Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering Education I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Soller, Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis; Erdogan Sener, Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Construction

an ng S c o rk es n on st ru n n h ds r su nt se Sta ns

Conference Session

Innovation in Construction Engineering Education II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gunnar Lucko, Catholic University of America; Panagiotis Tsopelas, Catholic University of America; Timothy Garland, Catholic University of America; Rodrigo Gonzalez, Catholic University of America; Thomas Lee, Catholic University of America; Justin Molineaux, Catholic University of America

Tagged Divisions

Construction

to $5B 5/27/03 3/25 and Afghanistan 6.1, 5.6 1,000 100’s 1,000’s 2,000 3/27/2002 1/26/01 India 7.7 20,085 166,836 - 1,122,000 1/13/01 El Salvador 7.7 852 4,723 - over 258,226 11/12/99 Turkey 7.1 894 4,948 - extensive 9/20/99 Taiwan 7.5 2,400 8,700 600,000 82,000, $14B 8/17/99 Turkey 7.4 17,118 50,000 500,000 $6.5B 1/25/99 Colombia 6.2 1,885 4,750 250,000 60% New 7/17/98

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Cottrell, University of North Carolina-Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Construction

AC 2007-2906: INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING CONSTRUCTIONFUNDAMENTALS: IMPLEMENTING DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT DELIVERYPROCEDURES INTO A COURSE IN COST ESTIMATINGDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina-Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics, dynamics

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Engy Serag, San Diego State University; Amr Oloufa, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Construction

changed work, 4)The way changeorder is compensated, and 5) Extension.As for the interaction variables, the most significant interaction of variables that contribute to theincrease in the contract price due to the change order: 1) Time and (reason of the change (A),approved change order, restricted access, the way the change order is expended, and how thechange order is compensated), 2) Reason (B) and (change order is expended as credit, changeorder is compensated as time and material basis, extension is granted). 3) Reason (D) and (party,way the change order is expended, when the change order is compensated as lump sum).The number of data points used to create this model is 137 data points. The standard deviation(S) achieved is 0.0253270% , R-Sq

Conference Session

Innovation in Construction Engineering Education I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tulio Sulbaran, University of Southern Mississippi; David Marchman, University of Southern Mississippi

Tagged Divisions

Construction

:30pm (M-F) ANYTIME (S-S) Figure 15. Sample of a Construction Drawing Table 5 Brief Description Of The Construction Sequence Of ActivitiesTimeframe Description02-16-01 - 2-22-01 Placed median barriers southbound02-23-01 - 03-13-01 Placed median barriers northbound03-20-01 Closed Natchez Trace Parkway (NTP) Bridge & West ramps of NTP10-03-01 - 10-12-01 Placed median barriers southbound to put traffic on newly constructed inside lane (becomes shoulder when complete)11-01-01 - 11-09-01 Placed median barriers northbound to put traffic to the newly constructed inside lane

Conference Session

Innovation in Construction Engineering Education II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Pocock, U.S. Air Force Academy; Steve Kuennen, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Construction

. Page 12.401.82. Russell, J. S. and Stouffer, W. B., “Survey of the National Civil Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, April 2005, pp. 118-128.3. Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice, “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century; Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future”, American Society of Civil Engineers, January 12, 2004.4. Meade, R.B., Pocock, J.B., and Riester, N., “Civil and Environmental Engineering Education at the Air Force Academy”, The Military Engineer, Vol. 94, No. 616, May-June, 2002.5. Pocock, J.B. and Ridilla, P.A., “Project-Based Construction Education

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amitabha Bandyopadhyay, State University of New York; Loucas Chrysafi, State University of New York; Alfred Scalza, State University of New York; Jeff Hartman, State University of New York; Carmine Napolitano, State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Construction

40142 1992 41310 1993 40532 1994 ------- 1995 40880 1996 40744 1997 40842 1998 41243 1999 42731 2000 43294 2001 43552 2002 44688 2003 44334 2004 43966 2005 41781 2006 41691 Page 12.1305.6 Average Annual Daily Traffic AADT = - 346883 + 194.6 year 45000 S 1095.11 R-Sq 49.8% R-Sq(adj) 46.5% 44000 43000AADT 42000 41000 40000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Conference Session

Innovation in Construction Engineering Education I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Virendra Varma, Missouri Western State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

/Tunnel design.” CE News, September 2006, pp. 16-17. 3. Ibid. 4. Ross, Steven S. “Construction Disasters: Design Failures, Causes, and Prevention.” McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984. 5. Ibid 6. Ibid 7. Feld, J., and Carper K. “Construction Failure.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997. Page 12.925.9

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering Education I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Mulva, Texas State University-San Marcos; Robert Tisdel, Texas State University - San Marcos

Tagged Divisions

Construction

technology, engineering students readily realize the link betweenplanning and the attainment of project goals and objectives. Certainly this type of understandingpoints towards an increasing role for BIM in construction engineering in the future.References 1. American Institute of Architects (AIA) (2006). AIA Document A201: General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. AIA, Washington, DC. 2. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. HarperCollins, New York, NY. 3. Workman, R. (2001). Personal Interview. Chairman, BSW International, Tulsa, OK. 4. Kieran, S. and Timberlake, J. (2004). Refabricating Architecture. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 5. O’Keefe, C. (2002). Strength in Systems. Builder, 5, 176-180. 6

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engineering II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gunnar Lucko, Catholic University of America; Michael Madden, United Space Alliance; Justin Molineaux, Catholic University of America

Tagged Divisions

Construction

, W. C. (2004). Construction project planning and scheduling. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.10. Mubarak, S. (2005). Construction project scheduling and control. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.11. Feigenbaum, L. H. (2002). Construction scheduling with Primavera Project Planner®. 2nd ed., Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.12. Hegazy, T. (2002). Computer-based construction project management. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.13. Buttelwerth, J. W. (2005). Computer integrated construction project scheduling. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.14. Lucko, G. (2005). “Reviving a mechanistic