, decision making, communicatingwell, team working effectively, practicing ethical conduct, and developing a goodunderstanding of fundamental business concepts) to develop each of the topic into achapter in the book. Each chapter explains the topic in a prescriptive manner telling thestudents what they need to do as an engineer in dealing with that topic. Then it illustratesthese topics with examples from real-world case studies that are provided throughout thechapter. The students are also provided with a CD-ROM where they can view photos,videos, and explanations from the real-world case studies described in each chapter.Thus, each “soft skill” described in the chapter is also explained through a case study(real-world example). The topics covered
learning descriptions that best fit thefocus of the mentoring relationship. Mentees are asked to select a minimum of five learningdescriptions from a list of 48 that fall under the following categories: (1) career options; (2)professional development; (3) soft skills; (4) personal development. Next, the mentee is requiredto generate goal statements that clarify the purpose and objectives for the mentoring relationship.In order to establish boundaries and maintain confidentiality, the mentee identifies areas thathe/she is willing to share with the mentor, such as current experiences, relationships with peers,study habits and career aspirations. In addition, the mentee selects levels of confidentiality foreach area so the mentor knows in advance how
members involved in teaching required coursesmust now understand and be involved in the accreditation process on a continuing basis, notjust in the months preceding each visit.The connection between active/ cooperative learning and EC2000 is strong. Active/cooperative learning seems to be an efficient way to address the requirements of ABETEC2000. The careful design of an active/ cooperative learning course ensures that studentswill acquire technical as well as non-technical or soft skills specified in the famous eleven 3a-3k outcomes. Felder et al2 discuss the instructional paradigms of cooperative learning andproblem-based learning and estimates that each of them has the potential to address all eleven
entrepreneurship division of ASEE, NCIIA, and Stanford’s REEprogram are developing a critical mass of resources supporting engineering entrepreneurship. The evidence in support of entrepreneurship education is growing. Economic impact, jobcreation, society enhancing innovation, understanding the financial value associated withinnovation and commercialization, the soft-skills of business, and the opportunity to actionorientation of entrepreneurship are undeniably beneficial to engineers graduating from Americancolleges and universities. Is education reform so slow really? Or are the issues around adoptingentrepreneurship as part of engineering curriculum similar to design teaching issues uncoveredby Bjorkland & Colbeck above. Do engineering