, and reflective practices. Her current work aims to examine how instructors’ teaching strategies and methodologies may be informed and improved by interpreting data visualizations (i.e., dashboards) in both in-class and online environ- ments.Dr. Evrim Baran, Iowa State University Evrim Baran is an associate professor of educational technology in the School of Education and Human Computer Interaction at Iowa State University. She conducts research at the intersection of technology in teacher education, human-computer interaction, and learning sciences. Her research
educational technology tools in STEM classrooms in the pastfew decades. Previous studies have discussed the impact of design, development, and use ofeducational technology tools on creating an interactive learning environment for students.However, in the realm of user experience, limited studies explored the context of technology andstudents’ experiences while interacting with educational technology tools, such as students’perceived ease of use. Accordingly, this work in progress study explores reflections of students’experience while interacting with the most commonly used education technology tools inpostsecondary classrooms. For this study, we recruited thirty undergraduate STEM students fromtwo midwestern educational institutes. Our primary
decisions and critique the accuracy of the information. Students who evaluate well can provide reflections on approaches taken to solve a problem and demonstrate their ability to assess underlying concepts in the process of choosing the best among multiple alternative solutions. ● Create: putting elements together to produce a new pattern or original work. In engineering, the previous levels of the taxonomy culminate to the design of a component or system that invokes all previous levels of the taxonomy. Such efforts to create are often stimulated in capstone design classes but can also be invoked in smaller projects in lower- level courses.Promoting the integration, design, and evaluation capabilities of students is
, however, does not challenge the student to make decisions on prospective team members.The algorithmic team formation method was not utilized in Georgia Tech’s capstone designcourses considered for this research, enabling students to reflect and learn from the decisionsthey made during their team formation process.The team formation and project selection methodology utilized here is built upon the foundationof prior research documented in [12]. The researchers describe a system with a high level ofstudent autonomy in which project interests and skills of other students are available to them. ahigh level of success in their workflow with a vast majority of students receiving projects whichthey prioritized. This document differs in that the project
Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Investigating professional shame as experienced by engineering
learning pedagogy, and assessment through collaborativelearning sessions and 3) scaffolding learning moments to build up to a culminating courseexperience. In the following sections, each of these strategies corresponding to the course designconsiderations are described, as well as my instructor reflection on student feedback.Table 1Translation and Reframing of Course Design Considerations for Implementation in an Open-ended Course Design Context Course Design Core Idea and Reframed Approach Strategy for Considerations Approach to Expand Thinking Implementation Focus on learning Focus on being and Journey mapping for objectives to address
]. In engineering design education, analyzing variouspedagogical approaches to combine teamwork experience with reflective activities indicates thatengineering students can make a connection between effective teamwork and key engineering designabilities such as open-mindedness, innovation, and communication [4]. In a similar research setting,study suggests that first-year engineering students gradually become more effective team membersduring a semester and compared to reflections, their teamwork behaviors are the better predictor oftheir academic performance [5]. – 1 of 9 – Teamwork is integrated into teaching to a varying extent in engineering schools. Many universitieshave developed
,with the goal of overcoming the previously noted challenges through innovative pedagogicalmethods and exposing students to the benefits of engaging in such an interdisciplinarycurriculum. To be able to implement such as curricular, it is also crucial to provide a robustprofessional learning training for teachers. In the next sections, we provide information about theonline PL and teachers’ experiences with the activities.Online Teacher Professional LearningExperiential learning in teacher professional development is not a new approach but its focus ondeveloping teachers’ practice by experimenting, reflecting and adapting new theories, practicesand content they have been introduced to in their own professional context [11] has been
teacher. Pseudonyms areused throughout this paper.Preliminary Results:Data collection continues, particularly through Canvas (LMS), in teacher reflection and futurefocus groups. We expect more data to emerge as we progress through the year.From our initial findings, the main themes that emerged from teacher interviews wereadaptations (communication with students), student motivation (grades and student engagement),digital equity (laptops and internet access), successes (alternate projects) and teacher futureplans.Grading proved challenging for many of the teachers in terms of student motivation. Jack, ane4usa teacher, expressed "In Pennsylvania here, our governor, sort of in part of the decree saidthat no student could fail, on account of the
criteria and process reflected severaldifferent communities’ aspirations for the “engineer of the 21st century.” Next, we introduce ourmethodology for analyzing the papers published in the ASEE proceedings as a way to study howthe engineering education community has thought about communication over the past 20 years.After identifying trends and themes in each of the 3 years analyzed in this study, we sketch apreliminary history of engineering communication pedagogy and research in ASEE from 2000-2020. In brief, our initial findings suggest that (1) interest in engineering communication grewin tandem with the implementation of EC2000; (2) momentum built gradually between 2000 and2010 and more rapidly between 2010 and 2020; (3) meaningful
, service, and career advancement) and provideholistic faculty support in areas such as time management, work-life topics, and well-being [1].From the context of the CTL, the intentional alignment of programs, in which the relationshipsbetween goals and activities of different faculty development programs are considered, helps toidentify strategic approaches to advancing the CTL’s goals. At the same time, from the contextof faculty members, participating in exercises that encourage the consideration of an issue fromboth big picture and granular perspectives and the connections between the factors that impactthe issue can help foster reflection and make visible the role of faculty members in the issue.The objectives of this paper are to 1) present a
research has documented the relationship between the efficacy of internships in constructionor engineering (Laxman et al. 2005 and Moore and Plugge 2008). However, little research has focusedon the relationship between the availability of paid internships and the economy. There is plenty ofresearch available on job rates and the economy in general (BLS 2020), however there is no researchpublished that reflects the relationship between internships and the economy. In the past recession, jobloss has caused some employed to return to university as non-traditional students (Barr and Turner2013). It is not yet known if that same non-traditional population will return to university while courseshave shifted to an online format. Perceptions of student
perspectives ofDEI, the team designed the research activities to isolate those factors in the questionnaire andinterviews.MethodsThe project is a sequential mixed methods study combining quantitative and qualitative aspects toexamine connections between involvement in HEP, professional formation, and views of DEI. Thequantitative aspect of this project will be a questionnaire which will guide the development of theinterviews for the qualitative aspect. Current engineering students at Lipscomb as well as alumniof the engineering program will be asked to participate in the questionnaire and interviews.Students will reflect an immediate impact on DEI from a pre/post-questionnaire due toinvolvement in HEP whereas alumni will represent the long-term
may have a difficult time adapting to highlysocial university, local community, or governmental service organizations. The authors reflect onhow their time as graduate student leaders, in student government, student organizations, andcampus committees, influenced their ability to maximize impact while efficiently balancing timespent. The authors’ service portfolios span a range of fields – as student organization advisors,committee members, or advisory board members – in diverse types of institutions (from researchuniversities to undergraduate teaching colleges) and have each balanced their personal andprofessional goals with their commitments. While not all junior faculty may have comparablegraduate student leadership backgrounds, the
allowedstudents to reflect on experimentation and interpretation of results. Future work will explorecurriculum planning and design at the departmental level to continuously improve technicalwriting for civil engineering undergraduate students from their first-year courses to their seniorcapstone design projects.IntroductionCompetent technical writing is an essential communication skill for civil engineering students toimprove in undergraduate programs. Engineering students with strong technical writing skills arecompetitive in engineering job searches and career promotion [1]. Engineering educators haverecognized the importance of technical writing for decades and various approaches have beenimplemented to redesign the writing curriculum and improve
parenthesesThe survey also included an open-ended question for both cohorts: Share your thoughts and reflections about your experiences collaborating with the faculty advisor (e.g., mentorship experience), and your overall experience conducting researchIV. RESULTSCohort 1 ResultsThe questions administered on the survey (Table 2) were intended to inquire about developingrelationships, commitment to mentorship, genuine desire for mentee to succeed, and willingnessof the faculty member to disseminate personal and academic wisdom.Table 2. Student Response Percentages: Cohort 1 Question N Yes No Prior to joining the group, did you engage in research
institutions. course DataFest[12] using on the data source and have immediate multiple datasets of variety domain expert support applications fields; availability. Temple: multiple climate datasets[13]The proposed approachTo address the above-mentioned limitations, we propose to develop data-enabled engineeringproject (DEEP) modules guided by the latest research on experiential learning theory (ELT).Experiential learning (EL) is the process of learning through experience, and is more specificallydefined as “learning through reflection on doing”[15], [16]. Kolb helped to develop the moderntheory of experiential learning, which focuses on the learning
how students iterativelyconstruct and “manipulate” theoretical objects in pursuit of scientific models with the ways theyconstruct and manipulate physical objects – particularly with respect to tinkering.The course contextIn the iteration of the course described here, students are undergraduate preservice science andengineering teachers in a UTeach replication site. The semester began with the question: ”is everycolor in the rainbow?” Students are provided with a range of materials - colored gels, printer inks, 3Figure 1: Source wavelengths (left), reflected wavelengths (red and blue), and perception (twocones, indicating magenta.flashlights, and markers; we also have the science education
thecompanyStudents are asked multiple questions corresponding to each of the seven areas above. Theiranswers to these questions show the level of intrapreneurial competencies.Intrapreneurial Motivation Scale Survey (IMSS)The IMSS includes questions designed to get at intrapreneurial motivation. This is a 12-questionset designed to get at various levels of motivation.Cohort 1It is important to note that the data reflected for Cohort 1 in this paper shows data collection forthe first components of TIP. Not all data tools were used (for example, interviews) because, atthis time, not all of the components of TIP have been experienced by the students.Students are given multiple experiences, in each course, to develop intrapreneurial dispositionsand competencies
usingWeBWorK prelab problems to support students’ learning. Specifically, our study seeks toaddress the question: What is the impact of the WeBWorK prelab problem sets on students’preparedness for lab sessions, students’ learning and students’ engagement during labsessions?(Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was moved entirely online and the format andthe structure of the original lab sessions implemented were affected. Although the shifts inthe format and structure may not fully reflect the usual state of the original lab sessions andthe corresponding observations, the study was carried out mostly as planned.)Utilizing Online Homework SystemsOne of the key advantages of online homework systems is that students can receiveimmediate feedback
. Unfortunately,engineering educators generally find it difficult to foster critical thinking among their students.This work-in-progress paper describes a strategy to inculcate critical thinking ability inengineering graduates. Examples are taken from two core courses in the Materials andManufacturing stream.Several critical thinking models were explored, such as Gibbs’ reflective cycle model, Facione’smodel, Kronholm model, and King and Kitchener’s model. Paul and Elder’s (P-E) model forcritical thinking was found to be more suited for engineering. P-E model provides a good basisfor the way in which engineers think, and is especially suited for CT as it targets issues such ascreativity, design development, and professional and ethical issues. Learning
free space and wave velocity 7 Wave Equation and Induced EMF Wave propagation in material Solutions medium 8 Wave Solutions in Visualization of magnetic Damped wave in conducting Conducting Media fields media Module 3: Transmission Line Theory 9 Wave polarization and Wave reflection due to Reflections impedance mismatch 10 Transient Response and Transmission line reflection Transient time domain Bounce Diagram
both in-person and remote modalities. While it was expected that students would miss out on the planttour aspect of industry visits, a surprising observation was that the PI noticed the drive to andfrom each site had been an opportunity to get to know the students and discuss what they hadlearned. This organic conversation was hard to replicate in an online environment. On thepositive side, geography no longer limited which sites and companies participated in industryvisits. Further, the virtual format pushed the focus of the “visit” from specifics of productionprocesses towards more personal reflections of the speaker’s career trajectory in engineering.This was especially relevant as many of the speakers were Louisiana Tech alumni. We
researchers newto EER.EER PERT Project Goals Building on the JEE Mentored Reviewer Program, the broader EER PERT project seeksto develop peer review training for EER scholars and conduct research on how individualsdevelop mental models of the review process. The research goals of the project entail addressingthe following research questions: ● How do scholars develop schema for quality EER through collaboratively constructing peer reviews? ● How do reviewing skills in EER improve research skills?While we have already gained insights through the experiences and reflections from previousparticipants in the JEE Mentored Reviewer Program, we are exploring these questions moredeeply by including a research component. A later phase of