Asee peer logo
Displaying all 7 results
Conference Session
New Trends in ECE Education I
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susan Lord, University of San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
” ofgathering data, conducting experiments etc. and the “rhetorical space” of writing to communicateto an audience of their peers, they create their own knowledge.Students are more likely to see the value of writing when it is tied to the technical content. As Page 12.582.3Pesante says “Learning is most effective when it takes place in context and when it is reinforcedthrough the students’ course of study.”13 In all of the examples in this paper, an engineeringprofessor rather than a writing professor grades the writing. Thus the quality of the writing andthe technical accuracy of the work are inseparable. This adds legitimacy to the claim that writingis
Conference Session
Design in the ECE Curriculum
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christine Co, Oklahoma State University; Bear Turner, Oklahoma State University; Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
” both mimic engineering practice andfollow the cognitive apprentice model. Scaffolding is provided by the instructor through thestandardized report format and rubric with direct feedback on performance to students. Page 12.93.5As well as a team report, each student submits a one page statement outlining their experienceson the project and completes a peer evaluation of their teammates. Students rate each teammember’s contribution to the team through a series of qualitative and quantitative questions.While completing the peer evaluation the student is asked to consider the work done by
Conference Session
Design in the ECE Curriculum
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas Williams, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert Butera, Georgia Institute of Technology; Selcuk Uluagac, Georgia Institute of Technology; Matthew Clark, Georgia Institute of Technology; Andy Deck, National Instruments; Michael Torba, National Instruments; Steven Trahan, National Instruments
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
understanding of DC motor control and how to work with them (power, speed, torque, and tradeoffs using gearing) • Describe the many subdisciplines of ECE • Design autonomous robots that respond to sensor inputs and use motors/actuators to accomplish simple tasks • Assess the factors affecting the reliability and repeatability of the programmed tasks (How consistently does it work? How well does it work? Why?) • Work in teams, including: o Fair delegation of tasks o Communicate with peers (i.e., other team members) o Assess the performance of team members o Create a realistic time-line for a design project and stick to it or assess why it didn’t work o
Conference Session
Innovations in ECE Education III
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cordelia Brown, Purdue University; David Meyer, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
utilization of the on-line Index of Learning Styles(ILS) tool, in an effort to help guide students into the division that best matched their individuallearning style. There are three primary learning outcomes in the junior-level course, each of which isassessed using a comprehensive, in-lab practical exam: (1) an ability to write programs for acomputer in assembly language, (2) an ability to interface a microprocessor to various devices,and (3) an ability to effectively utilize the wide variety of peripherals integrated into acontemporary microcontroller. Each exam consists of three components: (a) standardizedmultiple-choice questions that gauge understanding of content; (b) analysis/design questions thatgauge basic skills; and (c) application
Conference Session
Innovations in ECE Education III
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Don Millard, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Mohamed Chouikha, Howard University; Frederick Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
, each student also needs individual practice setting up equipment, taking data, and troubleshooting in order to reach his/her full potential as a technical professional. • Overcome Equipment Limitations: Much of the hands-on equipment that is used in studio makes extensive use of wiring to connect the components of the experiments. The equipment and components are unwieldy, and take up an inordinate amount of space on a table top. Students using these set-ups have as little as a few inches of remaining space for books, notebooks and writing space. In addition, the wire connections and limited space significantly interfere with the data taking process in many experiments, yielding results that are not fully
Conference Session
Innovations in ECE Education I
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Haley Haywood, Oklahoma State University; Forrest Austin, Oklahoma State University; Seth Williams, Oklahoma State University; Cameron Musgrove, Oklahoma State University; Charles Bunting, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
help help help help1. Class activities for each week Page 12.1043.132. How parts of the classwork, labs, reading, orassignments related to each other 123. The grading system for the class A little Moderate Much Very muchH. Individual support as a learner NA No help help help help help1. The quality of contact with the teacher2. The quality of contact with the TAs3. Working with peers outside of
Conference Session
Digital and Embedded System Design
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Clint Kohl, Cedarville University; Keith Shomper, Cedarville University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
, anddevelopment schedule. Such pre-coordination is necessary to help ensure we offer studentsprojects which are suitably challenging in both size and content.With regard to project size and scope, we endeavor to provide projects employing all phases ofthe software development cycle, having approximately 800 to 1200 man-hours of work effort,and also requiring at least a modest attempt at independent research beyond our programs’course curriculums. Once all candidate projects are approved by the faculty, we develop a briefpresentation for each one to give to our senior students on the first class day. Students then rankorder the projects in which they have the most interest. At the same time, they also identify whoamong their peers they would like as team