, and tools for integrating probabilistic forecasts with other data sets.Many other industries, groups, and individuals use weather information. For example, theconstruction industry uses weather information to schedule specific activities and to purchasematerials. K-12 teachers use weather data to develop math and engineering skills in theirstudents, which is essential for the future [4, 5, 6]. Following the classic Boyer Report, it is very important that no gap exists between teachingand research [7]. In addition, faculty members who creatively combine teaching with researchare essential to the improvement of undergraduate education [8, 9, 10, 11]. With this in mind,we now introduce the model that governs and sustains the teaching and
2006-1971: LEARNING BY ITERATION: EVOLVING CAPABILITIES INAEROSPACE CURRICULANarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 11.873.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Learning by Iteration: Evolving Capabilities in Aerospace CurriculaAbstractElectronic media allow engineering lectures to be covered in less than half the time it used totake. This paper explores the background and related issues, and argues for finishing the lecturematerial quickly, then using the time savings to revisit concepts, and integrate knowledgethrough several iterations. The experience from teaching five different courses at different levelsis mined to gauge the lessons
2006-637: PREPARING NEW FACULTY MEMBERS TO BE SUCCESSFUL: ANO-BRAINER AND YET A RADICAL CONCEPTRebecca Brent, Education Designs Inc. REBECCA BRENT, Ed.D. (rbrent@mindspring.com) is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm in Cary, North Carolina. Her interests include faculty development in the sciences and engineering, support programs for new faculty members, preparation of alternative licensure teachers, and applications of technology in the K-12 classroom. She was formerly an associate professor of education at East Carolina University. She is co-director of the ASEE National Effective Teaching Institute.Richard Felder, North Carolina State University RICHARD M
for an Online Self and Peer Assessment System,” in Per Learning in Higher Education, D. Boud, R. Cohen, and J. Sampson, eds, Kogan Page Limited, London, 2001, pp.156-169.2. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., and Cocking, R.R., eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.3. Mazur, E, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997.4. Mason, R.L., Gunst, R.F. and Hess, J.L. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, with Applications to Engineering and Science, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, New York, 1989.5. Mehta, S.I., “A Method for Instant Assessment and Active Learning,” J. of Engr. Educ., 84:295, 1995.6. Chen, J
organizing the strategic alliances for engineering education. Each educational alliance is a cluster of an expertise for one specific domain knowledge. Unlike a traditional department, the one that plays as the leader is the so-called the educational resource center (ERC) or the center school. The professor who is in charge of the ERC supposed to have the richest domain knowledge and more hardware setups in that expertise. Meanwhile, the leader shall be open-minded and is willing to share his educational resources at least within his or her cluster. The possible resources that may be shared include not only the hardware like teaching facilities, lab equipment, but the software such as the course materials as well. At the end
2006-680: THE ROADMAP OF ARITHMETIC: SUMMING IT UPAndrew Grossfield, Vaughn College of Aeronautics Throughout his career Dr. Grossfield, has combined an interest in engineering design and mathematics. He earned a BSEE at the City College of New York. During the early sixties, he obtained an M.S. degree in mathematics at night while working full time during the day, designing circuitry for aerospace/avionics companies. He is licensed in New York as a Professional Engineer and is a member of ASEE, IEEE, SIAM and MAA. Ai207@bfn.org is his e-mail address. Page 11.1323.1© American Society for Engineering
2006-328: DEVELOPMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUSES TO BE USEDIN TWO SEQUENTIAL THERMAL SCIENCE COURSESJohn Reisel, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee John R. Reisel is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wiscsonsin-Milwaukee (UWM). He serves as Director of the Combustion Diagnostics Lab, Associate Director of the Center for Alternative Fuels, and the Co-Director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. His research efforts concentrate on combustion and energy utilization. At UWM, Dr. Reisel has served on both the College of Engineering and Applied Science's and the university's undergraduate curriculum committees. Dr. Reisel was a 1998 recipient of the
2006-944: ASSESSING TEACHING METHODS FOR A COURSE IN NUMERICALMETHODSAutar Kaw, University of South Florida Autar K Kaw is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Jerome Krivanek Distinguished Teacher at the University of South Florida. With major funding from NSF, he is developing customized and holistic web-based modules for an undergraduate course in Numerical Methods (http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu). He has authored the textbook - Mechanics of Composite Materials, which is currently in its second edition. His scholarly interests include development of instructional technologies, integrating research in the classroom, thermal stresses, computational mechanics, and nanomechanics of
] Crown, S., “Improving Visualization Skills of Engineering Graphics Students Using Simple JavaScript WebBased Games.” Journal of Engineering Education. July 2001.[3] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (Eds.), “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., (1999).[4] Brophy, S., and Bransford, J., “Design Methods for Instructional Modules in Bioengineering”, Proceedings ofthe 2001 American Society for Engineering Education (2001). Page 11.313.16
several areas for improvement. First, we have opened the Olympiad toteams of all levels of background, from junior-high students to university students. Recognizingthat it is inappropriate to give the same test to all students, we will give exams at two differentlevels in 2006. Furthermore, we will prepare a study guide that will be posted on the TCFFHRCwebsite, and we will encourage teachers to focus on challenging their students by assignmentsand tests that require students to integrate knowledge as an everyday exercise.References1. D. Ahlgren and I. Verner “Integration of a Fire-Fighting Robot Contest in Multi-Level Engineering Education”, Proc. 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM.2. L. Vygotsky (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge
2006-1390: REDESIGN OF THE CORE CURRICULUM AT DUKE UNIVERSITYApril Brown, Duke University APRIL S. BROWN, Ph.D., is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University. Her research is focused on the synthesis and design of nanostructures to microelectronic devices. She received her Ph.D. in 1985 from Cornell University.Gary Ybarra, Duke University GARY A. YBARRA, Ph.D., is a Professor of the Practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University. His research interests include K-12 engineering outreach, engineering education, microwave imaging and electrical impedance tomography. He received his Ph.D. in
2006-996: UNDERSTANDING "DESIGN THINKING" IN THE CONTEXT OFEDUCATIONRichard Fry, Brigham Young University Richard Fry currently serves as the program chair in the Industrial Design Program in the School of Technology at Brigham Young University where he specializes in Product Design. Previous to entering the education field, he worked professionally in the areas of Appliance, Aerospace, Exhibit, and Home Fitness design. He received his MFA from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1994. Page 11.1363.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Understanding “Design
. Richard, and M.R. Cutkosky, "Feeling is believing: Using a Force-Feedback Joystick to Teach Dynamic Systems," ASEE Journal of Engineering Education., Vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 345-349, 2002.[2] J. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Expanded Edition, NAS Press, 2000[3] R. Bonert, “Interactive simulation of dynamic systems on a personal computer to support teaching,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1989.[4] E. Conley and K. Kokjer, “Classroom computers: don’t forget the analog,” CoED (journal) Computers in Page 11.680.14 Education Divisions of ASEE
2006-123: ASSESSING AN INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SCAFFOLD FORREINFORCING LEARNING OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICSKathy Schmidt, University of Texas-Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. In this position, she promotes the College of Engineering’s commitment to finding ways to enrich teaching and learning. She works in all aspects of education including design and development, faculty training, learner support, and evaluation.Mia Markey, University of Texas-Austin MIA K. MARKEY is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. The mission of her
2006-535: VIRTUAL AND DISTANCE EXPERIMENTS: PEDAGOGICALALTERNATIVES, NOT LOGISTICAL ALTERNATIVESEuan Lindsay, Curtin University of Technology Euan D. Lindsay is a Lecturer at Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia. He has recently completed a PhD in Engineering Education at the University of Melbourne, Australia, investigating the effects of remote and virtual access to laboratory hardware upon students’ learning outcomes. His research interests include engineering education, telecontrol (particularly internet-based telecontrol), animatronic puppetry, and technology-mediated interfaces for deaf-blind communication.Malcolm Good, University of Melbourne Malcolm C. Good received the
2006-1813: PROJECT TUNA II - BODE ANALYZER AND TEACHING TOOLDavid Beams, University of Texas-Tyler DAVID M. BEAMS is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler. He received his BS and MS degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in and the Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has had over 16 years of industrial experience in addition to his 8 years with UT-Tyler. He is a licensed professional engineer in Wisconsin and Texas and holds or shares four patents. Page 11.1045.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
2006-1652: INTRODUCTION OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN MECHANICSOF MATERIALSHonghui Yu, The City College of New YorkFeridun Delale, The City College of New York Page 11.839.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Introduction of Emerging Technologies in Mechanics of Materials Abstract Though technologies have advanced dramatically in the last century and Mechanicsof Materials(MoM) has found more applications in many new technologies, the MoMcurriculum has been fixed for decades. This paper presents our efforts in keeping MOMcurriculum current with the times by incorporating examples from emerging technologiesand everyday
future efforts will be to refine the feedback weoffer, to measure the effectiveness of such follow-on instruction, and to improve upon it.AcknowledgementsSupport by the National Science Foundation under grant REC-0440295 and by theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University is gratefullyacknowledged.BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION1. P. Black and D. William, “Assessment and Classroom Learning, “Assessment in Education, Vol. 5(1), pp. 7-73, 1998.2. National Research Council, Knowing What Students Know: the Science and Design of Educational Assessment, J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 2001.3. National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind
2006-2239: STUDENT MISCONCEPTIONS IN AN INTRODUCTORY DIGITALLOGIC DESIGN COURSECraig Zilles, University of Illinois-Urbana ChampaignJames Longino, University of Illinois-Urbana ChampaignMichael Loui, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 11.1163.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Student Misconceptions in an Introductory Logic Design CourseAbstractIn order to improve student learning, instructors should identify concepts that are difficult forstudents to understand. Instructors can then change course material or teaching methods to focuson these difficult concepts. Researchers can develop
2006-2485: A HANDS-ON, INTERACTIVE UNDERGRADUATE DIGITAL IMAGEPROCESSING COURSEAgnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Page 11.51.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Hands-On, Interactive Undergraduate Digital Image Processing CourseAbstractThis paper describes an experimental undergraduate digital image processing coursecreated and taught by the author. The course was designed to be an interactiveexperience. The lecture material, hands-on examples, and in-class computer exerciseswere blended together to form a unique interactive learning experience. Lecturescontained numerous MATLAB-based examples and students were required to
ClassroomThus nanoscience and the technology that it motivates may be among the most significantscience/technology revolutions to date. The National Science Foundation had this in mind whenit launched a comprehensive effort to enhance nanoscale science and engineering education. Theeffort began in stages over the range of years 2000 – 2005, beginning with graduate education,then undergraduate, high school, and K – 8.There are several reasons that argue for the study of the nanoscale in pre-college education.Nanotechnology is an enabling technology; it is not a technology category, but will makepossible advances in many areas. Thus many policy decisions will arise for which citizens shouldhave achieved a level of scientific literacy to make informed
2006-512: WORKING WITH SMALL COMPANIES IN CAMBODIA TO TEACHLEAN MANUFACTURING PRINCIPLES TO UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSMichael Miles, Brigham Young UniversityVal Hawks, Brigham Young University Page 11.1457.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Working with Small Companies in Cambodia to Teach Lean Manufacturing Principles to Undergraduate StudentsIntroductionTeaching lean manufacturing in the university environment is becoming more common, withmany schools in the United States offering “lean” undergraduate courses in various technologyand engineering programs. This trend is driven by companies who have implemented or aretrying to implement lean
” courses and in senior-level capstone design courses. Page 11.1149.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Strategies for Assessing Course-Specific OutcomesAbstractA proven method for satisfying the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) “Criterion 3” requirements is the formulation of outcomes specific to “core” courses in acurriculum, which are tied to the program outcomes. The challenges of assessing such course-specific outcomes are described in this paper, with a focus on practical realities and lessonslearned through seven trials in two different computer engineering courses spanning
2006-2205: WHAT’S SO IMPORTANT ABOUT PEER REVIEW OF TEACHINGPORTFOLIO COMPONENTS? AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OFPEER-REVIEW EPISODES WITHIN ETPPJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students
2006-2004: INFORMATION ASSURANCE FACULTY DEVELOPMENTWORKSHOPDouglas Jacobson, Iowa State University Dr. Doug Jacobson Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011Thomas Daniels, Iowa State University Dr. Thomas Daniels Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011 Page 11.757.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Information Assurance Faculty Development WorkshopAbstractThe Information Assurance Center at Iowa State University received support from the
2006-177: ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF MULTI-INTELLIGENCE METHODSUSED IN DYNAMICSLouis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis J. Everett is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and has educational research interests in the use of technology in the classroom. His technical research interests include robotics, machine design, dynamics and control systems. leverett@utep.edu http://research.utep.edu/pacelabElsa Villa, University of Texas-El Paso Elsa Villa is a lecturer in the Department of Teacher Education, Division of Mathematics, Science and Technology, at the University of Texas
2006-1004: A SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN INDUSTRY ANDACADEMIA: RED GOLD, INC.Jody Pierce, Purdue University Jody Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Organizational Leadership and Supervision at Purdue University's College of Technology location in Anderson, Indiana. Her business and industry background includes 28 years between General Motors and Delphi Automotive in manufacturing and labor relations. She has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business from Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College and a Master of Business Administration from Anderson University.Russell Aubrey, Purdue University Russell A. Aubrey is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue
2006-1934: TEACHING STUDENTS ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTOF MATERIAL CHOICE IN DESIGNHelen McLachlan, Granta Design Dr Helen McLachlan is Granta's product manager for education. She also has a PhD in materials science from the University of Cambridge.Patrick Coulter, Granta Design Dr Patrick Coulter is a director at Granta. He also has PH.D. in polymer science from the University of Cambridge.Mike Ashby, University of Cambridge Professor Mike Ashby FRS is Royal Society Research Professor in the Department of Engineering at the University of Cambridge and is a Visiting Professor of Design at the Royal College of Art, London, UK. His interests include materials selection in design, process
2006-2551: A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF PERSONAL RESPONSESYSTEMS IN INTRODUCTORY COMPUTER PROGRAMMINGK-Y Daisy Fan, Cornell UniversityClare van den Blink, Cornell University Page 11.24.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A comparison and evaluation of personal response systems in introductory computer programming1. IntroductionPersonal response systems (PRS) are being used in classrooms in order for the instructorto obtain real-time feedback on student comprehension of presented concepts. A typicalPRS comprises hand-held transmitters, or “clickers,” for students to submit answers,receivers that collect the answers, and software that creates
2006-1170: THE JOURNEY TO A TEACHING-ORIENTED FACULTY POSITION:A HANDBOOK OF ADVICE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSTammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland Tammy VanDeGrift is an assistant professor at the University of Portland. She earned a Bachelors degree in math and computer science at Gustavus Adolphus College. She completed a Masters and PhD in Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests include computer science education, educational technology, and media distribution systems.Janet Davis, University of Washington Janet Davis will join the faculty of Grinnell College as Assistant Professor of Computer Science in August 2006. She expects to