elective(s) in unit operations could be Table 1: Suggested Traditional Chemical Engineering Curriculum Required Subjects Basic Sciences basic skills/freshman class math material and energy balances chemistry thermodynamics physics fluid mechanics biology heat transfer mass transfer/separations Possible Electives transport phenomena§ safety reaction engineering biochemical engineering control materials/polymers unit operations laboratory class(es
electrical engineering. The students learned skills inteam building, project management, communication skills, and budgeting. The outcome of thisproject was a fully functional probe station currently used in the solid-state laboratory.1. IntroductionAll engineering students in School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University (GVSU) arerequired to take a multidisciplinary two-course capstone design sequence during their senioryear. The two courses are structured to provide all students with a real-world understanding ofthe practice and principles of engineering and project management. The first course, EGR485 -Senior Engineering Project I, focuses on topics directly related to project management ofindustry projects including teambuilding
all components of acommunication system using a systems approach to the subject manner. The lecture content ofthe course details the blocks that make of the communication system, while the laboratory part ofthe course allow the hands-on design, building and testing of those block. The system is asuperheterodyne receiver that constitutes 95% of receivers used worldwide, including broadcastradio, broadcast TV, cell phone communication systems, wireless LANs and satellitecommunications. A block diagram is shown in figure 1. RF PCB IF PCB Audio Amp Mixer RF IF
level students, the majority of them had taken at leasttwo courses in Purdue’s CGT Minor curriculum, Solid Modeling and Surface Modeling, whichprovided the necessary CAD skills. As the ergonomics module was the last one taught in theelective course, the students already had basic knowledge of design verification and processplanning. Students met for two one-hour lectures and one two-hour laboratory section every week;and to work on assignments and projects, some students also met outside of class.Design rationaleSince the principles of ergonomics can be very abstract and conceptual, it is not easy to teachthose principles in a regular lecture-based environment7, and the lack of hands-on experiencesdoes not grant students opportunities for solid
2006-2500: PREPARING FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES: A GRASS-ROOTSAPPROACH TO ENHANCING K-12 EDUCATIONKenneth Hunter, Tennessee Technological University Kenneth Hunter is currently Associate Professor of Basic Engineering at Tennessee Technological University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Tennessee Technological University. He has over 30 years of engineering experience, including positions in academia, industry, the United States Army, a government laboratory, and his own consulting business. He is a licensed P.E. in the State of Tennessee.Jessica Matson, Tennessee Technological University Jessica Matson is currently Professor and Chair of the Industrial and
. Page 11.974.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Open Source Software and Live Linux CDs: Elements of Successful Lab ModulesIntroductionIn addition to the intellectual effort, hands-on lab development can require substantial budget,labor, and laboratory resources. Often, commercial software can require a significant budgetcommitment. At the same time, system configuration and software installation can also require asignificant labor commitment. In many colleges, incorporating laboratory activities into a classnecessitates the dedication of a physical room to a single course section. In many environments,obtaining the necessary budget, labor, and room resources for hands-on lab modules
ScienceFoundation grant (Grant # ESI-9254358) from the Division of Elementary, Secondary, andInformal Education. The genesis of this concept was a conversation amongst chemicalengineering faculty members on what influenced them to major in engineering. Almostuniformly the conclusion was that it was an influential teacher (usually in math or science) thatgot them started. While the influence of this teacher led to an interest in science, how thisultimately resulted in majoring in engineering was never as clear cut. To eliminate thisuncertainty we submitted a proposal to bring math or science teachers to the WSU campus for asummer to work along side engineers in their research laboratories to get a clear idea of whatengineers do. The teachers, in addition to
received his Ph.D. in Reproductive Biology, his MS in Reproductive Physiology, and his BS in Animal Science all from Texas A&M. Dr. Day is the Director of the Equine Reproduction Laboratory at MTSU. Page 11.422.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Designing, Building, and Testing a Closed Compartment Stage Incubator, CCSII. IntroductionThe current paper describes the design, construction, and testing of a Closed Compartment StageIncubator, CCSI. The CCSI was created in order to enable scientists in the Horse ScienceLaboratory at Middle Tennessee State University, MTSU, to monitor the growth of
is, the degreesoffered by Thai Cyber University will be students’s second (or later) degrees. The program isdesigned in this fashion in recognition of our inability to provide fundamental laboratory courses,such as Physics or Chemistry. Students will have had taken these classes in conventional system Page 11.526.9prior to enrolling with Thai Cyber University.The learning in the program will be monitored through a learning management system to ensurequality of the education. Group discussions will be held through the internet webboard. Someprograms of study will employ local tutors, who can help students and act as contact pointsbetween
Page 11.719.2and finding solutions to these problems using our knowledge and information.In order to provide the students with an education designed to meet the needs of the time,KIT has promoted educational reforms and established a new curriculum including theengineering experiment course of the FLE I, II and III. This paper introduces thecurriculum, guidelines, examples of themes / problems that students have actually tackled,advantages of a large class and how to organize a large class.2. Contents of Fundamental Lab for Engineering Courses2.1 Objectives of the CoursesThe FLE I, II and III are mandatory laboratory courses for all 1st and 2nd-yearundergraduate students.The main objective of the courses is to train students in fundamental
January 06 (Spring 06) 4 49It may be noted that the development and offering of the Nuclear Engineering Technologycourses are based on the prioritization of the student needs with in the context of ExcelsiorCollege trnasfer credit policy and procedures. In future, more online courses will be added to Page 11.447.3allow students to meet their needs.A strong laboratory component is part of the Nuclear Engineering Technology programcurriculum; however, there are no laboratory courses available at Excelsior at this time. Almostall of the students enrolled in this program are able to transfer the required laboratory
communication technologies to the delivery ofcourse content and materials. Engineering schools can develop synergistic and complementarypartnerships with engineering programs in developing countries. Three of their partnerships aredescribed below.In 2002 Purdue University, Kabul University, Kabul Polytechnic and Kabul EducationUniversity were awarded a grant to establish a rapid training program at the universities in Kabulin order to generate an immediate flow of skilled workers and trainers into Afghanistan’srebuilding effort, with a focus on agriculture, education, engineering, and technology. Thepartners targeted their efforts on training in the use of distance learning (DL), and establishingfour DL laboratories at three universities in Kabul. Four
2006-1905: TEACHING ROBOT DESIGN: STUDENT-DRIVEN, OPEN-ENDEDDESIGN PROJECTSBradley Bishop, U.S. Naval Academy BRADLEY E. BISHOP is an Associate Professor in the Weapons and Systems Engineering Department at the United States Naval Academy (USNA). He received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State University in 1991, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in EE from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1994 and 1997, respectively. He is the founder of the Mobile Robotics Laboratory at USNA. His research interests include robot swarm control, autonomous surface vessels, and nonlinear control.Carl Wick, U.S. Naval Academy CARL E. WICK is a Professor and
. Page 11.239.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Assessing Student Comprehension in a Windows 2003 Server Project Through the Use of a PortfolioAbstractLike many subjects, the teaching of Windows 2003 server can be filled with rich detail andinformation that can be quickly lost by the student without proper reinforcement. In the past,hands-on instruction of computer servers has been done with step-by-step laboratories. Theselaboratories act as a “cookbook” for the student as they process each step of the recipe. Studentsusing these “cookbook” methods concentrate more on completing the required steps thanactually synthesizing the learned information. This paper discusses the use of portfolios in aWindows
: anadventure. Analysis of this genre summons the talents of literature faculty. Here we drawupon English professor Thomas Foster and his intriguing book How to Read LiteratureLike a Professor4, and its more enticing subtitle “ A Lively and Entertaining Guide toReading Between the Lines.” His opening salvo, “Every trip is a quest”, argues that eachadventure story posses five characteristics: A quester A place to go A state reason to go there Challenges and trials en route, and A real reason to go there. In the context of teaching technological literacy, the quester is the instructor whosets out to construct and teach such a course, the place to go (physically) is the lecturehall and laboratory and (intellectually
at the University of Utah. Current research interests include communication in nonprofit organizations, social support, communication across the curriculum, speaking and writing in the disciplines, and interdisciplinary collaboration.Bryan Stenquist, University of Utah Bryan Stenquist received his BSEE degree from the university of Utah in 2005 and is currently a Research Engineer at the University of Utah in charge of implementing hands-on project-based laboratories across the ECE curriculum. Page 11.777.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Integrated System-Level Design
, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsSoph. ME 201 – ThermodynamicsYear Student communication survey, refresher for past grammatical expertise Tools: MS Word, Email, WWWJunior ME 332 – Fluid Mechanics ME 371 – Machine Design IYear Laboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4- Short Technical Reporting 6 pages each) Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4-6 pp. + App., Brief narrative of procedure, Individual); Technical Analysis, Economic measured data, deduced and analyzed Analysis, Recommendation for Action data, plotted results with discussion Tools: EES,Powerpoint and
necessary aspects of ship design during one course. Significantdevelopment and application of NA&ME fundamentals must therefore occur in the concurrentPrinciples of Ship Design (PSD), Ship Structures (SS), and Ship Propulsion Design (SPD)courses (see table below for description of course formats). It is within the framework of thesethree classes that the semester-long ship design is carried out in a laboratory setting by designteams composed of 4 cadets, all of whom are enrolled in these same 3 courses. Course Lecture Hours/Week Lab Hours/Week Principles of Ship Design 3 3 (PSD) Ship Propulsion Design 3 0
comparative assessment of the effectiveness of this approach compared to the previousyear’s offering of Sophomore Engineering Clinic.IntroductionThe Sophomore Clinic is a four semester-hour course team taught by the College ofCommunication and the College of Engineering. Typically, the course has approximately 120students divided into six sections. The faculty team consists of two or three instructors from theCollege of Communication and five from the College of Engineering, with each of the fourRowan engineering disciplines (Chemical, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical) represented. Studentshave two 75-minute lecture sessions and one 160-minute laboratory session each week.During the lecture sections students receive instruction on technical
studies the wide variety of technology used in everyday life. Modernsociety would not exist without the aid of technology. We depend upon technologicaldevices for communication, food production, transportation, health care and evenentertainment. The course objectives are to develop a familiarity with how varioustechnological devices work and to understand the scientific principles underlying theiroperation. Topics covered include the automobile, radio, television, CD players,microwave ovens, computers, ultrasound, and x-ray imaging. Concepts from basicscience are introduced as they appear in the context of technology. Laboratory projectsinclude construction of simple objects such as radios, electric motors, and a musicalkeyboard. Since its
2006-1676: CAPSTONE DESIGN, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PROJECT ORPERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE?Richard Goff, Virginia Tech RICHARD M. GOFF Richard Goff is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of the Department of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is also the Director of the Frith Freshman Engineering Design Laboratory and the Faculty Advisor of the VT Mini-Baja Team. He is actively involved in bringing joy and adventure to the educational process and is the recipient of numerous University teaching awards.Janis Terpenny, Virginia Tech JANIS P. TERPENNY Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering
. Page 11.1072.5 Reductionism is generally the accepted approach for attaining a Ph.D. in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. While extending one’s specialized (Ph.D. level) knowledge to a broader problem can provide new and nontraditional approaches, it is more likely to not lead to a successful result. The same applies at the departmental level. At USU the name change required bringing in new faculty with specialization in chemical engineering, bioengineering, Materials Science, and analytical chemistry to complement the old guard rooted in traditional Agriculture and Irrigation Engineering. The breadth of faculty knowledge extends beyond the walls of the classroom or teaching laboratory into faculty
tocontemporary problems and technology solutions than strictly didactic instruction orcontrived laboratory problem approaches. Not surprising, students’ motivation increasesin these settings and their confidence in problem definition, option development andsolution grows. As with active learning approaches, the instructor role changes in clinicand project courses from one of talking head to facilitator, guide and resource [2,6]. Thestructure of an engineering clinic based ECE program is one that requires students tooperate at higher orders of abstraction earlier in their education while still requiring aconcrete “hands-on, minds-on” engineering solution to the real world problem at hand.These transformative changes are discussed as desirable in most of
courses teaching wireless data acquisition.References1. E. Cheever, L. Molter, B. Maxwell, “A Remote Wireless Sensing and Control Laboratory,” CD- ROM Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3432, June 22-25, 2003 Nashville, Tennessee.2. J. Gumaer, “Teaching Data Acquisition Using Laptop Computers,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Session1426, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah.3. M. Hoffmann, “Improving Data Acquisition and Reduction in a First-Year Student Laboratory Experiment,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3559, June 12- 15, 2005, Portland, Oregon.4. A. See, “Utilizing LabVIEW for Data Acquisition and Analysis for a 13 Weeks
showed that a significant percentage of students (96 %) were actively engaged inteaching and learning, and found the class stimulating. felt that the laboratory complimented wellwith the courses. The comments (Table 3) clearly showed that the students perceived the classpositively. The students found the class to be challenging and liked the teaching style.Table 2. Student Evaluations (68 students over four courses). Student Scores (68 students) Question 1 5 2 3 4 (poor
2006-260: TAKING MATERIALS LECTURES BEYOND POWERPOINTBarry Dupen, Indiana University Purdue University-Fort Wayne (ET) Dr. Dupen earned his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Metallurgy, all at the University of Connecticut. After working for nine years in the automotive industry as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and materials laboratory manager, he joined Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW) as an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology. His primary interests lie in materials engineering, mechanics, and engineering technology education
polymer waveguide fabrication system, depicted in Figure 6, isbuilt in the Advanced Optics and Sensors Laboratory at the Department of EngineeringTechnology. The fabrication system consists of following major components: the laser source - a6 mW, 375 nm wavelength laser diode module; a beam shutter that is placed on the optical pathto temporally block the laser beam during the writing break; the mirror which is used to directthe laser traveling direction; the beam expander and 10x objective lens for beam focusing, andthe XY precision stage which is capable of operating at mechanical resolutions of 10nm andrepeatabilities of ±100nm. The translation stage’s movement and the beam shutter’ operation areprogramming controlled using LabView software
Carbide Laboratory, and the High Voltage Laboratory. Page 11.1337.3Participant SelectionTo attend WISE Women, participants must have completed the ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade.A total of 30 girls are selected to attend. They must fill out an application that includes math andscience activities, grade point average, ACT score, transcripts, teacher recommendations, and anessay. Most participants are from Mississippi, although there have been a few from other statesin the region. Some participants know very little about engineering, while others know whatengineering is in general, but not about the specific disciplines.To advertise the program
classoffered twice per week for 3 hours. It was a combined lecture and “hands-on” experience for thestudents allowing access to classroom, field and/or laboratory facilities as necessary. Initialenrollment was 14 students. Biology and Chemistry Applications for Engineers presented students withfundamental biology and chemistry concepts in the context of engineering and scienceapplications. Based on the expertise of the two faculty teaching the course (achemical/environmental engineer and a biologist and wetland ecologist), the class focused on thestudy of a freshwater aquatic microcosm. Based on the expertise of the faculty, this courseoffering was focused in civil/environmental engineering. Skills developed in the class areappropriate for the
Chemistry I 4 General Chemistry II 3General Chemistry I Laboratory 1 General Chemistry II Laboratory 1Calculus I for Physical Sciences 4 Calculus II for Physical Sciences 4Physics I for Engineers 5 Physics II for Engineers 5College Composition 3 Public Speaking 3Second YearCalculus III for Physical Scientists 4 Ordinary Differential Equations 4Engineering Mechanics – Statics 3 Engineering Mechanics – Dynamics 3Social Problems 3 Current World Problems 3Principles of Plant Biology 4 Principles of Microeconomics