model ofonline education.Roy and Sykes also raise a question of whether the benefits in terms of skills development maydiffer for a virtual internship for in-person students versus online students. We do not know theextent to which prior preparation in self-regulated learning would favor online students’ successin virtual internships. An international survey of 158 people who had completed a virtualinternship between 2011 and 2015 found that the majority reported gaining interpersonal andcommunication skills as well as skills relevant to their career development and strategic thinking,supporting the hypothesis that virtual interns gain skills similarly to traditional interns [39].Bayerlein and Jeske have also explored the extent to which
instructions compared to the 2019 in-person bootcamp was thatthe students who were not willing to reach out to the faculty or the student assistant for help,would get stuck for a while which also resulted in less engagement. In an in-person bootcamp,supervision and identifying the students that needed additional help was significantly easier.Therefore, the number of students who could complete this part of the project was lower than lastyear. A solution to this issue could be creating groups of two students similar to the in-personbootcamp, asking students to work with each other, and joining their Zoom breakout roomsevery 15-20 minutes to see their progress. On the third day, students designed a path for their robots to follow and developed the
: Word cloud visualization of the college-level challenges faced by the participantsIn addition to a word frequency query, a coding analysis was performed on the responses toquestion M1 from the matching survey to distill this qualitative information. In doing so, fourinductive codes were generated by the researcher while reading and sorting the data: academics,path uncertainty, personal and social struggles, and time balance. The “academics” code wasused to label any struggles related to coursework, such as low grades, dropping courses, or poorstudy habits. The “path uncertainty” code broadly labels any lack of clarity in students’ academicor career trajectory in engineering, such as being unsure about their major or having troublefinding an
positive effect on studentlearning. In 5 of the 14 learning outcomes assessed, the effect of HOLD was equal to or greaterthan the effect of attending lecture and had a compensatory effect, allowing similar learning tothe average in-person, pre-pandemic learning environment.IntroductionActive learning in higher education has been shown to support the growth of transferable skillsthat are increasingly necessary in the rapidly evolving workforce [1]. Active learningmethodologies help develop skills needed by graduates in the 21st century including criticalthinking, problem solving, and life and career skills such as collaboration [2]. Firsthand learningexperiences, including hands-on learning, helps students figure things out for themselves
- tors of in-person, online, and hybrid format classes. Melissa continues to serve as a teaching consultant with CTL and focuses on projects relating to equity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Revolutionizing Grading: Implications on Power, Agency, and EquityAbstractEven as we integrate inclusive teaching strategies and course design, the philosophy andimplementation of grading continues to be a large source of inequity in higher education. Gradessignal to students whether they belong within a course or degree major and dictate access toacademic and career opportunities. Consequently, even in a classroom
sharing their thoughts.3.0 Departmental DEI CommitteeThe CEE Department instituted a DEI Committee in the summer of 2020 to develop a strategicplan for DEI. In addition to faculty and staff who typically comprise departmental committees,graduate and undergraduate students were asked to join the committee so that all communitymembers are represented. Volunteers from each of the community groups were sought to ensurethat committee members were deeply committed to and interested in the cause. Since creation,the committee has been meeting on a weekly basis to develop the strategic plan, discuss ideas forimproving DEI in the community, and plan events and other actions to promote DEI.The goal of the DEI strategic plan is to create a diverse, equitable
[7]. TheCommunity of Inquiry Framework [11] uses social constructivism to outline three importantcomponents within online courses that contribute to student development and learning: socialpresence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence. Social presence can be defined by theability for group members to project themselves socially and emotionally, as “real” people (i.e.,their full personality) [11]. Cognitive presence is the act of constructing meaning throughsustained communication and is often developed through significant social presence [11]. Thethird component is teaching presence, which is how instructors design educational experiences tofacilitate social and cognitive presence [11]. These theories framed our methods and
individual consultations to faculty on areas related to their own teaching and to student learning. Prior to her current role, she has applied her interests in a STEM learning environment and taught a variety of psychology courses to both undergraduate and graduate students in face-to-face, hybrid, and online formats. Shannon earned a BS in psychology, a MA in experimental psychology, and a Ph.D. in curriculum & instruction with a focus in higher education.Dr. Scott A. Sell, Saint Louis University Scott A. Sell, Ph.D. is currently an Associate Professor and the Biomedical Engineering Program Coor- dinator in Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology at Saint Louis University. Prior to joining
between gender groups.There are two parts of this study: an online survey and an interview. Engineering undergraduatesare recruited for participation, and questions are designed to gage students’ 3D printing experience,frequency, and habits, including the intended use of printed items. Students are also asked toidentify their response to printing failures, along with their use of in-person and online resourcesfor troubleshooting. Student demographics are also recorded. In interviews, participants are askedin detail about each item in their online print history. Survey results are paired with in-personinterview responses.Research results will inform future work in addressing barriers that affect students, including 3Dprinting training, makerspace
of People and Culture at Hopelab). Over 150people attended our MMW conference via Zoom. The panels of judges, BC faculty, staff, andparents, and students provided enthusiastic feedback about the event. While it would have beenfabulous to hold this conference in person, we acknowledge that the remote environment didallow for family members and friends outside of Boston to fully participate.Experimenting with reflection. Weekly evening reflection sessions provided students anopportunity to integrate course content into peer-led discussions about their own moral andethical development. We developed a curriculum that translates Ignatian reflection activities (e.g.the Examen) to a Zoom format. We also adopted BC’s innovative PODs (Purposeful
conducting lab experiments with materials sent directly to their homes, somecompleting their experience fully online, and some completing portions of lab work in person oncampus. Each teacher developed an engineering lesson plan based on the corresponding center’sresearch to be implemented either in person or virtually during the 2020-2021 academic schoolyear. Research posters, created with support from graduate student and faculty mentors, werepresented to industry partners, education partners, center members, and the NSF. Support for theteachers as they implement lessons, present posters, and disseminate their developed curricula,has continued throughout the year. Common survey and interview/focus group protocols,previously designed specifically
' personal information was encrypted or removedfrom public view, without data distortion [23].Responses obtained from these instruments were compiled in electronic spreadsheets andanalyzed using Excel statistical modules. Variables such as response mode and frequency wereconsidered within the questions. The decision to work with descriptive statistics was based onthe objective of characterizing the general response of the students to the innovation proposal. Ifit is positive, as expected, incorporation is planned in an experimental study to determine theimpact on student performance.Data analysis and resultsStudent Satisfaction with Educational PodcastsAll 53 students in the course were asked to participate in the poll, 46 answering the
knowledge and meaning-making that results in career-ready students preparedand committed to apply whole-system thinking to solve local and global problems” (2017, p.xvi).Problem-based learning (PBL) is an alternative to traditional learning environments involvingprimarily lecture delivery (Yildririm, Baur, LaBoube, 2014). PBL features hands on learningwith the goal of longer retention of the desired learning outcomes. PBL activities candemonstrate increased performance compared to a traditional classroom setting. Barlow statesthat soft skills typically not learned through passive learning are developed and honed throughPBL (2011).Spiral learning (SL) adds to the value of PBL by introducing concepts at various points. Veladat& Mohammadi list the
students to explore potential options for the capstone project, and to have theopportunity to get a good starting point for it, ahead of the capstone semester. In this paper, thesenior level courses specific to communication systems area of concentration within an electricalengineering technology program are discussed, their course content and the term projectsincluded, and how they offer venues to capstone project choices. The paper presents specificexamples of how these course projects gave students successful pathways for capstone projects.The course content that can be covered by the curriculum of an undergraduate technologyprogram is somehow limited, especially for a broad field such as communication systems, andbeyond the fundamental
student learningthrough practice of freehand sketching in perspective.While many educational drawing tools have been explored with great potential to improve drawingself-efficacy, few studies have tried to measure student’s self-efficacy in their drawing ability in atruly comprehensive and quantitative manner that can be replicated in other studies.MethodsA. Instrument DevelopmentAccording to Fabrigar, the soundness of the items that are included in an instrument have an im-portant role in utilizing the results obtained from Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) [29]. TheDrawing Self Efficacy Instrument (DSEI) consists of 13 items that addresses four areas of Draw-ing efficacy. The DSEI was reviewed by an experienced designer and drawing instructor
in the 21st century is one of the primary goals ofuniversity educators [1-5]. Enabling students to practice self-learning, to find solutions to designproblems that are sustainable, helping them recognizing that they are part of community are justa few of our educational goals. Energy and power engineering education has undergonesignificant changes over the last decades, together with an increased student interests into suchengineering programs. The issues surrounding this theme are also receiving significant interestsform faculty and quite often administration. Today electrical energy industry professionals arerequired to have significant techno-scientific capabilities, deep interdisciplinary understandings,and soft engineering skills, such
identities, social locations, and values are relevant to thiswork.First author (RSK) is an early-career contingent faculty member at Smith College, a privateliberal arts women’s college with one engineering degree program. They are a white-passing transperson of Chinese and European descent who lives and works on unceded Nipmuc and Pocumtucterritory. They approach this paper from the perspective of a new engineering educator whoseformal training is in mechanical engineering and who aspires to teach towards principles ofcollective liberation from systems of oppression and domination.Second author (JSR) approached this research from the perspective of an engineering educatorwho places a premium on interdisciplinarity and inclusion. She has taught
me an insight into successful business practices. With this, I could identify companies where I could do a grounds tour of a factory site to see some of these practices in person or interview a current Sales Engineer to hear more about how they use this information in their line of work.”In summary, students were able to recognize and communicate how to extend their knowledgeaccess in the future by building a supportive environment. Given that only about 1/3 of the studentresponses provided specific examples, moving forward, updates will be made to the metacognitivereflection prompts and/or time will be afforded with the lecture to provide students with greaterstructure and practice in identifying specific examples (which